17 Squares In A Larger Square - Images
I hope somebody gets this one by Jargon_Scott
17 Squares In A Larger Square
Square Packing
!["I also managed to improve the solution for n=1 to s<0.97, and with some upgrades I think I can hit <0.96"](https://i.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/masonry/002/536/983/1eb.png)
!["I also managed to improve the solution for n=1 to s<0.97, and with some upgrades I think I can hit <0.96"](https://i.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/original/002/536/983/1eb.png)
17 Squares In A Larger Square
19 Circles In A Larger Circle
![es's half-assed math class @iceomorphism to those of you upset by the messy optimal solution for packing 17 squares in a square, i would like to inform you that packing 19 circles in a circle produces this instead the sides of every square/triangle here are equal in size, so they're all perfectly symmetric! ALT : 9:24 AM. Feb 18, 2023 49.9K Views](https://i.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/masonry/002/535/862/8e4.png)
![es's half-assed math class @iceomorphism to those of you upset by the messy optimal solution for packing 17 squares in a square, i would like to inform you that packing 19 circles in a circle produces this instead the sides of every square/triangle here are equal in size, so they're all perfectly symmetric! ALT : 9:24 AM. Feb 18, 2023 49.9K Views](https://i.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/original/002/535/862/8e4.png)
17 Squares In A Larger Square
The Reason Why God Is Dead
![Nathan is in SF (say hi ) @NathanpmYoung god is dead and the most efficient way to pack 17 squares into a square killed him Traduzir Tweet 17. s = 4.675+ Found by John Bidwell in 1997. 8:16 PM - 14 de fev de 2023 1,3 mi Visualizações](https://i.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/masonry/002/538/023/c5c.jpg)
![Nathan is in SF (say hi ) @NathanpmYoung god is dead and the most efficient way to pack 17 squares into a square killed him Traduzir Tweet 17. s = 4.675+ Found by John Bidwell in 1997. 8:16 PM - 14 de fev de 2023 1,3 mi Visualizações](https://i.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/original/002/538/023/c5c.jpg)
17 Squares In A Larger Square
16 Squares In A Larger Square
![rezuaq, @Rezuaq : The optimal known packing of 16 equal squares into a larger square - i.e. the arrangement which minimises the size of the large square. 2:25 AM. Feb 19, 2023 321.1K Views](https://i.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/masonry/002/535/859/c38.png)
![rezuaq, @Rezuaq : The optimal known packing of 16 equal squares into a larger square - i.e. the arrangement which minimises the size of the large square. 2:25 AM. Feb 19, 2023 321.1K Views](https://i.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/original/002/535/859/c38.png)
17 Squares In A Larger Square
Settlers of Catan with extra tiles
![arborelia is leaving @arborelia good news: Settlers of Catan with 2 extra tiles bad news: Settlers of Catan with 3 extra tiles 20-21. ALT s=5 Trivial. 4:25 AM. Dec 12, 2021 22. s = (39+8√3)/10 = 5.285+ Found by Maurizio Morandi in April 2015. ALT 230 Retweets 18 Quote Tweets 1,156 Likes :](https://i.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/masonry/002/535/856/fbb.png)
![arborelia is leaving @arborelia good news: Settlers of Catan with 2 extra tiles bad news: Settlers of Catan with 3 extra tiles 20-21. ALT s=5 Trivial. 4:25 AM. Dec 12, 2021 22. s = (39+8√3)/10 = 5.285+ Found by Maurizio Morandi in April 2015. ALT 230 Retweets 18 Quote Tweets 1,156 Likes :](https://i.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/original/002/535/856/fbb.png)
17 Squares In A Larger Square
Square Packing New Record
17 Squares In A Larger Square
17 Squares In A Larger Square
![Daniel Piker @KangarooPhysics The optimal known packing of 17 equal squares into a larger square - i.e. the arrangement which minimises the size of the large square. 2:47 PM. Feb 14, 2023 4.4M Views : 2,618 Retweets 1,118 Quote Tweets 35.4K Likes](https://i.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/masonry/002/535/834/3b8.png)
![Daniel Piker @KangarooPhysics The optimal known packing of 17 equal squares into a larger square - i.e. the arrangement which minimises the size of the large square. 2:47 PM. Feb 14, 2023 4.4M Views : 2,618 Retweets 1,118 Quote Tweets 35.4K Likes](https://i.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/original/002/535/834/3b8.png)
17 Squares In A Larger Square
17 Squares In A Larger Square
![Daniel Piker @KangarooPhysics Seeing that this is the best way we know to fit this many equal squares inside a square makes me feel a bit better about struggling to fit the plates in the dishwasher! 17. S s = 4.675+ Found by John Bidwell in 1997. 5:14 AM Dec 10, 2021 :](https://i.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/masonry/002/535/850/f2d.png)
![Daniel Piker @KangarooPhysics Seeing that this is the best way we know to fit this many equal squares inside a square makes me feel a bit better about struggling to fit the plates in the dishwasher! 17. S s = 4.675+ Found by John Bidwell in 1997. 5:14 AM Dec 10, 2021 :](https://i.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/original/002/535/850/f2d.png)
17 Squares In A Larger Square
Circles packed optimally in squares and circles
![Daniel Piker @Kangaroo Physics Dec 10, 2021 The best known packings of N equal circles into a square and a circle. 20 4 25 7 61 t 281 9 36 ● 91 16 19 37 1,564 49 127 la ↑](https://i.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/masonry/002/535/851/424.png)
![Daniel Piker @Kangaroo Physics Dec 10, 2021 The best known packings of N equal circles into a square and a circle. 20 4 25 7 61 t 281 9 36 ● 91 16 19 37 1,564 49 127 la ↑](https://i.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/original/002/535/851/424.png)
17 Squares In A Larger Square
17 Squares In A Larger Square
![eigenrobot @eigenrobot Dec 11, 2021 vaguely offensive act by God if this holds up Daniel Piker @Kangaroo Physics · Dec 10, 2021 Seeing that this is the best way we know to fit this many equal squares inside a square makes me feel a bit better about struggling to fit the plates in the dishwasher! Show this thread 17. O 48 S = 4.675+ Found by John Bidwell in 1997. 1 45 736 da ↑ :](https://i.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/masonry/002/535/853/44c.png)
![eigenrobot @eigenrobot Dec 11, 2021 vaguely offensive act by God if this holds up Daniel Piker @Kangaroo Physics · Dec 10, 2021 Seeing that this is the best way we know to fit this many equal squares inside a square makes me feel a bit better about struggling to fit the plates in the dishwasher! Show this thread 17. O 48 S = 4.675+ Found by John Bidwell in 1997. 1 45 736 da ↑ :](https://i.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/original/002/535/853/44c.png)
17 Squares In A Larger Square
17 squares in a larger square killed God
![Nathan @NathanpmYoung god is dead and the most efficient way to pack 17 squares into a square killed him 17. s = 4.675+ Found by John Bidwell in 1997. : 4:46 AM Feb 15, 2023 1.3M Views](https://i.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/masonry/002/535/857/3b9.png)
![Nathan @NathanpmYoung god is dead and the most efficient way to pack 17 squares into a square killed him 17. s = 4.675+ Found by John Bidwell in 1997. : 4:46 AM Feb 15, 2023 1.3M Views](https://i.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/original/002/535/857/3b9.png)
17 Squares In A Larger Square
17 squares in a larger square aren't real, they can't hurt you
![Rob Miles @robertskmiles My therapist: You need to stop fixating on the optimal way to fit 17 squares into a bigger square. It's not real and it can't hurt you. The optimal way to fit 17 squares into a bigger square: 7:29 AM · Dec 11, 2021 326 Retweets 18 Quote Tweets 1,288 Likes](https://i.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/masonry/002/535/860/554.png)
![Rob Miles @robertskmiles My therapist: You need to stop fixating on the optimal way to fit 17 squares into a bigger square. It's not real and it can't hurt you. The optimal way to fit 17 squares into a bigger square: 7:29 AM · Dec 11, 2021 326 Retweets 18 Quote Tweets 1,288 Likes](https://i.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/original/002/535/860/554.png)
17 Squares In A Larger Square
17 Squares In A Larger Square
![Daniel Piker @KangarooPhysics : Also - it's not that there aren't any symmetric arrangements possible for 17. It's just that they're not as compact as the one on the right. 3:30 AM. Feb 18, 2023 46.6K Views](https://i.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/masonry/002/535/854/52a.png)
![Daniel Piker @KangarooPhysics : Also - it's not that there aren't any symmetric arrangements possible for 17. It's just that they're not as compact as the one on the right. 3:30 AM. Feb 18, 2023 46.6K Views](https://i.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/original/002/535/854/52a.png)
17 Squares In A Larger Square
28 squares in a larger square Vs 17 Squares
![arborelia is leaving @arborelia you can feel the results of this problem in your soul. You look at the optimal packing of 28 squares in a square and say, oh that's nice, what an ingenious and satisfying solution and then you see 17 squares and you're like, how could a caring god do this to their universe 17. s = 3+2√2 = 5.828+ ALT Found by Frits Göbel 3:59 AM · Dec 12, 2021 s = 4.675+ Found by John Bidwell in 1997. ALT 887 Retweets 75 Quote Tweets 2,869 Likes : ...](https://i.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/masonry/002/535/855/483.png)
![arborelia is leaving @arborelia you can feel the results of this problem in your soul. You look at the optimal packing of 28 squares in a square and say, oh that's nice, what an ingenious and satisfying solution and then you see 17 squares and you're like, how could a caring god do this to their universe 17. s = 3+2√2 = 5.828+ ALT Found by Frits Göbel 3:59 AM · Dec 12, 2021 s = 4.675+ Found by John Bidwell in 1997. ALT 887 Retweets 75 Quote Tweets 2,869 Likes : ...](https://i.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/original/002/535/855/483.png)
17 Squares In A Larger Square
17 Squares In A Larger Square but it's better
![Lynn @chordbug this is the optimal way to pack 17 squares in a larger square. I promise ALT 8=4+2 6:58 AM. Feb 18, 2023 355.8K Views :](https://i.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/masonry/002/535/858/0c2.png)
![Lynn @chordbug this is the optimal way to pack 17 squares in a larger square. I promise ALT 8=4+2 6:58 AM. Feb 18, 2023 355.8K Views :](https://i.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/original/002/535/858/0c2.png)
17 Squares In A Larger Square