Elon Musk vs. Sam Altman / OpenAI Lawsuit - Images

Sorted By:

Change Your Name

X OpenAl @OpenAI - 19h We are dedicated to the OpenAl mission and have pursued it every step of the way. We're sharing some facts about our relationship with Elon, and we intend to move to dismiss all of his claims. OpenAl and Elon Musk From openai.com 1.3K Elon Musk @elonmusk 936 X OpenAl 2.9K Change your name 1:27 AM Mar 6, 2024 · 1.2M Views 1.1K 11K 11K ₁2.7M 口企 Subscribe 328 ←] 企
X OpenAl @OpenAI - 19h We are dedicated to the OpenAl mission and have pursued it every step of the way. We're sharing some facts about our relationship with Elon, and we intend to move to dismiss all of his claims. OpenAl and Elon Musk From openai.com 1.3K Elon Musk @elonmusk 936 X OpenAl 2.9K Change your name 1:27 AM Mar 6, 2024 · 1.2M Views 1.1K 11K 11K ₁2.7M 口企 Subscribe 328 ←] 企

Elon Musk vs. Sam Altman / OpenAI Lawsuit
elon musk openai sam altman

Corporate Structure

OPENAI, L.P., Is Not Is Is Not OPENAI, INC., Is OPENAI GP, L.L.C., Is OPENAI HOLDINGS, LLC Is Not
OPENAI, L.P., Is Not Is Is Not OPENAI, INC., Is OPENAI GP, L.L.C., Is OPENAI HOLDINGS, LLC Is Not

Elon Musk vs. Sam Altman / OpenAI Lawsuit
elon musk openai sam altman spidermen pointing

OpenAI Spiderman

Y PO OPENAI, INC. OPENAI, L.P OPENAI GLOBAL, LLC OPENAI, OAI L.L.C. CORPORATION LLC OPENAI HOLDINGS, LLC, OPENAI GP, L.L.C. OPENAI OPCO, LLC
Y PO OPENAI, INC. OPENAI, L.P OPENAI GLOBAL, LLC OPENAI, OAI L.L.C. CORPORATION LLC OPENAI HOLDINGS, LLC, OPENAI GP, L.L.C. OPENAI OPCO, LLC

Elon Musk vs. Sam Altman / OpenAI Lawsuit
elon musk openai sam altman spidermen pointing

OpenAI Corporate Structure Can't Hurt You

sophie @netcapgirl "it's ok, the openai corporate structure can't hurt you" the openai corporate structure: ELON MUSK, an individual, VS. Plaintiff, : SAMUEL ALTMAN, an individual, GREGORY BROCKMAN, an individual, OPENAI, INC., a corporation, OPENAI, L.P., a limited partnership, OPENAI, L.L.C., a limited liability company, OPENAI GP, L.L.C., a limited liability company, OPENAI OPCO, LLC, a limited liability company, OPENAI GLOBAL, LLC, a limited liability company, OAI CORPORATION, LLC, a limited liability company, OPENAI HOLDINGS, LLC, a limited
sophie @netcapgirl "it's ok, the openai corporate structure can't hurt you" the openai corporate structure: ELON MUSK, an individual, VS. Plaintiff, : SAMUEL ALTMAN, an individual, GREGORY BROCKMAN, an individual, OPENAI, INC., a corporation, OPENAI, L.P., a limited partnership, OPENAI, L.L.C., a limited liability company, OPENAI GP, L.L.C., a limited liability company, OPENAI OPCO, LLC, a limited liability company, OPENAI GLOBAL, LLC, a limited liability company, OAI CORPORATION, LLC, a limited liability company, OPENAI HOLDINGS, LLC, a limited

Elon Musk vs. Sam Altman / OpenAI Lawsuit
elon musk openai sam altman

Hard Takeoff?

AS2 @somewheresy. 19h H--------, THIS is the actual reveal. We're in the hard takeoff scenario. That's why we're not getting the weights. From: Ilya Sutskever< To: Elon Musk < Sam Altman < >, Greg Brockman < Date: Sat, Jan 2, 2016 at 9:06 AM Subject: Fwd: congrats on the falcon 9 The article is concerned with a hard takeoff scenario: if a hard takeoff occurs, and a safe Al is harder to build than an unsafe one, then by opensorucing everything, we make it easy for someone unscrupulous with access to overwhelming amount of hardware to build an unsafe Al, which will experience a hard takeoff. As we get closer to building Al, it will make sense to start being less open. The Open in openAI means that everyone should benefit from the fruits of Al after its built, but it's totally OK to not share the science (even though sharing everything is definitely the right strategy in the short and possibly medium term for recruitment purposes). :
AS2 @somewheresy. 19h H--------, THIS is the actual reveal. We're in the hard takeoff scenario. That's why we're not getting the weights. From: Ilya Sutskever< To: Elon Musk < Sam Altman < >, Greg Brockman < Date: Sat, Jan 2, 2016 at 9:06 AM Subject: Fwd: congrats on the falcon 9 The article is concerned with a hard takeoff scenario: if a hard takeoff occurs, and a safe Al is harder to build than an unsafe one, then by opensorucing everything, we make it easy for someone unscrupulous with access to overwhelming amount of hardware to build an unsafe Al, which will experience a hard takeoff. As we get closer to building Al, it will make sense to start being less open. The Open in openAI means that everyone should benefit from the fruits of Al after its built, but it's totally OK to not share the science (even though sharing everything is definitely the right strategy in the short and possibly medium term for recruitment purposes). :

Elon Musk vs. Sam Altman / OpenAI Lawsuit
elon musk openai sam altman

Claude On Emails

Pietro Schirano @skirano 17h I used Claude 3 to unredact this part from the OpenAl emails. What's wild is that they used a "per word" redaction, meaning each redaction length is proportional to the length of the words, so assuming context and word length, this is Claude's guess using the page source: Musk < tskever< Itman < Dec 26, 2018 at 12:07 PM eel I should reiterate ility assessment of OpenAl being relevant to DeepMind/Google dramatic change in execution and resources is 0%. Not 1%. I wish it were >, Greg Brockman < g several hundred million won't be enough. This needs billions per year ly or forget it. tely, humanity's future is in the hands of re doing a lot more than this. e I'm wrong. 102 285 Sam Altman <redacted>, Demis Hassabis <redacted> e: Wed, Dec 26, 2018 at 12:07 PM ject: I feel I should reiterate probability assessment of OpenAI being relevant to DeepMind/Google without a matic change in execution and resources is 0%. Not 1%. I wish it were otherwise. en raising several hundred million won't be enough. This needs billions per year mediately or forget it. fortunately, humanity's future is in the hands of Google. lieve DeepMind alone is spending north of $100M per year. d they are doing a lot more than this. ey are building huge clusters and have a clear path to universal AI that can adapt to any blem and crush humans at every intellectual task while running on cheap hardware. ally hope I'm wrong. n : te: "Demis Hassabis" is likely the redacted name in the "CC" field based on the length I the fact that he is the co-founder and CEO of DeepMind, which is mentioned several es in the email. e other guesses are based on the context and word lengths, but there's no way to be tain without seeing the original unredacted text. This illustrates the problem with the action method used - even with the text blacked out, the word lengths provide stantial clues about the redacted content. 1.8K ₁513K Copy Retry ( ←]
Pietro Schirano @skirano 17h I used Claude 3 to unredact this part from the OpenAl emails. What's wild is that they used a "per word" redaction, meaning each redaction length is proportional to the length of the words, so assuming context and word length, this is Claude's guess using the page source: Musk < tskever< Itman < Dec 26, 2018 at 12:07 PM eel I should reiterate ility assessment of OpenAl being relevant to DeepMind/Google dramatic change in execution and resources is 0%. Not 1%. I wish it were >, Greg Brockman < g several hundred million won't be enough. This needs billions per year ly or forget it. tely, humanity's future is in the hands of re doing a lot more than this. e I'm wrong. 102 285 Sam Altman <redacted>, Demis Hassabis <redacted> e: Wed, Dec 26, 2018 at 12:07 PM ject: I feel I should reiterate probability assessment of OpenAI being relevant to DeepMind/Google without a matic change in execution and resources is 0%. Not 1%. I wish it were otherwise. en raising several hundred million won't be enough. This needs billions per year mediately or forget it. fortunately, humanity's future is in the hands of Google. lieve DeepMind alone is spending north of $100M per year. d they are doing a lot more than this. ey are building huge clusters and have a clear path to universal AI that can adapt to any blem and crush humans at every intellectual task while running on cheap hardware. ally hope I'm wrong. n : te: "Demis Hassabis" is likely the redacted name in the "CC" field based on the length I the fact that he is the co-founder and CEO of DeepMind, which is mentioned several es in the email. e other guesses are based on the context and word lengths, but there's no way to be tain without seeing the original unredacted text. This illustrates the problem with the action method used - even with the text blacked out, the word lengths provide stantial clues about the redacted content. 1.8K ₁513K Copy Retry ( ←]

Elon Musk vs. Sam Altman / OpenAI Lawsuit
elon musk openai sam altman

Doge Designer Post

DogeDesigner @cb_doge. 5h Sam Altman reading Elon's posts on X: 0:01 ...
DogeDesigner @cb_doge. 5h Sam Altman reading Elon's posts on X: 0:01 ...

Elon Musk vs. Sam Altman / OpenAI Lawsuit
elon musk openai sam altman

Altman Meme


Elon Musk vs. Sam Altman / OpenAI Lawsuit
elon musk openai sam altman

ClosedAI Meme

Elon Musk X @elonmusk. 7h That's an old photo Closed Al 0 OpenAl :
Elon Musk X @elonmusk. 7h That's an old photo Closed Al 0 OpenAl :

Elon Musk vs. Sam Altman / OpenAI Lawsuit
elon musk openai sam altman

Humanity's Future

From: Elon Musk To: Ilya Sutskever CC: Sam Altman Date: Wed, Dec 26, 2018 at 12:07 PM Subject: I feel I should reiterate V >, Greg Brockman < My probability assessment of OpenAl being relevant to DeepMind/Google without a dramatic change in execution and resources is 0%. Not 1%. I wish it were otherwise. I really hope I'm wrong. Even raising several hundred million won't be enough. This needs billions per year immediately or forget it. Unfortunately, humanity's future is in the hands of And they are doing a lot more than this. Elon <
From: Elon Musk To: Ilya Sutskever CC: Sam Altman Date: Wed, Dec 26, 2018 at 12:07 PM Subject: I feel I should reiterate V >, Greg Brockman < My probability assessment of OpenAl being relevant to DeepMind/Google without a dramatic change in execution and resources is 0%. Not 1%. I wish it were otherwise. I really hope I'm wrong. Even raising several hundred million won't be enough. This needs billions per year immediately or forget it. Unfortunately, humanity's future is in the hands of And they are doing a lot more than this. Elon <

Elon Musk vs. Sam Altman / OpenAI Lawsuit
elon musk openai sam altman

Musk/Altman Exchange

From: Ilya Sutskever < To: Elon Musk Brockman >, Sam Altman Date: Sat, Jan 2, 2016 at 9:06 AM Subject: Fwd: congrats on the falcon 9 The article is concerned with a hard takeoff scenario: if a hard takeoff occurs, and a safe Al is harder to build than an unsafe one, then by opensorucing everything, we make it easy for someone unscrupulous with access to overwhelming amount of hardware to build an unsafe Al, which will experience a hard takeoff. >, Greg As we get closer to building Al, it will make sense to start being less open. The Open in openAl means that everyone should benefit from the fruits of Al after its built, but it's totally OK to not share the science (even though sharing everything is definitely the right strategy in the short and possibly medium term for recruitment purposes). From: Elon Musk < To: Ilya Sutskever< Date: Sat, Jan 2, 2016 at 9:11 AM Subject: Fwd: congrats on the falcon 9 Yup
From: Ilya Sutskever < To: Elon Musk Brockman >, Sam Altman Date: Sat, Jan 2, 2016 at 9:06 AM Subject: Fwd: congrats on the falcon 9 The article is concerned with a hard takeoff scenario: if a hard takeoff occurs, and a safe Al is harder to build than an unsafe one, then by opensorucing everything, we make it easy for someone unscrupulous with access to overwhelming amount of hardware to build an unsafe Al, which will experience a hard takeoff. >, Greg As we get closer to building Al, it will make sense to start being less open. The Open in openAl means that everyone should benefit from the fruits of Al after its built, but it's totally OK to not share the science (even though sharing everything is definitely the right strategy in the short and possibly medium term for recruitment purposes). From: Elon Musk < To: Ilya Sutskever< Date: Sat, Jan 2, 2016 at 9:11 AM Subject: Fwd: congrats on the falcon 9 Yup

Elon Musk vs. Sam Altman / OpenAI Lawsuit
elon musk openai sam altman

Bar Exam

Posted by u/assymetry1 7 hours ago 317 News ChatGPT passed the Bar exam for situations just like this 06:42 ← Post Mario Nawfal @MarioNawfal ELON IN SUIT: BREAKING: ELON MUSK SUES OPENAI OVER AI THREAT 232 Comments 19 Share "OpenAI, Inc. has been transformed into a closed-source de facto subsidiary of the largest technolog SEE FULL IMAGEny in the world: Save CT NON 1/3 Subscribe ... ⠀
Posted by u/assymetry1 7 hours ago 317 News ChatGPT passed the Bar exam for situations just like this 06:42 ← Post Mario Nawfal @MarioNawfal ELON IN SUIT: BREAKING: ELON MUSK SUES OPENAI OVER AI THREAT 232 Comments 19 Share "OpenAI, Inc. has been transformed into a closed-source de facto subsidiary of the largest technolog SEE FULL IMAGEny in the world: Save CT NON 1/3 Subscribe ... ⠀

Elon Musk vs. Sam Altman / OpenAI Lawsuit
openai sam altman

The Emails

Internal Tech Emails @TechEmails Sam Altman emails Elon Musk June 24, 2015 1) The mission would be to create the first general Al and use it for individual empowerment-ie, the distributed version of the future that seems the safest. More generally, safety should be a first-class requirement. 2) I think we'd ideally start with a group of 7-10 people, and plan to expand from there. really helpful for getting work pointed in the right direction getting the best people to be part of it. Ideally you'd come by and talk to them about progress once a month or whatever. We generically call people involved in some limited way in YC "part-time partners" (we do that with Peter Thiel for example, though at this point he's very involved) but we could call it whatever you want. Even if you can't really spend time on it 1:33 PM Mar 1, 2024 · 57.2K Views 14 187 the foundation and used "for the good of the world", and in cases where it's not obvious how that should be applied the 5 of us would decide. The researchers would have significant financial upside but it would be uncorrelated to what they build, which should eliminate some of the conflict (we'll pay them a competitive salary and give them YC equity for the upside). We'd have an ongoing conversation about what work should be. about what sort of constraints the world needs for safefy." I'm happy to leave you off as a signatory. I also suspect that after it's out more people will be willing to get behind it. Sam From: Elon Musk Sent: Wednesday, June 24, 2015 11:06 PM 575 : 282 (→
Internal Tech Emails @TechEmails Sam Altman emails Elon Musk June 24, 2015 1) The mission would be to create the first general Al and use it for individual empowerment-ie, the distributed version of the future that seems the safest. More generally, safety should be a first-class requirement. 2) I think we'd ideally start with a group of 7-10 people, and plan to expand from there. really helpful for getting work pointed in the right direction getting the best people to be part of it. Ideally you'd come by and talk to them about progress once a month or whatever. We generically call people involved in some limited way in YC "part-time partners" (we do that with Peter Thiel for example, though at this point he's very involved) but we could call it whatever you want. Even if you can't really spend time on it 1:33 PM Mar 1, 2024 · 57.2K Views 14 187 the foundation and used "for the good of the world", and in cases where it's not obvious how that should be applied the 5 of us would decide. The researchers would have significant financial upside but it would be uncorrelated to what they build, which should eliminate some of the conflict (we'll pay them a competitive salary and give them YC equity for the upside). We'd have an ongoing conversation about what work should be. about what sort of constraints the world needs for safefy." I'm happy to leave you off as a signatory. I also suspect that after it's out more people will be willing to get behind it. Sam From: Elon Musk Sent: Wednesday, June 24, 2015 11:06 PM 575 : 282 (→

Elon Musk vs. Sam Altman / OpenAI Lawsuit
openai sam altman

Wired For War

Jash Dholani @oldbooksguy. 5h Elon is simultaneously fighting the world's biggest search engine (Google), the richest film studio ever (Disney), the planet's most powerful government (USA), and the most valuable Al company (OpenAI). Guess he wasn't kidding when he told Walter Isaacson: "I'm wired for WAR"
Jash Dholani @oldbooksguy. 5h Elon is simultaneously fighting the world's biggest search engine (Google), the richest film studio ever (Disney), the planet's most powerful government (USA), and the most valuable Al company (OpenAI). Guess he wasn't kidding when he told Walter Isaacson: "I'm wired for WAR"

Elon Musk vs. Sam Altman / OpenAI Lawsuit
openai sam altman

Making World A Better Place

KeiOx @Kei0x Elon vs OpenAl pretty much I don't know about you people, but I don't wanna live in a world where someone else makes the world a better place better than we do. :
KeiOx @Kei0x Elon vs OpenAl pretty much I don't know about you people, but I don't wanna live in a world where someone else makes the world a better place better than we do. :

Elon Musk vs. Sam Altman / OpenAI Lawsuit
openai sam altman