2017 UK Election - Didn't Lose as Much

PROTIP: Press the ← and → keys to navigate the gallery, 'g' to view the gallery, or 'r' to view a random image.

>When you lose a general election but pretend you won because you didn't collapse as badly as people thought you would against a party running on a platform of killing foxes and stealing old people's homes. Labour 'M WITH CORBYN

View Gallery Random Image

Top Comments

Aramaki_1917

Jun 10, 2017 at 11:41AM EDT

May called the snap election in order to practically kill the labor party. She aimed for a double-digit majority. She wanted to gain total control not just from her party, but of all UK. It was a phyrric victory for the History books.

Labour was expected to lose so badly, the party would implode and shatter. Now Labour looks strong, hopeful and confident, miles above the Conservatives. Political battles are more complex than it seems. So, overall this was an extremally important strategic victory for Labor. In the next elections (surely very soon), I am pretty sure he will be elected PM.

+25

Vomkrieg

Jun 11, 2017 at 08:27PM EDT in reply to Areskrieger

Sure, they lost, but no one actually won this election. It’s a Rocky story, where the underdog, heavily favoured to be crushed by the champ actually goes the full rounds and loses on decision. Sure, the champ won, but people are cheering for the underdog no one gave a chance to win for putting on a good fight.

+ Add a Comment