![If#NeoGAF were a human being, it would be an adult this year. Maybe that's why the mods aren't interested in it any more. NeoGAF BELIEVE Type of site Gaming Available in English Owner Created by Jim Cordeira Website neogat.com/forum/四 Alexa rank ▲ 1,828 (June 2017)[1] CommercialYes Registration Optional & Free Launched 999; 18 years ago (as Gaming-Age Tyler Malka Forums) Current status 503 Service Unavailable 2:57 AM-22 Oct 2017](https://i.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/original/001/306/843/814.png "18 years")
+56
18 years
Uploaded by Havoc Crow Oct 23, 2017 at 04:30PM EDT
Origin Entry: NeoGAF
File type: png
Resolution: (673px x 668px)
File size: 155 KB
More:
![ETHICS [Ethics] Kotaku/Jason Schreier Knew About Malka's Bar Groping Incident for at Least Two Years. They Sat on the Information and Gave Him a Softball AMA Instead. (self.KotakuinAction) submitted a minute ago by kryptoniankoffee Proof: http://archive.is/pyJkvio (Proof is in the comment/questions of the un-archived version) The above is an AMA that Kotaku/Jason Schreier did with Tyler Malka in 2015, with less than 200 questions/replies Most of the AMA questions pointing out that Tyler inadvertently admitted to assaulting a woman in a bar in Spain, including some that linked to archives of a thread where he banned the user who called out his behavior, remained "pending" during Jason Schreier's AMA with Malka two years ago, but at least one of the questions was approved, but not asked Here are examples of questions asked during the AMA that are still pending if you visit the page today: "You admitted to sexually assaulting a woman in public. Why isn't Kotaku asking this hypocrite the tough questions? Any other Gawker site would take advantage of this opportunity." "Definitely. Here's the imgur and archive link to back up what you're saying: http://imgur.com/a/eBPYml2) and https://archive.today/zeEX1l3]" "Hi Tyler. I was hoping that you can tell me more about the accusations of sexual assualt leveled against you http://imgur.com/v2mCXDp,dcI5G8.. .41 I find it difficult to support a forum that is run by someone who knowingly assaults women." Again, you can still find those questions/comments on the site currently, which means Schreier had information of Malka's misconduct spoonfed to him during the AMA, with archives, and sat on it for two years. Now Kotaku is supposedly writing an article exposing Malka, and we're supposed to believe they're doing this as paragons of journalistic integrity? Never trust these people, and never forget who they really are](https://i.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/newsfeed/001/306/731/0e0.jpg "They knew")
Image Details
1,705 views (0 from today)
Uploaded Oct 23, 2017 at 04:30PM EDT
Origin Entry
Source
Tags
About the Uploader
Top Comments
AbradolfLincler
Oct 24, 2017 at 04:03AM EDT
aceofscarabs
Oct 24, 2017 at 01:24PM EDT