Top Comments

Ducc
Ducc

in reply to Kenaron

No you're not. It's just BS ambiguous syntax which some people insist to read as 48/2*(9+3). After simplification it's supposed to be 48/2*12, which does equal 288.
Even different calculators supposedly get it either right or wrong, so says this article.

+8

+ Add a Comment

Comments (10)


Display Comments

Add a Comment


Hi! You must login or signup first!