Namaste! You must login or signup first!

Source? Source? Source? Do you have a source on that? copypasta deboonker Do you have a source on that? Source? A source. I need a source. Sorry, I mean I need a source that explicitly states your argument. This is just tangential to the discussion. No, you can't make inferences and observations from the sources you've gathered. Any additional comments from you MUST be a subset of the information from the sources you've gathered. You can't make normative statements from empirical evidence. Do you have a degree in that field? A college degree? In that field? Then your arguments are invalid. No, it doesn't matter how close those data points are correlated. Correlation does not equal causation. Correlation does not equal causation. CORRELATION. DOES. NOT. EQUAL. CAUSATION. You still haven't provided me a valid source yet. Nope, still haven't. I just looked through all 308 pages of your user history, figures I'm debating a glormpf supporter. A moron.

+1

Source? Source? Source? Do you have a source on that? copypasta deboonker


Uploaded by Loreil Jan 10, 2021 at 01:09PM EST

Share Pin Download More

Origin Entry: Deboonker

File type: png

Resolution: (2556px x 5835px)

File size: 933 KB


What's happening US national news - Last night There is no evidence that traditional architecture is more beautiful than anti-traditional architecture, fact-checkers say wow that building is beautif- "SOURCE???????"
2+2=4 Source? That's misinformation! The answer was never 4. I learned the answer is actually 5. Your source is not on the list of trusted and credible sources. Is it peer reviewed? Going to need a trusted source on that. That's been debunked. It's not your job to think! Do you have a degree in this subject matter? It is not for you or I to truly understand, just trust the experts. Correlation does not equal causation. Are you going to tell me the earth is flat next? I trust the experts. I hate your guts. Actually... It's a private company, if they want to ban you for saying 4 they are allowed to But you are not an expert. You've been fact checked! Snopes says... Check out this article explaining it's 5. Are you in a cult? That source doesn't count, I said trusted source. Those are just coincidences making it appear like 4. Unless you have a trusted source, we're done here.
MEresearcherss Pee professor's research:perts aglerahtS Iiperts expert estimatesrNew Study Showsirs fouhues Sund that This Scientists Ha ela Show recenstudy finds Research suggests explain cate arg ed New Studies Show says major study schola Researchera study t peswe C-d researchers say Ws Earchers found Se@study indicates udymnds Psced Answ study indicate Show EXperts we Res fchsugPeer revie That New Studies Show Rexpert estim study finds Erpert study Iearwa ew studięs Study may explain A. Recent sdies show Hstudiesor'sceal New SNesy Showe Research ggests The rUstasked experts Arecent study AT Experts weigh in. This research indicates Researcher Study fin India Scjentisis Haye Discovered essor's research: Sdy SSome argued basanalysts rdies Si gests EXPERTS: W Stu researchers found igin. Show study many expérts agreed that ew stues scholars studying/ adies A 2015 study found that me ardted Experts weighin stedy finds Oe argue Scienfists Haąve Di authors ofie2019 study Study shows adies hanyxpertsagreed tl Experts weigh in cherschere found Study A 2015 Nefound Inat
View All 28 Images

Load 2 Comments

Moar:

1
+1

Deboonker - Source? Source? Source? Do you have a source on that? copypasta deboonker

PROTIP: Press the ← and → keys to navigate the gallery, 'g' to view the gallery, or 'r' to view a random image.


◄ Previous View Gallery Random Image Next ►

More:


+ Add a Comment

Comments (2)


Display Comments

Add a Comment


+ Add an Image

Image Details

12,556 views (8 from today)

Uploaded Jan 10, 2021 at 01:09PM EST

Origin Entry

Deboonker

Tags

deboonker, source?, source, debunker, wojak, copypasta

Claim Authorship Edit History
Textile Embed