Kotaku - Its ok when we do it

"and has defended known sexual misconduct perpetrators like John Lasseter"

I feel like opening with that or the like would have been a better idea than just simply "anti-social justice youtube channel"; might have been prevented exactly this from happening.

Just because your target is valid doesn't mean that the cancelling isn't actively happening.
The thing being mocked here is Kotaku obviously attacking somebody for having stupid opinions despite claiming that they don't do that. Does our mockery of Kotaku instantly free the guy they're attacking from all guilt of being some boomer with shit opinions? Obviously not.