-
Nobody Is As Ready For Pillowy Mounds Of Mashed Potatoes As Uncle Phil -
'Thanksgiving Grandma' Plans To Reunite With Mistaken Friend For The 9th Year Since 2016 -
Blessed By The Gift Of Prophecy, This Headline By 'The Onion' Has Been An Inspiration For Schadenfreude Memes -
People Are Joking About How Korean Mahwa 'The Ki Sisters' Is Like 'Baki For Women' -
The Slang Term 'Degen' Has Become A Staple Of Meme And Crypto Culture Over The Past Few Years
+1
"You can put a lightbulb in your mouth but you can't actually take it out again without breaking it" is a legit infohazard
Uploaded by Philipp Aug 04, 2023 at 08:40PM EDT
infohazard information hazard lightbulb
Origin Entry: Infohazard
File type: jpg
Resolution: (975px x 733px)
File size: 289 KB
Moar:
![WOODWARD_CRUZER1970 @bartsimsonreal ! CLASS IV INFOHAZARD DO NOT UNDER ANY CIRCUMSTANCES RESEARCH [REDACTED], FAMED CREATOR OF THE ELECTRIC HEDGEHOG POKEMON SONICHU 12:49 PM Jul 30, 2021](https://i.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/newsfeed/002/635/330/66e.jpg "DO NOT UNDER ANY CIRCUMSTANCES RESEARCH [REDACTED], FAMED CREATOR OF THE ELECTRIC HEDGEHOG POKEMON SONICHU")
![Information Hazards: A Typology of Potential Harms from Knowledge Abstract Nick Bostrom Faculty of Philosophy & Oxford Martin School Oxford University [Published in Review of Contemporary Philosophy, Vol. 10 (2011): pp. 44-79] www.nickbostrom.com Information hazards are risks that arise from the dissemination or the potential dissemination of true information that may cause harm or enable some agent to cause harm. Such hazards are often subtler than direct physical threats, and, as a consequence, are easily overlooked. They can, however, be important. This paper surveys the terrain and proposes a taxonomy. 1. Introduction There is, these days, a commonly held presumption in favor of knowledge, truth, and the uncovering and dissemination of information. It is rare find somebody who self-identifies as an obscurantist or who openly espouses obscurantism as a legitimate policy instrument of wide utility. Even reactionaries rarely object to this general favoring of information. Consider some particularly intransigent creationist who opposes the teaching of evolution theory in public schools. He does not constitute a counterexample. For he does not believe that evolution theory is a truth to be concealed. Rather, he believes evolution theory an error that ought to be replaced with more accurate information. Therefore, although he happens unwittingly to stand in the way of truth, he need not disagree with the claim that the truth should be promoted. The creationist, too, is a truth- lover, albeit one whose affections are unreciprocated. Although nobody makes a brief for ignorance generally, there are many special cases in which ignorance is cultivated-in order, for example, to protect national security, sexual innocence, jury impartiality; to preserve anonymity for patients, clients, reviewers, and voters; to create suspense in films and novels; to protect trade secrets; to measure the placebo effect and avoid various](https://i.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/newsfeed/002/635/326/252.jpg "Information Hazards: A Typology of Potential Harms from Knowledge by Nick Bostrom")
+1
Infohazard - "You can put a lightbulb in your mouth but you can't actually take it out again without breaking it" is a legit infohazard
| ◄ Previous | View Gallery Random Image | Next ► |
![Information Hazards: A Typology of Potential Harms from Knowledge Abstract Nick Bostrom Faculty of Philosophy & Oxford Martin School Oxford University [Published in Review of Contemporary Philosophy, Vol. 10 (2011): pp. 44-79] www.nickbostrom.com Information hazards are risks that arise from the dissemination or the potential dissemination of true information that may cause harm or enable some agent to cause harm. Such hazards are often subtler than direct physical threats, and, as a consequence, are easily overlooked. They can, however, be important. This paper surveys the terrain and proposes a taxonomy. 1. Introduction There is, these days, a commonly held presumption in favor of knowledge, truth, and the uncovering and dissemination of information. It is rare find somebody who self-identifies as an obscurantist or who openly espouses obscurantism as a legitimate policy instrument of wide utility. Even reactionaries rarely object to this general favoring of information. Consider some particularly intransigent creationist who opposes the teaching of evolution theory in public schools. He does not constitute a counterexample. For he does not believe that evolution theory is a truth to be concealed. Rather, he believes evolution theory an error that ought to be replaced with more accurate information. Therefore, although he happens unwittingly to stand in the way of truth, he need not disagree with the claim that the truth should be promoted. The creationist, too, is a truth- lover, albeit one whose affections are unreciprocated. Although nobody makes a brief for ignorance generally, there are many special cases in which ignorance is cultivated-in order, for example, to protect national security, sexual innocence, jury impartiality; to preserve anonymity for patients, clients, reviewers, and voters; to create suspense in films and novels; to protect trade secrets; to measure the placebo effect and avoid various](https://i.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/list/002/635/326/252.jpg "Information Hazards: A Typology of Potential Harms from Knowledge by Nick Bostrom")
Comments (0)
Add a Comment
Image Details
402 views (7 from today)
Uploaded Aug 04, 2023 at 08:40PM EDT
Origin Entry
Source
About the Uploader
Philipp
Memesplainer
There are no comments currently available.
Display Comments