April 2025 4chan Sharty Hack And Janitor Email Leak
Sakshi Rakshale • 2 days ago
![[-] lolpenisbot -1 points 26 minutes ago lol penis permalink save parent report give gold reply + [-] lo!penisbot -1 points 25 minutes ago lol penis permalink save parent report give gold reply [-) lo!penisbot -1 points 24 minutes ago lol penis permalink save parent report give gold reply + [-] lo!penisbot -1 points 24 minutes ago lol penis permalink save parent report give gold reply 个[-] 10!penisbot -1 points 23 minutes ago lol penis permalink save parent report give gold reply skarchomp: fawnbro: the word penis with Tol penis' and didn't realise it would also pick up on its own comments "Of design he created thus; his own waste providing his own food, and all that he did or suffered taking place in and by himself." -Plato, 360 BC](https://i.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/original/000/925/182/df3.png "\"Lol Penis\"")
+28
"Lol Penis"
Uploaded by The Grim Heaper Mar 05, 2015 at 11:28PM EST
Origin Entry: Reddit
File type: png
Resolution: (654px x 712px)
File size: 122 KB
More:
![Scavenger Hunt of Awesomeness LIVE 515 viewers POP NOTIFICATIONS 33 minutes ageo Here's the Princeton box with its discoverer! resources OIMGUR An epic worldwide scavenger hunt put on by redditors. Get all the details here discussions Scavenger Hunt of Awesomeness comments |/r/live [live] Scavenger Hunt of Awesomeness 0 comments |/r/getIT123 updated by u/5days u/Drunken_Economist u/Ocrasorm and 6 more report a rule violation The infernor a thing us](https://i.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/newsfeed/000/867/228/079.png "079.png")
![Or what's the oolest/fmlashiest thing you've seen a GS do? 60 “mments submitted at 20:59:47 on Aug 20, 2014 by ms anedst put holy water on my junk and 5σ ewed a 5ucabus to death. Darmon or not, if I was your GM, that would have nstantly dianged your agarant to 'EM" regardess of what you'd done before. Probably would have not let you go EDIT: A flask of holy water does 2d4 damage... A sucaubus has 84 health. On average, you'd have to have reappied the holy water roughly 17 tmes just to gat har to o HP, and then 4 more times as they have 20 CON. That's f------ hornifying m.an. What the f---? Did you xpect him to only trust ona? ( *) succubi usa "acts of passon·to dan the energy from ther prey. This s basicaly a method of survival αnsumption that may, or may not, be stridby noassay. If he ware jabbing an aod power sword into the mouth of a dragon (othar than a black dragon), as it attemp ted to eat him, there would be no question of impropriaty. So Becusejabbing the aad power sword into the mouth of the dragon would be quidk; fudking a sunbus to death with holy water would take far longr, and would require the sumubus to be hepless (such as tad up) and then the... "utionar"... would would have to f-- her to death ovar the course of several minutes at hast, reapplyng the holy water about 21 times, and contrue to f--- h『as hα nsides turn to sludge. No doubt th would prompt some fairly horrifying saeans of pan from the suco bus which the exea toner would then nore. Don't get me wrong; if he had put holy watar on his sdlong as a defonse modansm ag괘nst the suonbus, and thon stabbed hor while she was reakng from the But praneditatad GX trana torture-r--- that mntinues until he sgures she's dead? Dude, that's sd. Doesn't matter how evil the sucubus s, that sort of thing quite samply not something a Good 〔or evonatra) aligned person does. Its vary obviously an act. Tm sorry, but I can't seam to fnd the rules on f------ a suomibus to death with holy water lube. what page is that on? What damage dioe does it use? I an only find the r >A drect hit by a flask of holy water deals 2d4 points of damage to an undead creature or an evil outsider Yeah, there's no opick rude on it. You know, weat that means? tt meㄺs Rule。trumps. we ar, only work o" of the rformation given, as we have no id:ea how the OMresolved it. we only know he did a 'tade to black and said it worked. Personaly, 1 ike to think he Rule O'd that the succubus screamed and melted, a la the wicked Witch of the West, but you're welcome to your interpretation. I think it's unlikely that he ruled 버atin 뾔e of bσeen period, the d aracter broke out the manades and ②nsnaaky reapplied kbe untihe f----- K to death on 204 damage a round, as anyone that and would undoubtedy undermine te fade-to-back by domandng grapple decks, strength and escape tist decks, and maybe breaking out the FATAL ruleset, just for completaness sake 1-1 I was just using the damage dioe given there; 204 damage, giving an average of S damage for a direct hit, and then taking a normal sucoubus heath (84, I rk k was) and figuring out how many direct hits on average she could take. Fading to black just hㅲdwaves 버e detals of it.. Handy for wh,ㅲ you don't wort to or don't need to consid it, but if you do, then what I preseted would be the most straghtforward way to do it; apply holy wate, d--- it until she apparantly stops 9σ eating (mp lying the holy water is gone), rnse repeat The guy who posted did not mantion anything out manades at al, so unless you were also a player r that campaign, we an't assume that was induded. Fade-to-black would not have worked in that sonao ㄲere is no fuding way the sumbus woukd just le stil dunng that, and you annot kait wit a inga application (itd be ike trying to coup-de-gracoing a dragon with a dagger while it sloaps... Sure, it might do some damaga, but you would not be bla to kli it with nothing but the dagger). Using the rules as best you an the best thign you can do in out-of-rues situation Wce that. So yeah, grappling hecks, stranght checks, probably a ful fledged combat (unless he had her restrained) would be the most realistic thing that'd happen Aso, you are the one who seem to want to twis t Pathfinder into Fatal, using r--- as an instakil weapon... If you were the GM and nuled it like that, what wouid prevent the players from doing it again to instakill any suabus they enounter? Or anything ese vanerable to that. Or hey, maybe just get something immune to aod and then do the same just wht normal aod! Humans would be way easier to deal with ike that, don't you think? No, ayone who consi s this even remotely okay should take a moment to tirk西out what they a. actually advocating: prolonged torture and r---, during which the subject is screaming in agony, and then continuing after htey pass out fom the pain unil they stop breathing ト] He knowingly d wilngly engaged with a σeature with the expidt rtent onkiling her via r---. Pσ3pectve my ass, he's fud ng evi, and he doesn't have was he though the Sumbus was the one to suggest 5ex in the first place, he yust defrded himself by poisonng t weapon, if the sumbus hadn't tried to drain his ife- force through sex and basically attempt to murder him, he wouldn't have f----- her with holy watesr He saved himself and countless others from her effects. The creature was the one dong the r4ng. it's iteraly the equndert of using that emet power to to poison your fesh to defend form when dragon eats you, and then arresting the chemist for poisoning the dragon.Just becaus e the aldhemist knowingy did it on purpose, doesn't make him the bad guy here He has a fuding gur. Hechose, instead, to r---』aeature to death in the most agoniang way he “udon short nooal y the f--- are you trying ape? Because it's not r---. Yes he αuldve have tried fight ng it, but ther, the suoo bus could've run away, or worse. He aeated a tr卲for the sucubus as it tried to r--- him, that pretty much ensured victory. And ike others are pointing out, the succubus was iterally trying to r--- him to death. He wasn't the one in that group that woke up that day and thought "Hmm, I'm gonna trick a few guys into having sex with me And lke I've been trying to say, it's not black and white. I agree that it ould be more axcessve than soma other plans to atch it off guard but it's not 100% ed. ist boa usa'm saying that doesn't mean I think it wa; a good act, Ike you seem to be assuming rm saying. rm just tryng to say that it's not noonssarty something that warrants maing your daracter eel for dong it. It was antraly 100% the suoatus' fat for that happening, and Id deiniboly slot it as Noutral in my book as his actions were entrely reactionary. If he was a good character I woulde probably slotted him down to neutral, or panaized him some other way, but if he was aready neutral, I would've let it side just fine We realy don't know anything from the brief sentence desaibing the event. Gun or no gun? R--- or no r---? Intant on the part of the player? Howe", te possiblity ex sts that he had no gun and that it was not an act of r--- Uniess someone has ns σ knowledge of the game. .. Also, I think a twide-toe p례adr could totally pull this off as a defensive measure wit, some duration erharang metamagc. So he's not evil because he liter ally did what a Chao tic Evil areature was going to do to him, despite it being an overtly evil action, because he can't apparently just draw a gun and shoot her in the face ust to get ths der, te gunslinger r---- a σeature to death and you're trying to pu off Olympic-level mental gymnastics to say that r----- ature to death isnt evil because she asked for it. I don't know, it'd basically equate to tor turing an evil areature. While still an evil act, keep in mind that you can do some evil acts without a change of alignment, I m.ean, nobody but a paladin is good aW the time. If he was neutral, Id let it pass with no questions asked Yeah it's like burning their loins aive, but what about whan a wizard casts a basic aad spell and such, if you think about it, a lot of things you can do normally would be considered pretty bru tal. And if you already would use holy water aganst tham normally, what's so evil about doing it in a weak spot? I mean, it's their fault for getting into that position anyways. It might be a d--- move to stab a guy in the nuts, but this creature was far from innocant. I mean,I cn think of far worse things you an do to aguy that is still considered ok by Pathfindar than doling out the ironic punishment of f------ a f--- damon to deach. e youre r----- them both sides consented and ware planningeach other's murder before tha xaeven on the tabl. What's so dffarent batwean you murdaring tham now with holy water, which would ve bean considered perfectly alright to do and just as painful and whatnot, and murdering them than with holy water when she was t off the fact that they ware having sax is irr levant given the craimstances. Yes, if this person evar did an equivalant to someone ese that wasn't going to murder then, it'd be evi as fud. And rm not sang t's 100% not ed, as it's stil slightly mora torturous than a normal ambat might be. But based on how agmant works in Pathfindar, at the vary least a Neutral character could easty get away with it with no algnment problams. This is no difforent than an asaesin using sex to get dose to someone to murder them. Hall, that's basically what the succubus would've done had she not been stopped, but wth mind-control and s--- you'ro aguy in The reason why I would instantly change this guys algnement woudl be that the torture would have to be planned of holy water. And than, to do as he stated he did, he would have to r--- her with aod until she died. That's at least 2 minutes and 6 so nds if you only count a As for using othar aod stuff That's not the evi part. Casting瀏aod spol, or throwng aval of holy water at a domon self-defense, or even offense, isn't e ! Stabbing a guy in the nuts would be a d--- move, but notevil Pouring aad over them while he was tied pull off ike this ongσ tha that too. t mearty this evil several minutes until he dies of shock and blood lbss, the fact that vtat the poster did: would neos ey i 5everal minutes and be preplanned that makes this such It could be worse though; I do not know the guys mo tives for killing the sucoubus such. If there was aparticular reason for doing so, then... well, I would need know that reason to judge. But, if sword and “up-de-graced her when he got her bed up, instead of 51owdy torturing to death etty clear that he didn't d f that. The DM just made it an instant this it was like, or dse th would've allowed a fade to bladk without some grapple checks and I highly doubt he had a bunch of holy water just lying round that he was able to sneak into the F you did all that stuff, then yeah it would be evl, but they obviously didin't consider that, so in this instance it was just a deaver way to kill a demon with 1 va of holy Of maybe when it faded to black he just dumped a budket of holy water on her face and kolled her that way, sesing as everyone here is interpreting the events differently when no actual detak have been given. 2d4 is how much it hurts trom the outside. Td rule it's worse inside. The equivaent of a freball on your shiald va. In your mouth. at the very least the equivalent of an auto arit. Id say you hit the weak spot for massive damage Unless t k北thom nstanty, its 데 pretty horrifying. Even double the damage (4d4) would mean you'd be down to about 10 reappkatons of holy water. And for the first and last time in her life, the sucaubus' loins burnt for a mortal The Boys And Crash- Not realy. She was trying to tempt the party, s0 1 obliged. I just have in ter esting tas te in lube We did a fade to black after Istar ted, the GM gave me points for creativity - CearyDigit-3 Points 05618 21 August C-1 Nope. We were fairly new to the game and it didn't ocour to him People don't say those ant-rapespiked condom things are r---. Same thing in my book h-------- this is amazing. 2013- Not associated with reddit](https://i.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/newsfeed/000/840/443/8ff.png "8ff.png")
![H yishan [S,A] 86 points 57 minutes ago* @2x2 Ok, here it is: CAVEAT: KEEP IN MIND THAT THIS PLAN COULD TOTALLY FAIL We are thinking about creating a cryptocurrency and making it exchangeable (backed) by those shares of reddit, and then distributing the currency to the community. The investors have explicitly agreed to this in their investment terms Nothing like this has ever been done before. Basically we have to nail down how to do each step correctly (it is technically, legally, and financially complex), though in our brief consultation with an ex-SEC lawyer, he stated he could find nothing illegal about this plan. Nevertheless, there are something like 30 different things we have to pull off to make this work, so we're going to try (Also, I know this totally contradicts what I said over here but that was before Sam proposed this plan to me, and the idea of being able to distribute ownership of reddit back to the community a long-held dream of many of us, frankly is important enough to try and do this) Again, we want to emphasize that this plan is in its earliest stages right now and could totally fail (if it does, we will find another way to get the shares to the community somehow), but we are going to try it because... well, because we are reddit and we do these kinds of things permalink save parent report give gold reply](https://i.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/newsfeed/000/840/229/8d2.png "8d2.png")
![https://archive.is/aODGa SHITREDDITSAYS comments related IMETA] submitting np links to SRS is now banned (self.ShitRedditSays) submitted 13 hours ago*by ArchangelleStrudelle OF OUR BRD'S FACE stickied post -68 Just cuz they're annoying and pointless. From now on if you submit a "no participation" link to np.reddit.com a robot will remove it and send you a message Also, friendly reminder that commenting in linked threads is a-OK and has never been against SRS rules or against reddit's rules Edit: also this script will automatically change np links to normal links on the rest of reddit. Although you have to edit it to work with https P.S. don't vote in linked threads 31 comments share](https://i.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/list/000/977/759/c7c.png_large "NP links")
![Apple: Creates 999$ metal L Reddit: [anger]](https://i.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/list/001/500/456/54e.jpg "Reddit: Angry Penguin of Madagascar")
Image Details
3,184 views (5 from today)
Uploaded Mar 05, 2015 at 11:28PM EST
Origin Entry
About the Uploader
The Grim Heaper
Curator & Conversationalist & Media Bus Boy
Textile Embed
Today's Top Image Galleries
Legal Information: Know Your Meme ® is a trademark of Literally Media Ltd . By using this site, you are agreeing by the site's terms of use and privacy policy and DMCA policy .
© 2007-2025 Literally Media Ltd.