17 Squares In A Larger Square meme.

What Is The '17 Squares In A Larger Square' Meme? The 'Ugly Math' Problem Explained

Either you love math or absolutely hate everything related to it. Whether you're still in school or have graduated a long time ago, the memory of sleepless nights before exams can still be there to haunt you. That said, this article will fumble its way about a certain viral math theory that shows the most efficient and compact way to fit 17 squares in a larger square.

Bored yet? Let me tell you how the internet did its magic and transformed this subject into a series of funny memes on Twitter.

What Is The '17 Squares In A Larger Square'?

Before we discuss this meme, we have to take a detour back to 1998, when John Bidwell, an undergraduate student at the University of Hawaii, solved a math problem on how to pack equal squares in a larger square. This solution inspired Twitter user @KangarooPhysics to post a series of tweets (see below) in 2021 about "The best known packings of N equal circles into a square and a circle."

Daniel Piker @Kangaroo Physics Dec 10, 2021 The best known packings of N equal circles into a square and a circle. 20 4 25 7 61 t 281 9 36 ● 91 16 19 37 1,564 49 127 la ↑ Daniel Piker @KangarooPhysics Seeing that this is the best way we know to fit this many equal squares inside a square makes me feel a bit better about struggling to fit the plates in the dishwasher! 17. S s = 4.675+ Found by John Bidwell in 1997. 5:14 AM Dec 10, 2021 :


How Did '17 Squares In A Larger Square' Become A Meme On Twitter?

Aesthetics is everything, especially on the internet. So when Twitter users discovered the image of non-organized squares inside a larger square with the text "best known packings of square," it caused an uproar of memes on the platform. Twitter user @eigenrobot was one of the first to rise against the math problem with a quote tweet from 2021 saying, "vaguely offensive act by God if this holds up."

eigenrobot @eigenrobot Dec 11, 2021 vaguely offensive act by God if this holds up Daniel Piker @Kangaroo Physics · Dec 10, 2021 Seeing that this is the best way we know to fit this many equal squares inside a square makes me feel a bit better about struggling to fit the plates in the dishwasher! Show this thread 17. O 48 S = 4.675+ Found by John Bidwell in 1997. 1 45 736 da ↑ :


The image was then left untouched for a few years until @KangarooPhysics decided to repost the subject on February 2023, bringing back hoards of unsatisfied people with the lack of aesthetics in the math solution. Twitter user @NathanpmYoung declared that "God is dead and the most efficient way to pack 17 squares into a square killed him."


Nathan is in SF (say hi ) @NathanpmYoung god is dead and the most efficient way to pack 17 squares into a square killed him Traduzir Tweet 17. s = 4.675+ Found by John Bidwell in 1997. 8:16 PM - 14 de fev de 2023 1,3 mi Visualizações


Well, if you're still here and want to learn more about the optimal packing of 17 equal squares into larger square warfare, TikToker @saxxie.dev delves a bit further into why this math solution is considered "ugly math."

@saxxie.dev #stitch with @lili0235wm8 If u like packing problems hmu #math #categorytheory #compositionality ♬ Paradise – Ikson



For the full history of the quote, be sure to check out our entry on the 17 squares in a larger square for even more information.




Comments (0)

Display Comments

Additional comments have been disabled.


Yo Yo! You must login or signup first!