>I have a feeling with how so many companies operate on the premise of if you don't spend a million dollars a year on a budget next year they'll let their budget slashed, not future proofing their business, refusing to change with the times chances are we're going to see another decade of this economic funk before things get better.
Not just companies. This is actually the biggest problem that affects public-services sector efficiency. One of the major reasons why public services are so slow to update themselves technologically (just a quick look into how long it takes state-and-local .govs to actually utilize new innovation in tech and websites), is because any increase in efficiency means ultimately: less people, smaller budgets. I'm not sure how DMVs operate outside of California, but the vast majority of DMV related services can be done remotely, online. Yet only a small few are actually allowable on line, and still frequently require caveats that force you to show up to the DMV offices.
Ultimately, it comes down to this: Justify your position. Justify why you should need this money.
The main difference is that companies calculate earnings 4 times a year, and if there is a shrinkage of earnings, cuts to departments are made. And those cuts are deep, and instantaneous becuse you have literally 3 months to show a turn around.
This is not so with public-money which is generated through taxes, and is always guaranteed. Since public-services do not have a profit-motive to increase efficiency or work-production, there is no incentives to really make any substantial or meaningful cuts…until it becomes so overwhelming that local municipalities have to go bankrupt because they can no longer sustain the expenses.
@Black Graphic T
>Investigate clinton and launch an investigation into Trump's finances.
They wouldn't dare.
I strongly suspect that the major reason why Pelosi won't impeach Trump over financial crimes is because so much of the political establishment is directly and indirectly tied to Trump. In fact, the Democrats owe much to Trump's major contributions to the Democrats in 2006 election. And with Trump's financial empire, how many of these Democrats have ties – especially in New York – to Trump's real estate machinations?
They created an environment where any ties to Trump makes you a heretic to the Democrats and the Left. If this was an impeachment about collusion – there was nothing to tie them to Trump…but financials? Oof.