For about two years now, I've been drawing and posting art on both Newgrounds and here on this site (and also Reddit, if I can find a fitting subreddit), and I would like to know if there's other good websites I could post my art to. Any suggestions?
Forums / Discussion / General
235,500 total conversations in 7,818 threads
Good websites for posting art?
Last posted
Jul 15, 2023 at 01:58AM EDT.
Added
Jun 29, 2023 at 09:23PM EDT
11 posts
from
9 users
Pixiv is good for art, but Newgrounds is still good.
I know deviantArt has a certain reputation (I mean shit that reputation is why I frequent it), but truth is you can just upload "normal" art to it.
I can give you the rundown.
Twitter
Pros: Large art community. Relatively conducive to sharing artwork/creators you like thanks to the retweet system. Will generally take your full-res art without compressing it to hell if you know a few simple tricks for uploading images to it.
Cons: Broken algorithm that can easily screw you over (this is the big one). Funny emerald mine meme man is currently running it into the ground at top speed. Some groups there can be surprisingly insular and unwelcoming (apparently they're in denial about being on one of the most popular websites on Earth). Communities tend not to stay cohesive and sometimes turn toxic due to size. Bots. Dogshit UI/UX.
Tumblr
Pros: Decent art community. The way it's structured means it's better at actually showing you what you tell it to.
Cons: Will jpeg the shit out of your uploads. Kind of a small community nowadays (though this could be a good thing too). Early signs of enshittification are noticeable. Really weird tagging etiquette.
DeviantArt
Pros: Designed specifically for art. Decent tools for artists.
Cons: Awful UX when it comes to finding what you want. The old jokes about lots of low-quality content are true, though this is to be expected from an art website. You will stumble across shit you don't want to see. Money-grubbing premium subscription model. Not a site you should even think about giving money to (remember when they blatantly stole their logo from someone else and everyone forgot in three days?). Full of accounts that just repost other people's stuff and there's not much you can do about it (unless you feel like going through the DMCA process and giving DeviantArt your home address).
Pixiv
Pros: Designed specifically for art. Being followed by someone means they'll surely see your uploads. Built-in commission system.
Cons: Said built-in commission system is vague and confusing. Be ready to figure out what all those Japanese tags mean if you want your stuff to get seen at all. UX isn't great and search system sucks ass. Hilariously greedy premium subscription system that charges for basic website features (including blocking more than around one tag). Nobody there knows how to tag properly, or censor properly for that matter. For all the shit DeviantArt gets for being filled with nasty and/or objectionable content, Pixiv is several orders of magnitude worse. Seriously, there are a lot of tags you learn to stay away from real fast.
ArtStation
Pros: Designed for professional artists.
Cons: Designed for professional artists. That means it's out of reach for hobbyists. Requires you to use your real name, if that's any indication.
Newgrounds
Others would be better at going over this one than I am.
Itaku also looks really promising as well! Some of my fav artists recently moved there!
Tag System that allows blacklists, Filters, Gallery Folders! Overall really good organization
Reddit I guess
Oclaf wrote:
Itaku also looks really promising as well! Some of my fav artists recently moved there!
Tag System that allows blacklists, Filters, Gallery Folders! Overall really good organization
First I've heard of this site but that sounds pretty cool so I checked it out. From a quick scroll through the posts and users list, it seems to be mostly if not entirely populated by furry artists; is that the site's intent or just happenstance?
Anyways, I use pixiv and Twitter. I think pixiv is generally better for making a gallery and maintaining traction for older pieces (e.g. my most liked drawing is from five years ago and is still getting likes to this day); the main disadvantage it has compared to Twitter is that you can't interact with your followers…much.
Edit: The other advantage pixiv has over Twitter is not having the Twitter community on it.
Sugary Salt wrote:
First I've heard of this site but that sounds pretty cool so I checked it out. From a quick scroll through the posts and users list, it seems to be mostly if not entirely populated by furry artists; is that the site's intent or just happenstance?
Anyways, I use pixiv and Twitter. I think pixiv is generally better for making a gallery and maintaining traction for older pieces (e.g. my most liked drawing is from five years ago and is still getting likes to this day); the main disadvantage it has compared to Twitter is that you can't interact with your followers…much.
Edit: The other advantage pixiv has over Twitter is not having the Twitter community on it.
It's meant for all kind of variety art, not just Furry!
It just happened during this period a lot of Anthro artists to move there
1. FurAffinity Mods are smocking ALL the crack and can't be trusted!
2. Twitter being a horrible site for Art in general
3. People want to have Stable gallery archives with easy search
No artist should go through this cesspool called Twitter really!
I might as well take this occasion to point out that you absolutely can upload your artwork here on KYM. There's an option during upload to mark your picture as original work, and also to link to one of your accounts on another website, there's an extensive system of tags and entries for people looking for specific pics, and your personal profile page makes it a bit easier to see the pictures you uploaded.
Of course, this is far from ideal as a main source for an artist. Nsfw of the sexual kind with bulging nipples/cameltoe and beyond is strictly prohibited apart from very specific exceptions, creator exposure is moderate at best, the very nature of KYM means content that is irrelevant to any meme and entry will be frowned upon, and you'll be hard-pressed uploading a gif that doesn't look more compressed than your mom last night, to say nothing on videos. But, the option exists.
Frankly, my main recommandation is that you upload your art on as many websites as you can manage. Not have all your eggs in the same basket.
Triplem wrote:
I might as well take this occasion to point out that you absolutely can upload your artwork here on KYM. There's an option during upload to mark your picture as original work, and also to link to one of your accounts on another website, there's an extensive system of tags and entries for people looking for specific pics, and your personal profile page makes it a bit easier to see the pictures you uploaded.
Of course, this is far from ideal as a main source for an artist. Nsfw of the sexual kind with bulging nipples/cameltoe and beyond is strictly prohibited apart from very specific exceptions, creator exposure is moderate at best, the very nature of KYM means content that is irrelevant to any meme and entry will be frowned upon, and you'll be hard-pressed uploading a gif that doesn't look more compressed than your mom last night, to say nothing on videos. But, the option exists.
Frankly, my main recommandation is that you upload your art on as many websites as you can manage. Not have all your eggs in the same basket.
I've always considered posting some drawings outside of the art thread, so thanks for the reaffirmation! Uploading to as many channels as you can is definitely a good advice.
Twitter and Instagram are the best as a western hobbyist artist at this time.
Both are forgiving towards a newcomer with a backlog and with the size of the sites you're likeliest to find people who are growing alongside you that can be great peers.
You can turn the timelines of both these sites into places where you can consume only art and discover new artists and styles you want to meet or incorporate.
It's also the easiest place to comment, retweet/share and DM and have an artist notice you back since a western hobbyist artist will very likely also have a Twitter/Instagram and check them first. Oftentimes it's a place to know an artist's personality since they are also blogs where they post their interests or host their Discord server that helps to network further.
Twitter and Instagram are places to get noticed and network. Both these sites are incredible places to host commission work because of the hit-and-run nature of where/when people see your posts.
The cons to these sites is that they aren't good portfolio sites. Difficult to host all your art in a gallery. Especially for Twitter.
Also, it's contentious to put all your eggs in a basket on Twitter/Instagram in ways like drawing for one particular fandom, since your account will get marked where if you draw for other content instead of your main one it will get penalized.
Instagram is more difficult for networking and interests if you don't keep up with your follow's stories each day so there's that worry of not being up to date if you miss them.
Twitter's public art communities are way too large and oftentimes toxic that you can get mixed up with the wrong people if you don't play it safe and smart. You HAVE to make a community for yourself and vet it if you want such a thing.
Both these sites have a potential of going belly up especially with Elon Twitter but at this point of time they are very, very good for getting a name out.