Forums / Fun! / Memeory Lane

and i guess everyone is okay with it?

i guess being a sexual deviant and a criminal is fine on kym.

memes are more important

the criminal meme of pedophilia

theyre just anime faggots

[me sitting at my desk at kym corp]

other mod: "hey man, can you ease up a little on the users? you are making the depressed pedophile furries feel bad, thanks."

[me nods respectfully but as soon as they leave i crush the pencil i'm holding into dust]

all 3 of the workers are me

and it was david icke approved blood-drinking-shapeshifting-lizard tactics that enabled blubber to reach this point, what point that is exactly nobodoy really knoes

Who cares I want candy.

ban all pedos
ban all furries
ban all brones
ban all robofuckers
ban everyone.

Sure, it's not like we're breaking any laws. And who gives a crap about morality?

some countries (like my own, canada) have laws against browsing for that kind of stuff so yeah, it is breaking the law buster.

I've always thought people who casually say they're loli/shotacon or any other negative/immoral/creepy thing to be at LEAST (understatement is under) a little weird.

So glad I'm not alone….

I banned peeps for these reasons once.

They were unbanned.

Y'know, I know that people get desensitized to the insanity of the Internet, but being accepting of loli/shotacons are a bit much…

>Assuming anyone is over the age of 12 on KYM
>Somehow a 12 year old can be a Pedo

Natsuru, I think you're confusing loli/shota with loli/shotacon. A loli is a young girl, a shota is a young boy. A lolicon is a grown adult who targets young girls, a shotacon is a grown adult who targets young boys.

No, he isn't. The entire community consists of only 4 year olds.

Except Loli, who is 12.

nice try nats, but possession of these materials is a crime regardless of age.

@MDF

that's insane. which users?

I resent that.
I'm at least 4 and 1/2.

For most they're liking is for fictional underage girls. While that doesn't exactly make it "right", it doesn't entirely make it "wrong".

You remind me of those people who called Pharrell a pedophile for releasing a "super pedophilic" video.

lolicon is a grown adult who targets young girls

Now that's bullshit.

Lolicon or lolita complex: Lolita complex refers to pornographic art, anime on girls aged between 12 to 17. Some times it is used to refer people who are attracted to such art.

Pedophilia: Pedo means child and philis means love, derived from greek. It refers people who have physical attraction towards both young boys and girls.. (while lolita refers to only young girls). Though nowadays pedophilis is much referred to perverts who molest young boys or girls, the actual meaning of pedophilia refers to people those who are just attracted to young boys or girls and does not molest or misbehave with them.

Except Loli, who is 12.

I also remind you that I'm a girl. A super cute 12 years old girl.

this isn't about right or wrong, just legal and illegal, even 2-d materials depicting minors are illegal.

Yeah, I really meant ATTRACTED to, not targeting….. But still. Though I guess I learned a new thing when they are only attracted to drawn girls, not also real ones….

But it's still wrong/creepy to some extent and completely illegal depending on the content.

Even that depends on where you are and how strict the laws are. Not to mention the context. Not every bit of material involving underage characters is gruesomely explicit. Much of it can be harmless, but just happen involve underage characters.

so you want to ban yourself?

if i go down, everyone goes down with me

you sound like a pedophile apologist to be honest. i believe the safety of children is more important than whether or not a two dimensional child's is explicit or "gruesomely" explicit

But it’s still wrong/creepy

Sure, if you say so.

BRB deleting all the CP I have on my computer. Hopefully, the police won't catch me this time.

we have mods who have OPENLY ADMITTED to fucking dogs

who is really at fault here

Bah, at this point I see it's no use argue. I'll just go…

No, I just like to remain somewhat open and neutral with topics like this. What's the sense in arguing if everyone's going to be militantly one sided?

And from what you're implying you're acting as if anyone who's into lolis/shotas (terms that are usually reserved for fictional, anime characters) are automatically gonna go pack outside elementary schools a to pray on kids. Not everyone's cut from the same jib.

lol @ people having serious arguments on a riff raff thread

"Nuh man you dont understand, i gotta defend my underage porn"

Argue? I don't see how saying "IT'S WRONG BECAUSE I THINK IT'S WRONG" can be taken as an argument.

Plot Twist

Oh god Jesus fucking shit, its one of them…… a-a…a paedophile

The police are on their way

pedophiles are criminals.

"remaining neutral" helps the oppressor (pedophiles) not the oppressed (children) so you are doing the world a disservice.

also lol @ using an alt to defend some of the worst individuals of society

Oh look, a Serious Debate thread broke out in this Riff-Raff thread. However, the Riff-Raff is bravely fighting back. Who will claim victory? Only the KYM gods can know.

Who said I'm defending them? I'm fully aware of what it all boils down too, but again, not everyone is cut from the same jib. With that logic, liking gory horror movies makes you a deranged loon who's one bad insult away from going on a killing spree. Or watching movies or hentai's with rape automatically makes you a rapist.

also lol @ suspending someone because you yourself disagree with them.

(Though this is riff raff, so I'm to assume all of this is for the luls)

sirbrownbear sees a man jacking off to a 6 year girl

sirbrownbear (thinking): maybe i should try to get more information about this before i make any rash decisions.

captain blubber sees man jacking off to fictional children

captain blubber (thinking): he's in no way harming anyone and shows no real sign of committing any crimes. clearly he's worse than hitler! him and all those like him! he's clearly doing that because he yurns for the real thing and not because they're drawings.

how is he not harming anyone? at the very least, he is harming himself through masturbation.

how so? he's building up strength in his arm and wrist muscles.

To be fair, those girls are at legal age in my country.

Well it doesn't…

Yeah it's fucked up, but realistically it doesn't affect anyone.

Loli is 12 and three quarters, thank you very much.

The whole its "not real" argument doesn't really hold up too well. The people depicted in those images are children. You are fapping to children. Period. And that's just wrong no matter what way you slice it.

Actually, by giving the people who produce such content web traffic, you're contributing indirectly to the production of such materials by providing the demand for them. It also affects the person doing it because it will always be a part of who they are, no matter how much they hide it.

>its ok to masturbate to underage people because im not directly harming anyone
>i would directly contribute and help people who produce that kind of content because I am not the one harming them so its not my fault nor my responsability.

haha, i knew kym was full of nerds but this is just awful