{ “The Scrappies” on the YMMV section of Know Your Meme’s TV Tropes page (Lisa’s part of that section too). }
I don't know what that means but I wont hear it and I wont respond to it.
63,527 total conversations in 189 threads
Last posted
Apr 08, 2016 at 04:32PM EDT.
Added
Apr 05, 2016 at 09:28AM EDT
102 posts
from
51 users
{ “The Scrappies” on the YMMV section of Know Your Meme’s TV Tropes page (Lisa’s part of that section too). }
I don't know what that means but I wont hear it and I wont respond to it.
lisalombs wrote:
{ “The Scrappies” on the YMMV section of Know Your Meme’s TV Tropes page (Lisa’s part of that section too). }
I don't know what that means but I wont hear it and I wont respond to it.
Will you respond to meme daddy's cummies, squishy?
Epyc wyn is like the Joker at this point. Think he's dead and he's back next issue.
lisalombs wrote:
{ “The Scrappies” on the YMMV section of Know Your Meme’s TV Tropes page (Lisa’s part of that section too). }
I don't know what that means but I wont hear it and I wont respond to it.
Just as an FYI, I'm not the one who adds anything relating to specific users on TV Tropes's Know Your Meme page. I'm the one who added stuff like "In 2015 the site saw a rise in fetish articles" and "Similar to the userbase's dislike of SJWs, people on the extreme opposite end are also mocked for being no better."
lisalombs wrote:
{ “The Scrappies” on the YMMV section of Know Your Meme’s TV Tropes page (Lisa’s part of that section too). }
I don't know what that means but I wont hear it and I wont respond to it.
Whoever added it in wrote it in a very neutral and non-mean spirited way.
Cecaelia Girlie wrote:
Whoever added it in wrote it in a very neutral and non-mean spirited way.
That's pretty much how you have to do it on that site anyway.
As I said, I'm not the person listing specific users under tropes, my edits to that page are only related to articles. Even the more positive leaning comments like "Particle Mare is well liked by the site's userbase" aren't my edits.
If it's any consolation I lost a whole page's worth of editing on the All Your Base Are Belong To Us entry.
So now, instead of doing a full overhaul on the thing, I will do a bare minimum on the entry and move on. Congratulations MScratch, you kept an entry fucked up because you needed to enjoy your illusion of power on a meme site. Someone should work on that entry btw it needs some major improvement especially since it's one of the classic examples of an old-school meme.
Bruh I looked at your editorships and 90% of them is "bare minimum".
If that was overhaul by your standards, I can only imagine you fixing a typo at your bare minimum.
RandomMan wrote:
Will you respond to meme daddy's cummies, squishy?
why must you hurt me in this uncomfortable way
RandomMan wrote:
Bruh I looked at your editorships and 90% of them is "bare minimum".
If that was overhaul by your standards, I can only imagine you fixing a typo at your bare minimum.
Shhh don't ruin his dreams of becoming a mod with all the titles and all badges.
>unbanned
I will be gone until he is banned for real. Later.
Ray Donovan wrote:
>unbanned
I will be gone until he is banned for real. Later.
ok guys let's ban epyc
Dreamworks wrote:
ok guys let's ban epyc
Like I said, go ahead and ban him.
Goddamn, I missed Epyc getting banned, then unbanned? See, this is why I can't leave the internet for a 24-hour period.
Loli wrote:
Shhh don't ruin his dreams of becoming a mod with all the titles and all badges.
You know he's gonna stop contributing once he reached the highest tier on each title.
That's the last type of person I'd want modded.
Seriously, let's just ignore him.
He's not doing anything wrong, but he's obviously a butt for taunting us. Just never take the bait, and pretend everything is bait.
Jill wrote:
Like I said, go ahead and ban him.
we did and look how that went
Mistress Fortune wrote:
And here I was thinking he'd stop ruinin' my threads. It's becoming easier day by day to see why someone added him as one of "The Scrappies" on the YMMV section of Know Your Meme's TV Tropes page (Lisa's part of that section too).
That's supposed to be used for fictional entities. I am fairly certain most TVT mods would delete that whole section upon discovering it because it would flout the "no real life people" rule for certain audience reactions.
Just check out this part: "Molly Horan and Brad, a pair of administrators that constantly upload obnoxious social justice causes and Twitter trends that are never substantial enough to be confirmed." Wow, so impartial. And of course there's the point that just because someone creates an entry, doesn't mean they believe in it/agree with its cause.
"The Scrappy", with regard to real people, should not be on the page to begin with, since there are no fictional characters being reacted against.
[/seriousposting]
Verbose wrote:
Seriously, let's just ignore him.
He's not doing anything wrong, but he's obviously a butt for taunting us. Just never take the bait, and pretend everything is bait.
Bait = Something mods want to hate Epyc Wyn for doing even though it isn't ethically wrong or breaking site rules
A Butt For Taunting Us = Being mad at people who've actively attempted punishing and banning you for not conforming to how they want you to act without correlation to site rules or what's right and wrong
Pretend Everything Is Bait = Ignore him because if we punish him for not actually doing something wrong we might ourselves get in trouble because he doesn't let go of what has been done like most users do
Moderators do something wrong, I criticize them for doing that wrong. If someone does something wrong, I criticize them for doing that wrong. It's not some special hate of people in authority on a meme site, I am applying rightful criticism to legitimately wrong actions that affect me personally.
You know what I haven't gotten?
AN APOLOGY. From literally any moderator on behalf of the mods or at the least on behalf of MScratch for this immensely wrong action built on the basis of many previous wrong actions which have caused me both hours ago and many times before very real depression. Instead I have only received insults and been the butt-end of rude jokes from a great deal of moderators in addition to the userbase which is heavily influenced by the actions of the moderators.
I do not apologize for the anger I have. I only apologize that I cannot convey it in a nicer manner. But I'm still learning, and I admit that is a flaw of mine. But if my criticisms can only be properly conveyed through my feelings and criticisms, then I must be willing to risk looking like a fool because of an improper control of my anger so that my point can at the very least be made.
I am genuinely sorry I express my criticisms in an angry manner. I try hard to be polite about this but I cannot ignore my genuine feelings on the subject. But maybe, these feelings would not exist, if I was not dealing with constant social attacks and punishments, in the first place.
Moderators do something wrong, I criticize them for doing that wrong.
No, you don't. Criticism should be given in a respectful and calm manner. You use and abuse every single chance you have to throw shit at us.
That line you posted on your own thread was completely unrespectful. If you were serious, I believe it should be treated as insult to the mod team and you should be warned for it.
You are passing your blatant antagonism as "genuine critiscim". I do not believe we have to give you any more chances to shit on us anymore.
AN APOLOGY. From literally any moderator on behalf of the mods or at the least on behalf of MScratch for this immensely wrong action built on the basis of many previous wrong actions which have caused me both hours ago and many times before very real depression.
And I want an apology from you as well. For antagonizing us for so damn long, for being unrespecteful to us everytime you had the chance and for badmouthing us and the staff as well.
Go ahead, I'm waiting.
I am genuinely sorry I express my criticisms in an angry manner. I try hard to be polite about this but I cannot ignore my genuine feelings on the subject.
Take a breath and remember, you are breaking the Behave rule to which you are not an exception.
I remind you the rules:
Either you try to express your thoughts in a nicer way or get warned for them.
But maybe, these feelings would not exist, if I was not dealing with constant social attacks and punishments, in the first place.
Your actions are your own and those are what will get you banned for real. Try to not use the community's behavior to justify your wrong-doings.
modaters you guys are jerks for ban
Verbose wrote:
Seriously, let's just ignore him.
He's not doing anything wrong, but he's obviously a butt for taunting us. Just never take the bait, and pretend everything is bait.
Emperor Palpitoad wrote:
Bait = Something mods want to hate Epyc Wyn for doing even though it isn't ethically wrong or breaking site rules
A Butt For Taunting Us = Being mad at people who've actively attempted punishing and banning you for not conforming to how they want you to act without correlation to site rules or what's right and wrong
Pretend Everything Is Bait = Ignore him because if we punish him for not actually doing something wrong we might ourselves get in trouble because he doesn't let go of what has been done like most users do
Moderators do something wrong, I criticize them for doing that wrong. If someone does something wrong, I criticize them for doing that wrong. It's not some special hate of people in authority on a meme site, I am applying rightful criticism to legitimately wrong actions that affect me personally.
You know what I haven't gotten?
AN APOLOGY. From literally any moderator on behalf of the mods or at the least on behalf of MScratch for this immensely wrong action built on the basis of many previous wrong actions which have caused me both hours ago and many times before very real depression. Instead I have only received insults and been the butt-end of rude jokes from a great deal of moderators in addition to the userbase which is heavily influenced by the actions of the moderators.
I do not apologize for the anger I have. I only apologize that I cannot convey it in a nicer manner. But I'm still learning, and I admit that is a flaw of mine. But if my criticisms can only be properly conveyed through my feelings and criticisms, then I must be willing to risk looking like a fool because of an improper control of my anger so that my point can at the very least be made.
I am genuinely sorry I express my criticisms in an angry manner. I try hard to be polite about this but I cannot ignore my genuine feelings on the subject. But maybe, these feelings would not exist, if I was not dealing with constant social attacks and punishments, in the first place.
Emphasis on "try to be polite". You've never once been polite bruh – deactivate, you deserved every punishment that you've gotten so far – you're lucky that the mods are cucked by Don.
Nima wrote:
Emphasis on "try to be polite". You've never once been polite bruh – deactivate, you deserved every punishment that you've gotten so far – you're lucky that the mods are cucked by Don.
Last I checked there was a rule against pasting private messages into forums and when a pm is then made public, would you consider that a polite thing to do? I'm sure you will give a yes followed by a reason I disagree with so here's a better question. Why are you pulling up stuff way in the past from IRC, which I am banned from and nobody can look at the logs of to prove for or against your case? You're just fueling a hateful circlejerk for free karma and an innate desire for you to harm me.
But even then, you have also told me to deactivate and that I deserve every punishment -even ones you have no knowledge of. You and your upvoters likely lacking a proper knowledge of what it means to be polite. Even though I disagree immensely with you and a great many others on this site whom have attacked my character, I have not nor will I ever stoop to the level of telling people they should leave, that everyone hates them, that they're an asshole, or otherwise purposefully try to hurt them. Otherwise I'd be acting in a barbarous harmful manner that can make people depressed in real life. I try very hard to improve people not destroy them like you have been wanting to do to me.
Edit:
@RandomMan that's a legitimate point. The plan is do 60 edits where I add in a couple sections, add some references, and reformat the code of some images and videos to proper site format. Then, I'll go back through them and add lots of references and redo the wording and add information to the paragraphs. And yeah, I'm doing it for a site title that has no value beyond what I give to it. And you know something else? I'm doing it just to prove I can.
Epyc Wyn is Gay lol
upgloats to the right sonnys >>>>>>>>>
Epyc, a word of advice: STOP.
The sole reason everybody hates you is because you constantly attack the moderators and make yourself seem to be the better man. And when both of these things fail (usually at the same time), instead of letting go and moving on, you instead intensify your criticisms and self-defense, despite being proven wrong time and time again.
You won't achieve absolutely anything this way. If you want people to respect you, then stop ranting about how moderators should change, or how the site should be more generous with titles and badges, and instead just contribute. Be it writing entries, uploading and reporting images or discussing politics and controversies, do anything, just stop trying to change the site or attack the moderators. Nobody will respect you if you do.
Last I checked there was a rule against pasting private messages into forums and when a pm is then made public, would you consider that a polite thing to do? I’m sure you will give a yes followed by a reason I disagree with so here’s a better question. Why are you pulling up stuff way in the past from IRC, which I am banned from and nobody can look at the logs of to prove for or against your case? You’re just fueling a hateful circlejerk for free karma and an innate desire for you to harm me.
While I will agree that the PM is insanely old an unrelated, can you proof you didn't do anything wrong? The logs argument works both ways. With logs no longer available, it boils down to witness reports, which I don't fear.
I try very hard to improve people not destroy them like you have been wanting to do to me.
Real improvement starts with oneself.
But tbh you're talking bs, because to go back to a point said by Loli:
"You are passing your blatant antagonism as “genuine critiscim”."
There is no advice or feedback towards improvement in blatant antagonism.
As was said, you use and abuse every chance you have to throw shit at us. Evidence being in this very thread in your reply towards Verbose. He posts the best advice thus far in this thread, and you then use it to shit on him and the rest of the mods. Verbose is a mod who is genuinly interested in helping folks and will never join in on any pissing contest, and your shit flinging reply is how you repay him.
And alongside that, I remember various occassions and even threads where folks genuinly posted advice with the interest to give you a chance to redeem and improve yourself.
You have never done such a thing, on both actually trying to improve folks with advice or heed the advice given to you. The only reply we'll get, like once more now, is that you don't feel sorry for being who you are. If you claim you try to improve, show the fruits of it.
But maybe, these feelings would not exist, if I was not dealing with constant social attacks and punishments, in the first place.
Right back at ya.
You know what I haven’t gotten?
AN APOLOGY. From literally any moderator on behalf of the mods or at the least on behalf of MScratch for this immensely wrong action built on the basis of many previous wrong actions which have caused me both hours ago and many times before very real depression.
If you actually get depressed over these actions, you have my sincerest apologies. One's behavior is no excuse to wish depression over them.
Yet at the same time I will also bring the advice that you are your own worst enemy in that. You know the Bernie and Egoraptor jokes are ill received, yet intentionally continue with them to bait folks. Same for other jokes, and even once more today when you bumped your own thread after it got no replies.
While the behavior some are showing towards you is cancer, the tumor that started it were your own continuous jokes. I can't pity someone who gets burned when they themselves are throwing oil on the fire. If you have no intention to help yourself, we should have no intention to apologise for the results.
To keep this in the spirit of Riff-Raff even one bit:
And yeah, I’m doing it for a site title that has no value beyond what I give to it. And you know something else? I’m doing it just to prove I can.
If the result is entry improvement, I'm not gonna bother with it. Your reasoning is only damaging your reputation and nothing else.
And I will now heed Verbose's advice myself. Thanks for the reminder bro.
ballstothewall wrote:
That's supposed to be used for fictional entities. I am fairly certain most TVT mods would delete that whole section upon discovering it because it would flout the "no real life people" rule for certain audience reactions.
Just check out this part: "Molly Horan and Brad, a pair of administrators that constantly upload obnoxious social justice causes and Twitter trends that are never substantial enough to be confirmed." Wow, so impartial. And of course there's the point that just because someone creates an entry, doesn't mean they believe in it/agree with its cause.
"The Scrappy", with regard to real people, should not be on the page to begin with, since there are no fictional characters being reacted against.
[/seriousposting]
I'm responding to this because I barely give any fucks about the following posts (plus they're too long).
In TvTropes, The Scrappy is not always exclusive to fictional characters. The Scrappy refers to a character, a being, that most of the base dislikes if not downright despise.
Nearly all entries in TVT are, of course, about fictional works, which is why when there's a Scrappy entry added to the YMMV page, it's about fictional characters.
But, TVT also has pages for non-fictional stuff. Such as a KYM page. The rules still apply, only with some changes: The base, becomes KYM's userbase. The Scrappy, is a character most dislike or hate, and in this case, Character=User.
Whether Wyny was real or fictional is completely irrelevant, because in that particular case, they're not talking about a fictional work with fictional characters. KYM is a real website with a real userbase, the userbase mostly dislikes Epyc, with some exceptions, which is why the Scrappy trope effectively applies to him.
We could also optionally use the logic that the one being tagged as the Scrappy is Epyc Win, the KYM user/persona, and not the Real Life person behind said user/persona, thus the trope could still apply even if the "no real life people" rule (that honestly, I've never heard being mentioned or enforced in TVT, ever. Where did you get that idea?) was enforced.
LiveandSound wrote:
I'm responding to this because I barely give any fucks about the following posts (plus they're too long).
In TvTropes, The Scrappy is not always exclusive to fictional characters. The Scrappy refers to a character, a being, that most of the base dislikes if not downright despise.
Nearly all entries in TVT are, of course, about fictional works, which is why when there's a Scrappy entry added to the YMMV page, it's about fictional characters.
But, TVT also has pages for non-fictional stuff. Such as a KYM page. The rules still apply, only with some changes: The base, becomes KYM's userbase. The Scrappy, is a character most dislike or hate, and in this case, Character=User.
Whether Wyny was real or fictional is completely irrelevant, because in that particular case, they're not talking about a fictional work with fictional characters. KYM is a real website with a real userbase, the userbase mostly dislikes Epyc, with some exceptions, which is why the Scrappy trope effectively applies to him.
We could also optionally use the logic that the one being tagged as the Scrappy is Epyc Win, the KYM user/persona, and not the Real Life person behind said user/persona, thus the trope could still apply even if the "no real life people" rule (that honestly, I've never heard being mentioned or enforced in TVT, ever. Where did you get that idea?) was enforced.
The Scrappy page has a "No Real Life Examples, Please!" notice; thus, real people cannot be added as Scrappies. Simple as that.
You know what I haven’t gotten?
AN APOLOGY. From literally any moderator on behalf of the mods or at the least on behalf of MScratch for this immensely wrong action built on the basis of many previous wrong actions which have caused me both hours ago and many times before very real depression. Instead I have only received insults and been the butt-end of rude jokes from a great deal of moderators in addition to the userbase which is heavily influenced by the actions of the moderators.
Instead I have only received insults and been the butt-end of rude jokes from a great deal of moderators in addition to the userbase which is heavily influenced by the actions of the moderators.
Instead I have only received insults
I have only received insults
only
(note: I was assured it was okay to show this pm, as it has no private details and was sent by me.)
Y'know what, after trying to give you as many chances as I reasonably could, offering to help you, giving you advice, and trying to be nice – I'm sure I've slipped up in some places, but I believe they are the exception rather than the rule – I'm done with you.
Snickerway wrote:
The Scrappy page has a "No Real Life Examples, Please!" notice; thus, real people cannot be added as Scrappies. Simple as that.
No no no. That notice means that you cannot add real life examples to it's page. Read: Examples. The ones mentioned on it's page or subpages.
They can be added where it's more necesary because it's mostly Real Life, for example the Professional Wrestling subpage.
They can also be added when they're technically not talking about a Real Life example. Like I said, in KYM's page's case, Character=User. When calling someone a Scrappy, they're not calling a Real Life person a Scrappy, but the persona that they use Online.
Basically, to give an hypothetical example ,it's like if in Real Life, people feel fine about you, but most players hate your WoW character for whatever reasons. You would be a Scrappy…or more precisely, your WoW character would be a Scrappy, but not the person behind the character.
Get what I'm saying? The Scrappy is the online mask, not the person hiding with it.
You know what? Here's an idea. How about you apologize? Apologize for being a general dick and pain in the ass for everyone who deals with you. Apologize for being a constant drain on this site and these forums. Apologize to the mods for your constant insults despite the fact that we continue to give you chances for your stupid actions. And most important, apologize to your parents for surviving that postpartum abortion I'm sure they attempted.
If you do all of that, then I'll personally apologize to you. How's that?
Still waiting for Epyc's apology.
Though I have stated this before and it eludes your memories, I will state this again. I am sincerely sorry for any pain I have caused.
Emperor Palpitoad wrote:
Though I have stated this before and it eludes your memories, I will state this again. I am sincerely sorry for any pain I have caused.
No you're not. As long as you don't get permanently banned, you don't care.
Emperor Palpitoad wrote:
Though I have stated this before and it eludes your memories, I will state this again. I am sincerely sorry for any pain I have caused.
It's easy to throw a blanket apology over things. Watch, I'll do it right now.
"I'm sorry you're Epyc Wyn."
See? Not very hard. Come back with a more sincere apology that impresses me.
HolyCrapItsBob wrote:
It's easy to throw a blanket apology over things. Watch, I'll do it right now.
"I'm sorry you're Epyc Wyn."
See? Not very hard. Come back with a more sincere apology that impresses me.
Nothing impresses you and you have conveyed you do not seek an apology. I have apologized for any pain I have caused. You apologized because I am me, which is actually insulting me. Your elitist attitude and self-centered cynicism in the face of a legitimate apology is abhorrent.
Emperor Palpitoad wrote:
Nothing impresses you and you have conveyed you do not seek an apology. I have apologized for any pain I have caused. You apologized because I am me, which is actually insulting me. Your elitist attitude and self-centered cynicism in the face of a legitimate apology is abhorrent.
A legitimate apology is not a copy/paste template you push out every time you can get something in return. That's a 5-year old child's apology.
Emperor Palpitoad wrote:
Though I have stated this before and it eludes your memories, I will state this again. I am sincerely sorry for any pain I have caused.
You should work for PR at EA.
(Seriously though, sincere or not, it's so generic, it's no wonder it feels fake).
HolyCrapItsBob wrote:
A legitimate apology is not a copy/paste template you push out every time you can get something in return. That's a 5-year old child's apology.
Well. It was my legitimate apology. Live the rest of your life mourning the fact you did not have a 4-star academy award-winning apology see who cares. It is my apology and it is still better than any apology you or any moderator has or likely ever will give me for wrong-doings which have been committed against me. I will always be sorry for any pain I have caused you or any other moderator but I'm not going to suck your dick if that's what you are telling me to do.
Emperor Palpitoad wrote:
Well. It was my legitimate apology. Live the rest of your life mourning the fact you did not have a 4-star academy award-winning apology see who cares. It is my apology and it is still better than any apology you or any moderator has or likely ever will give me for wrong-doings which have been committed against me. I will always be sorry for any pain I have caused you or any other moderator but I'm not going to suck your dick if that's what you are telling me to do.
>Actually owning up to the shit you do is sucking dick
Emperor Palpitoad wrote:
I'm going to my Biology class now. In three hours y'all sons of bitches are dead.
No. Fuck this. Fuck this shit. I We can't kill him.
So I'll go kill myself.
ITT: Epyc gets real butt rekt.
ITT:
Requesting lock
Emperor Palpitoad wrote:
Last I checked there was a rule against pasting private messages into forums and when a pm is then made public, would you consider that a polite thing to do? I'm sure you will give a yes followed by a reason I disagree with so here's a better question. Why are you pulling up stuff way in the past from IRC, which I am banned from and nobody can look at the logs of to prove for or against your case? You're just fueling a hateful circlejerk for free karma and an innate desire for you to harm me.
But even then, you have also told me to deactivate and that I deserve every punishment -even ones you have no knowledge of. You and your upvoters likely lacking a proper knowledge of what it means to be polite. Even though I disagree immensely with you and a great many others on this site whom have attacked my character, I have not nor will I ever stoop to the level of telling people they should leave, that everyone hates them, that they're an asshole, or otherwise purposefully try to hurt them. Otherwise I'd be acting in a barbarous harmful manner that can make people depressed in real life. I try very hard to improve people not destroy them like you have been wanting to do to me.
Edit:
@RandomMan that's a legitimate point. The plan is do 60 edits where I add in a couple sections, add some references, and reformat the code of some images and videos to proper site format. Then, I'll go back through them and add lots of references and redo the wording and add information to the paragraphs. And yeah, I'm doing it for a site title that has no value beyond what I give to it. And you know something else? I'm doing it just to prove I can.
Last I checked there was a rule against pasting private messages into forums and when a pm is then made public, would you consider that a polite thing to do?
It's Riff raff, you should be used to rule breaking now – especially since you do it often in any case. Also suck my feminine penis, I communicated with you and you bitched out like most kiddos. :^)
Why are you pulling up stuff way in the past from IRC
It's relevant and it's something you oh so love to do.
You’re just fueling a hateful circlejerk for free karma
kramas are very very important to me, I need my daily dose of +++karams to keep my liver functioning and my baby maker baby free.
and an innate desire for you to harm me.
If words from someone you don't know living halfway across the world harm you then you're an even bigger little bitch than I thought.
But even then, you have also told me to deactivate and that I deserve every punishment
Man I said that? Damn I'm so right, I agree with past me. You should and do.
You and your upvoters likely lacking a proper knowledge of what it means to be polite
You're asking people to be polite on the internet. l o l – and even more so you're asking for people to be polite to you when you refuse in turn to do so to others. My faggot alert is blaring and your names right next to it.
I have not nor will I ever stoop to the level of telling people they should leave, that everyone hates them, that they’re an asshole,
1) I do
2) You should leave
3) Majority of the site, including me, doesn't per se "hate" you, more so hold disdain for.
4) Yes, you are an asshole.
Otherwise I’d be acting in a barbarous harmful manner
I'm from Africa, itsh whatsh we do mein nigger
I try very hard to improve people not destroy them like you have been wanting to do to me.
"destroy" lol don't be so melodramatic – I just want you to shut the fuck up on the forums and be a normal human being – not the minge you currently ar. viper kys my man xddd
tl;dr I break down epycs faggot post and call him a faggot
Z. wrote:
ITT:
You're alright Triple Zed. I think I'm starting to really like you.
Some of You Guys are Alright, Don’t go to Riff-Raff Tomorrow
Already a memeber? | Don't have an account? |