Lisa Lombardo General
Last posted
Aug 19, 2015 at 10:53PM EDT.
Added
Feb 26, 2015 at 06:05PM EST
182 posts
from
60 users
credit goes to triplez
Derpy Vaz wrote:
make this my obituary
I PM'd Lisa to not troll in my entry comments
Look I’m 44 and married so your feminist trolling doesn’t fly with me. The entry has nothing to do with feminism or GG so please take it elsewhere and don’t continue.
The thundercunts response:
You’re not a mod, site comments are my playground. Peace.
So since admitting to being a troll and and that comment section being it's playground, All bets are off boys. Go ahead and troll as you see fit.
lisalombs
Banned
bruh.
bruh.
This is the greatest thing I've ever seen.
Usual Riff-Raff convention is no locking, but I'd like to remind the other mods that we now have been told explicitly that our powers can (and should) be used to prevent threads like these regardless of the board. Furthermore, this thread keeps getting quasi-necro'd a few days before its auto-lock. Christ.
Bob and I have decided that this warrants a lock. If you disagree, feel free to deliver your arguments to either of us.
Particle Mare wrote:
Usual Riff-Raff convention is no locking, but I'd like to remind the other mods that we now have been told explicitly that our powers can (and should) be used to prevent threads like these regardless of the board. Furthermore, this thread keeps getting quasi-necro'd a few days before its auto-lock. Christ.
Bob and I have decided that this warrants a lock. If you disagree, feel free to deliver your arguments to either of us.
#serious-riffraffer-rorio
Well, for starters the quasi-necros aren't an argument because this is Riff-Raff. If that was one of your reasons for locking this, it's not a good one.
Second, if the exact person this thread is about makes a recent post reading.
This is the greatest thing I’ve ever seen.
Then I don't think she herself receives this thread as a bullying thread. Riff-Raff allows making fun of, but doesn't allow cyberbullying. And tbh, I don't think this really is much of a bullying or public shaming thread considering the first page of the thread and her own posts as well thus far.
So I'm gonna play the safe card: If Lisa herself sends any of us a PM stating that she herself finds this thread either a bullying or public shaming thread, I'm fine with it being locked. But if she's fine with how the thread has been going thus far, then we have no reason to lock it because it's not insulting anyone. If she doesn't send a PM, I'm gonna assume it's the latter by default.
If Particle Mare, Bob, or anyone reading this post, has anything to add to it, just PM any of us instead of continuing in this thread. But yeah I'm unlocking this thread again.
Holy shit, Particle Mare is a forum mod. I thought she was only showing off.
Loli wrote:
Holy shit, Particle Mare is a forum mod. I thought she was only showing off.
Particle Mare
more like
Poop Mare
ayyyyyyyyyyyyyyy
The living proof that whining for mod powers will get you somewhere.
lisalombs
Banned
God bless, I was so sad the 44 year old gamer gator got my thread locked T_T Poor things are so sensitive.
lisalombs
Banned
He's the one who keeps bringing it up out of nowhere, I didn't mention GG at all. He's just mad cause he was forced to confront his legitimate sexism, so of course I'm a SJW on an anti GG crusade.
lisalombs wrote:
He's the one who keeps bringing it up out of nowhere, I didn't mention GG at all. He's just mad cause he was forced to confront his legitimate sexism, so of course I'm a SJW on an anti GG crusade.
I've never had any problems with DerpyVaz being sexist (By this I mean, he's never been sexist as far as I've seen), and I've been around him a decent while longer than you. I think you and him are just having a lil' scrim and should chill out bruh B^) it's a meme site.
No girls or video games allowed on my memesite shitpost forum.
(P.S. Derpyvaz is a trollposter, good job falling for it)
lisalombs
Banned
lmao I'm not the one with the issue, all I did was comment on the McDonald's girl entry he made and he apparently got offended enough to post in here. I said it was the greatest thing I've ever seen because never have such mild comments from me garnered the kind of butthurt it takes to call upon RR as your personal troll army
RandomMan wrote:
No girls or video games allowed on my memesite shitpost forum.
(P.S. Derpyvaz is a trollposter, good job falling for it)
fite me irl RM. I'm going to be posting lewds all I want and you and your army of nerdy boys can't stop me. I will spread cooties all over KYM.
lisalombs wrote:
lmao I'm not the one with the issue, all I did was comment on the McDonald's girl entry he made and he apparently got offended enough to post in here. I said it was the greatest thing I've ever seen because never have such mild comments from me garnered the kind of butthurt it takes to call upon RR as your personal troll army
I just found this a funny post, can't even be arsed to read the rest of that comment chain:
Lutien
ModeratorDeactivated
daily reminder
Loli wrote:
The living proof that whining for mod powers will get you somewhere.
gib database powahs pls
@RM
The instructions (if I recall correctly) were plainly and simply "lock threads directed at a specific user". There was no real vagueness to suggest that exceptions could be made based on what the user in question thinks of the thread.
This was said in the IRC quite a while ago, though, so I may be recalling it incorrectly. If anyone has logs, they would be appreciated.
Well, in that case I do suggest we get something more specific written down in the mod forum.
The rule “lock threads directed at a specific user” is so broad and unspecific that we got A LOT of old threads that should've never been fine to begin with. For example: all your shipping threads, Mare. Dig through Memeory Lane and you can find more examples.
I refuse to believe such a non-specific rule can work.
Particle Mare wrote:
gib database powahs pls
@RM
The instructions (if I recall correctly) were plainly and simply "lock threads directed at a specific user". There was no real vagueness to suggest that exceptions could be made based on what the user in question thinks of the thread.
This was said in the IRC quite a while ago, though, so I may be recalling it incorrectly. If anyone has logs, they would be appreciated.
Riff Raff was created so that threads like these could exist, that's why Blubber pushed getting it.
Riff Raff Rule 6. Be Friendpfffhaha sorry, let me try again. Ahem, Be Frhahaha. No, that rule is not enforced here. Don’t go cyberbullying or publicly harassing, but if you have beef this is the place to vent. We promise not to laugh at you ;).
If its harassment, explain why and then it might be locked.
Spider-Byte wrote:
Riff Raff was created so that threads like these could exist, that's why Blubber pushed getting it.
Riff Raff Rule 6. Be Friendpfffhaha sorry, let me try again. Ahem, Be Frhahaha. No, that rule is not enforced here. Don’t go cyberbullying or publicly harassing, but if you have beef this is the place to vent. We promise not to laugh at you ;).
If its harassment, explain why and then it might be locked.
I suppose it was a mistake on my part to post here, since only a few people actually know the context behind what I said.
I wasn't appealing to the Riff Raff rules. I was referring to a very recent (within the last month) discussion with Don where he specifically informed a handful of present mods that Riff-Raff rules as they stood were too lenient. Needless to say, Blubber disapproved when he later found out.
@RM
we got A LOT of old threads that should’ve never been fine to begin with
Yeah, exactly. A lot of the old Mareposting threads were locked once it was decided that the circlejerking had crossed the line, as you should remember. It's just that a certain thread was the tipping point that finally got the admins on our case.
But enough from me; you have a point when you say that this belongs in the mod forum. Over and out.
FizzBuzz3000
Deactivated
Lutien wrote:
daily reminder
like anyone is gonna listen to that
:^)
lisalombs wrote:
lmao I'm not the one with the issue, all I did was comment on the McDonald's girl entry he made and he apparently got offended enough to post in here. I said it was the greatest thing I've ever seen because never have such mild comments from me garnered the kind of butthurt it takes to call upon RR as your personal troll army
All you did was bring your feminist trolling to an entry that has nothing to do with your bullshit rantings. You are as much of a troll as any GamerGater. I asked you nice in a PM to not do it. You replied "The comment section is my playground" in other words admitting to being a troll and continued. So you can troll all you want and so can I.
Cus Im an obvious perv….
DCS WORLD
Deactivated
So, not only is she insane with political topics she is also irrational with general life. Is she ill or something? Honestly this is a legit question.
Meanwhile, in Riff-Raff…
I hope it's not too late to post this.
lisalombs
Banned
Uhhh now he's posting sexist image macros in response to my other site comments….
It's really very apparent that he is both not sexist and incredibly not mad, right~
lisalombs
Banned
sigghhhh.