Forums / Media / Video Games

39,014 total conversations in 2,737 threads

+ New Thread


PlayStation Plus becoming a three-tiered service, with the highest offering access to emulated PS1, PS2, and PSP games

Last posted Apr 06, 2022 at 12:33PM EDT. Added Mar 30, 2022 at 12:51PM EDT
5 posts from 4 users

Source

This was rumored for a good while under the name "Project Spartacus," and now it's been made official. The easiest way to describe it is it sounds like Sony is taking an approach that mimics both Xbox Game Pass and Nintendo Switch Online. The lowest tier for PS Plus will be PS Plus as it's always been, the regular "pay $60 a year to play online and get exclusive discounts" subscription. The middle tier will be $100 a year and will combine PS Plus and PS Now into one, basically dropping the PS Now name in favor of just making it a tier for PS Plus (PS Now is a service where you can stream or natively download select PS4 and 5 games at no additional cost). And finally the highest tier, the one most akin to Nintendo Switch Online, is you'll get everything from the other tiers, but will also be able to download emulated versions of games from the PS1, 2, and PSP. PS3 is sadly still only playable via cloud streaming, which of course has gotten negative reactions, alongside the fact the price of this tier is $120 a year, double what a basic PS Plus subscription costs (I mean hey Nintendo got flak for the Expansion Pack tier of NSO being $50, of course Sony will catch similar flak for tier-3 PS Plus subscriptions being $120).

Sony's plan is to "roll out" the service by region over the course of 2022, starting with Asian territories in June and I guess places like the Americas and Europe by late summer or early fall.

Now my personal opinion: I can't deny that the inclusion of PS1, 2, and PSP titles in the highest tier has me super intrigued, but I really need to see what Sony plans to add before I even think about paying an extra $60 a year for PS Plus. It obviously needs first party titles like Ratchet and Clank, Sly Cooper, Ico, Ape Escape, and the like, but also third party stuff like most of Square's PS1 output, Tomb Raider, Crash and Spyro need to be there after they were mysteriously not on the infamous PS1 Classic, and if you're not gonna remake Medieval 2 just put the original on the service.

Yeah, I'm gonna have to take a hard pass.

Switch Online at least has the justification of physical copies of those games and systems being ludicrously expensive because of scalpers. I see no reason to pay all that money for unreliable cloud versions of games when I can just go to a used games store and buy the physical, internet-free original versions of those games for $20 or less and play them on my actual PS2.

Since most of the games can only be played through cloud streaming, I'm gonna hard pass on this as well.
I'm still disappointed by the fact that they didn't make the PS4/PS5 fully backward compatible with PS1, PS2, and PS3 discs in the first place.

Yangy wrote:

Since most of the games can only be played through cloud streaming, I'm gonna hard pass on this as well.
I'm still disappointed by the fact that they didn't make the PS4/PS5 fully backward compatible with PS1, PS2, and PS3 discs in the first place.

Apparently Mark Cerny discussed this leading to the PS4's release and admitted it was gonna make the PS4 cost too much to put the necessary hardware in the console. Now why they didn't later work something into the PS5, well hell if I know. Sony making that damn CELL Processor for the PS3 proved to be a huge mistake in the long run, not only did it hurt the console's third party support in its first couple of years, but its made backwards compatibility with the system's games harder than it needs to be.

Skeletor-sm

This thread is closed to new posts.

Old threads normally auto-close after 30 days of inactivity.

Why don't you start a new thread instead?

Howdy! You must login or signup first!