Yu-Gi-Oh! - Images

Sorted By:

Ghost girl

emma bessho yugioh yugioh vrains ghost girl.

Christmas Yuzu

yugioh arc-v yuzu christmas

Blue Maiden Aoi

yugioh yugioh vrains aoi zaizen blue maiden

Ghost girl

mam 8 07.0

mam 8 07.0

yugioh yugioh vrains emma bessho ghost girl

Summon Sorceress

summon sorceress yugioh yugioh vrains link

Holly Angel

yugioh yugioh vrains trickstar holly angel

Shonen Jump Ore Collection - 5 star Yu-Gi-Oh! cards

むとうゆうき武藤遊戯むとうゆうぎ武藤"遊戯遊戯 RECOLLECTION 刊 ,つやじょうのう城之内克也かいばせ海馬瀬人

むとうゆうき武藤遊戯むとうゆうぎ武藤"遊戯遊戯 RECOLLECTION 刊 ,つやじょうのう城之内克也かいばせ海馬瀬人

shonen jump shonen jump ore collection yu-gi-oh! 1990s

Shonen Jump Ore Collection - 4 star Yu-Gi-Oh! cards

武藤遊戯遊瓞城之内克也海馬瀬人

武藤遊戯遊瓞城之内克也海馬瀬人

shonen jump shonen jump ore collection yu-gi-oh! 1990s

Firewall Dragon has been banned in the TCG

found in an /a/ thread, original source unknown

"For the first time in the history of the Yu-Gi-Oh TCG, the ace card of the anime's protagonist has been placed on the Forbidden list.":https://ygorganization.com/firewalldown/

found in an /a/ thread, original source unknown

"For the first time in the history of the Yu-Gi-Oh TCG, the ace card of the anime's protagonist has been placed on the Forbidden list.":https://ygorganization.com/firewalldown/

yugioh vrains yusaku fujiki playmaker ai firewall dragon salute farewell press f to pay respects

Condemned Best Girl

yugioh forbidden series condemned maiden solemn scolding darklord

Dark Magician Girl struggles with Yu-Gi-Oh! Chapter 4

More ruling shenanigans, and some more context. Also can someone please make you're goddamned wight it's own image? I don't have a working computer right now.

This chapter makes more sense in the OCG since our current Skill Drain card text explicitly mentions "... while those monsters are face-up on the field". The OCG Skill Drain doesn't have that extra line, so it reads pretty much the same as Imperial Order, only differing in what cards' effects they negate. Depending on how far back you go in erratas, we here in the TCG probably had the same confusion too.

We know from the last chapter how cards like Skill Drain and Fiendish Chain can't negate monster effects if those monsters aren't on the field when their effects resolve. Imperial Order, on the other hand, does negate Spell effects activated on the field regardless of where the Spell is when it resolves. It doesn't care about the physical card, only the effect. This comes back to the whole 'effects resolve where they were activated' game mechanic. Since Wonder Wand was activated on the field, the effect resolves on the field, which Imperial Order negates.

That "the card is different" reply in panel 4 is an apocryphal Konameme in the OCG where it's said that when asked about why Mind Master couldn't tribute itself (which pre-errata did not say that it couldn't) while Substitoad could, they supposedly answered "the cards are different". Then, when asked what they meant by "the cards are different", they supposedly answered, "We mean that the cards are different."

More ruling shenanigans, and some more context. Also can someone please make you're goddamned wight it's own image? I don't have a working computer right now.

This chapter makes more sense in the OCG since our current Skill Drain card text explicitly mentions "... while those monsters are face-up on the field". The OCG Skill Drain doesn't have that extra line, so it reads pretty much the same as Imperial Order, only differing in what cards' effects they negate. Depending on how far back you go in erratas, we here in the TCG probably had the same confusion too.

We know from the last chapter how cards like Skill Drain and Fiendish Chain can't negate monster effects if those monsters aren't on the field when their effects resolve. Imperial Order, on the other hand, does negate Spell effects activated on the field regardless of where the Spell is when it resolves. It doesn't care about the physical card, only the effect. This comes back to the whole 'effects resolve where they were activated' game mechanic. Since Wonder Wand was activated on the field, the effect resolves on the field, which Imperial Order negates.

That "the card is different" reply in panel 4 is an apocryphal Konameme in the OCG where it's said that when asked about why Mind Master couldn't tribute itself (which pre-errata did not say that it couldn't) while Substitoad could, they supposedly answered "the cards are different". Then, when asked what they meant by "the cards are different", they supposedly answered, "We mean that the cards are different."

dark magician girl effect veiler skull servant arm of exodia cardcar d emergency provisions imperial order skill drain wonder wand

Dark Magician Girl struggles with Yu-Gi-Oh! Chapter 3

Here's some context that will probably confuse people who don't play the game.

Effect negations (not to be confused with negating activations), as it turns out, can also be a bit involved despite seeming like an innocuous subject. It says something about the matter when people have to refer to stuff like Majestic Star Dragon to discuss this.

It's a little complicated. To start off with something simple, you know how it's illegal to activate Dark Hole when there are no monsters on the field? Likewise, cards like Effect Veiler that only negate can't be used on a monster that has its effects already negated because it won't do anything. This is also the case with cards that require them to negate effects before doing other things like Sky Striker Mecha - Widow Anchor, Ice Beast Zerofyne, and Majestic Star Dragon.

For these types of negation effects that can't legally be activated, their negation effects are not applied (even after being activated) if an effect higher in the chain negates first. The example in the comic is Effect Veiler not being able to apply its negation effect later in the chain after Fiendish Chain negates first. And as the comic aludes to, it doesn't matter if the type of negation is different.

Then there are the negation cards that are legal to activate against monsters that already have their effects negated. Those are cards like Forbidden Chalice, Black Illusion, and Divine Dragon Knight Felgrand. These seem to be the cards that include negation as part of an assortment of other effects without requiring it. These effects do apply on top of existing negation effects. Using Forbidden Chalice on Lonefire Blossom when Skill Drain is already face-up on the field will negate Lonefire Blossom if it tributes itself, for example.

Here's some context that will probably confuse people who don't play the game.

Effect negations (not to be confused with negating activations), as it turns out, can also be a bit involved despite seeming like an innocuous subject. It says something about the matter when people have to refer to stuff like Majestic Star Dragon to discuss this.

It's a little complicated. To start off with something simple, you know how it's illegal to activate Dark Hole when there are no monsters on the field? Likewise, cards like Effect Veiler that only negate can't be used on a monster that has its effects already negated because it won't do anything. This is also the case with cards that require them to negate effects before doing other things like Sky Striker Mecha - Widow Anchor, Ice Beast Zerofyne, and Majestic Star Dragon.

For these types of negation effects that can't legally be activated, their negation effects are not applied (even after being activated) if an effect higher in the chain negates first. The example in the comic is Effect Veiler not being able to apply its negation effect later in the chain after Fiendish Chain negates first. And as the comic aludes to, it doesn't matter if the type of negation is different.

Then there are the negation cards that are legal to activate against monsters that already have their effects negated. Those are cards like Forbidden Chalice, Black Illusion, and Divine Dragon Knight Felgrand. These seem to be the cards that include negation as part of an assortment of other effects without requiring it. These effects do apply on top of existing negation effects. Using Forbidden Chalice on Lonefire Blossom when Skill Drain is already face-up on the field will negate Lonefire Blossom if it tributes itself, for example.

dark magician girl effect veiler fiendish chain lonefire blossom. lonefire blossom skull servant

Dark Magician Girl struggles with Yu-Gi-Oh! Chapter 2

Here's some context.

Condition" is the unofficial term the English wiki* uses for the what the OCG unofficially refers to as "Non-Effect Text". They can't be negated because they aren't effects. It can get a little confusing because there are Effect Monsters with only non-effect text (eg: Cyber Harpie Lady, Elemental HERO Mudballman). Which isn't to be confused with non-Effect Monsters like Gem-Knight Pearl or Magician of Black Chaos.

The cards in panel 3 are Embodiment of Apophis and Elemental HERO Neos Alius. The "This card is treated as a Normal Monster..." effect of Gemini monsters can be negated and they will be treated as Effect Monsters. Ha Des can refer to both Dark Ruler Ha Des or the synchro version.

That BLS in the last panel is a reference to the special prize card given to the winner of the first nationwide Yugioh tournament in Japan, held in 1999. Aside from the distinction of being a vanilla version of BLS, a Ritual Monster, it's illegal to play, probably less because it's the only one of its kind in the world, and more because it was printed on a card made of stainless steel. Imagine handing your deck to your opponent to cut with this card in it.

Here's some context.

Condition" is the unofficial term the English wiki* uses for the what the OCG unofficially refers to as "Non-Effect Text". They can't be negated because they aren't effects. It can get a little confusing because there are Effect Monsters with only non-effect text (eg: Cyber Harpie Lady, Elemental HERO Mudballman). Which isn't to be confused with non-Effect Monsters like Gem-Knight Pearl or Magician of Black Chaos.

The cards in panel 3 are Embodiment of Apophis and Elemental HERO Neos Alius. The "This card is treated as a Normal Monster..." effect of Gemini monsters can be negated and they will be treated as Effect Monsters. Ha Des can refer to both Dark Ruler Ha Des or the synchro version.

That BLS in the last panel is a reference to the special prize card given to the winner of the first nationwide Yugioh tournament in Japan, held in 1999. Aside from the distinction of being a vanilla version of BLS, a Ritual Monster, it's illegal to play, probably less because it's the only one of its kind in the world, and more because it was printed on a card made of stainless steel. Imagine handing your deck to your opponent to cut with this card in it.

dark magician girl skull servant embodiment of apophis elemental hero neos alius. elemental hero neos alius cyber harpie lady elemental hero mudballman black luster soldier gale the whirlwind

Dark Magician Girl struggles with Yu-Gi-Oh! Chapter 1

Also known as when simple effects have long rulings.

Also known as when simple effects have long rulings.

dark magician girl gale the whirlwind

Dark Magician Girl struggles with Yu-Gi-Oh! Chapter 0

Yes you really cannot search Eye of Timaeus with Magician's Rod since it doesn't actually specifically state Dark Magician but rather cards that have Dark Magician in their name.

Yes you really cannot search Eye of Timaeus with Magician's Rod since it doesn't actually specifically state Dark Magician but rather cards that have Dark Magician in their name.

dark magician girl magician's rod eye of timaeus

Aki fanart

yu-gi-oh 5ds akiza aki bocodamondo