"it's not censorship if we scare off devs from releasing their game in america"
jeez, that sounds reassuring

I don't find this stance honest, not because of feminism at all, but because there's absolutely 0 to show the author means what they say when it comes to not wanting to take away games.

Here is an example of a game being denied to a country due to the current cultural climate, that is influenced by people working for media designed to talk about and in some way try to influence culture. Instead of turning an introspective gaze into the current approach to addressing the "problem" in gaming, IE people boycotting, doxxing, releasing highly negative opinion pieces, what you see is either celebrating the decision, angrily fuming about efforts to get the game to the US, or feigning indifference while saying "but I'm glad the game isn't coming out anyway".

You can't claim that you want more diverse games while not touching other peoples games, while being happy about a game being denied to people over politics. Just like you can't claim to be pro-dev and then try to get game content removed because it might be "pro-sjw".

That's what's frustrating about this whole thing, and what this article fails at doing. It just reiterates a hypocritical stance that "It's good this game got taken away, and by the way we aren't trying to take away peoples games", instead of either coming out and saying plainly how they want games they don't like taken away, or how the pro-active ways they've gone about tackling this issue are causing bad things to happen.