ITS ONLY CENSORSHIP IF THE GOVERNMENT DOES EXACTLY IS JUST CREATORS CHANGING THEIR WORKS, OR BUSINESS OWNERS BANNING GAMES THEY DON'T WANT TO SELL. CENSORSHIP, THE SUPPRESSION OF WORDS, IMAGES OR IDEAS THAT ARE "OFFENSIVE," HAPPENS WHENEVER SOME PEOPLE SUCCEED IN IMPOSING THEIR PERSONAL POLITICAL OR MORAL VALUES ON OTHERS. SINCE CENSORSHIP IS FORBIDDEN IN THE CONSTITUTION IN MANY FREE COUNTRIES, IN THE FORM OF A PHRASE THAT GOES ALONG THE LINES OF "THE GOVERNMENT CAN'T PASS A LAW THAT RESTRICT THE FREE EXPRESSION OF THOUGHT AND PRESS", MANY PEOPLE THINK THE TERM CENSORSHIP" REALLY ONLY APPLIES TO GOVERNMENT AND NOT TO PRIVATE ORGANIZATIONS OR INDIVIDUAL PEOPLE CENSORSHIP CAN BE CARRIED OUT BY THE GOVERNMENT AS WELL AS PRIVATE PRESSURE GROUPS. ITS JUST THAT CENSORSHIP BY THE GOVERNMENT IS WHEN A COMPANY A BUSINESS OWNER OR A CREATOR DECIDES TO CHANGE SOMETHING BECAUSE THEY WANT TO, IT'S Ok. WHEN A GROUP OF ACTIVISTS ARE THREATENING TO BOYCOTT AND DEMONIZE A CREATOR IF THEIR DEMANDS ARE NOT MET, THEY ARE USING SOCIAL PRESSURE IN AN ATTEMPT TO FORCE SAID CREATOR NOT TO CARRY PRODUCTS THEY WOULD OTHERWISE WANT TO CARRY, OR NOT TO CREATE THEM IN THE WAY THEY WOULD WANT TO. I THINK THIS JOKE HAS NO MEANING IN THIS IS VERY DIFFERENT THAN A BUSINESS OWNER OR AN ARTIST CHOOSING, OF ONE'S OWN FREE WILL AND ACCORD TO DO WHAT ONE WANTS IT FOR THAT VERSION OF YOU CAN'T MAKE THAT THE BIG DIFFERENCE WITH GOVERNMENT IS THAT IT ALLEGEDLY HAS A LEGITIMATE POWER TO USE FORCE. THE ACTLAL ATTEMPT TO USE POWER AND MANIPULATION TO BAN GAMES IS IN EVERY RESPECT, CENSORSHIP. You DoN'T NEED TO BE THE GOVERNMENT TO ENGAGE IN CENSORSHIP. ALL YOU NEED IS TO USE COERCION MANIPULATION OR FORCE TO TAKE AWAY ANY OPPORTUNITY FOR OTHER PEOPLE TO GET TO READ OR SEE OR PURCHASE OR PLAY SOMETHING THEY MIGHT OTHERWISE WANT TO. BUT CENSORSHIP IS CENSORSHIP NO MATTER WHO DOES IT HTTP://KukuRu

Share Pin Download More

vivian james female fictional character gamergate quinnspiracy tfyc the fine young capitalists liliam woods censorship speech video games 4chan 8chan /v/ comic webcomic web comic kukuruyo kukuruyoart gamergate life

Origin Entry: Vivian James

Notes:

deviantART – KukuruyoArt – Source

File type: jpg

Resolution: (868px x 1228px)

File size: 909 KB

SHUCK FUSSSH SHUCK THUNK! FUSSSH CREFEAK IS THIS ABOUT ETHICS IN GAMES JOURNALISM? MOST OF THOSE GAMING WEBSITES WENT BANKRUPT. THIS IS WORSE. ASHION Pats 24 AH, S---. HERE WE GO AGAIN. GIO GAMERGATE 2014 201 冊 10 A

View All 788 Images

Load 9 Comments

More:

+38

Vivian James - Is Censorship Even If Is Not The Government by Kukuruyo

PROTIP: Press the ← and → keys to navigate the gallery, 'g' to view the gallery, or 'r' to view a random image.

ITS ONLY CENSORSHIP IF THE GOVERNMENT DOES EXACTLY IS JUST CREATORS CHANGING THEIR WORKS, OR BUSINESS OWNERS BANNING GAMES THEY DON'T WANT TO SELL. CENSORSHIP, THE SUPPRESSION OF WORDS, IMAGES OR IDEAS THAT ARE "OFFENSIVE," HAPPENS WHENEVER SOME PEOPLE SUCCEED IN IMPOSING THEIR PERSONAL POLITICAL OR MORAL VALUES ON OTHERS. SINCE CENSORSHIP IS FORBIDDEN IN THE CONSTITUTION IN MANY FREE COUNTRIES, IN THE FORM OF A PHRASE THAT GOES ALONG THE LINES OF "THE GOVERNMENT CAN'T PASS A LAW THAT RESTRICT THE FREE EXPRESSION OF THOUGHT AND PRESS", MANY PEOPLE THINK THE TERM CENSORSHIP" REALLY ONLY APPLIES TO GOVERNMENT AND NOT TO PRIVATE ORGANIZATIONS OR INDIVIDUAL PEOPLE CENSORSHIP CAN BE CARRIED OUT BY THE GOVERNMENT AS WELL AS PRIVATE PRESSURE GROUPS. ITS JUST THAT CENSORSHIP BY THE GOVERNMENT IS WHEN A COMPANY A BUSINESS OWNER OR A CREATOR DECIDES TO CHANGE SOMETHING BECAUSE THEY WANT TO, IT'S Ok. WHEN A GROUP OF ACTIVISTS ARE THREATENING TO BOYCOTT AND DEMONIZE A CREATOR IF THEIR DEMANDS ARE NOT MET, THEY ARE USING SOCIAL PRESSURE IN AN ATTEMPT TO FORCE SAID CREATOR NOT TO CARRY PRODUCTS THEY WOULD OTHERWISE WANT TO CARRY, OR NOT TO CREATE THEM IN THE WAY THEY WOULD WANT TO. I THINK THIS JOKE HAS NO MEANING IN THIS IS VERY DIFFERENT THAN A BUSINESS OWNER OR AN ARTIST CHOOSING, OF ONE'S OWN FREE WILL AND ACCORD TO DO WHAT ONE WANTS IT FOR THAT VERSION OF YOU CAN'T MAKE THAT THE BIG DIFFERENCE WITH GOVERNMENT IS THAT IT ALLEGEDLY HAS A LEGITIMATE POWER TO USE FORCE. THE ACTLAL ATTEMPT TO USE POWER AND MANIPULATION TO BAN GAMES IS IN EVERY RESPECT, CENSORSHIP. You DoN'T NEED TO BE THE GOVERNMENT TO ENGAGE IN CENSORSHIP. ALL YOU NEED IS TO USE COERCION MANIPULATION OR FORCE TO TAKE AWAY ANY OPPORTUNITY FOR OTHER PEOPLE TO GET TO READ OR SEE OR PURCHASE OR PLAY SOMETHING THEY MIGHT OTHERWISE WANT TO. BUT CENSORSHIP IS CENSORSHIP NO MATTER WHO DOES IT HTTP://KukuRu

View Gallery Random Image

Top Comments

ObadiahtheSlim

ObadiahtheSlim

Mar 08, 2016 at 12:12PM EST

Remember, in Fahrenheit 451, it was the public and not the government who started the campaign against books.

+24

Alien Controller

Alien Controller

Mar 08, 2016 at 04:12AM EST

+19

+ Add a Comment

Comments (9)

Display Comments

Image Details

3,872 views (12 from today)

Uploaded Mar 07, 2016 at 07:22AM EST

Origin Entry

Notes

deviantART – KukuruyoArt – Source

click to expand

Claim Authorship Edit History

About the Uploader

Gabenus Trollucus

Deactivated

Textile Embed

!https://i.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/newsfeed/001/089/110/c60.jpg!

Today's Top Image Galleries

Queen Never Cry meme.

Queen Never Cry

Wifejak meme format depicting a female wojak character with red hair and a grey shirt.

Wifejak

The Social Contract

The Social Contract

A photo of Furries at a furry convention.

Furries / Furry