-
People Can't Get Over How Lex Luthor Looks Both Like Agent 47 And Den Hentchel In The 'Superman' Trailer -
Fortnite Introduces Skibidi Toilet Collab: Players React To The Latest Crossover Craze -
Mikey Madison Sparks Viral Debate After Alleging She Refused Intimacy Coordinator While Filming ‘Anora' -
The Trial Of Luigi Mangione Is Heating Up Following A New York City Perp Walk That Only Made Him Look Cooler -
Brock Lesnar Has Been Screaming His Love His Favorite Countries And Things Since 2022
!["Findings showed that the extent to which a woman was relationally attached (i.e. felt close to the other members of her group) was sufficient to explain the group's importance to her. In contrast, men's ratings of group importance depended upon the extent of both relational and collective attachment (i.e. attached to the group identity)." For women, group importance is mainly determined by the degree to which the group fulfills relational needs [personal friendships], while men place a greater importance on the collective identity that groups offer." "only men were willing to sacrifice for their group "men place a greater importance on group memberships and large collectives." "women prefer talking about relationships, while men prefer discussing less personal topics such as politics'" "women appeared to be only relationally focused, showing very low levels of collective attachment, whereas men were both relationally and collectively focused" "Whereas women's unprompted definition of 'commitment' focused on being 'people-concerned and 'available', more males (and top managers) defined commitment as being task-oriented proactive, innovative, adding value, and being ready for challenge. This evidence is suggestive of sex differences in relational and collective attachments to organizations, and may at least lead to perceptions of women's lesser commitment to companies." "Women were significantly more likely to trust an outgroup member who shared a potential crossgroup relationship connection .] In fact, for women, there was no significant difference in trust toward the ingroup member and the potential relationship target. [.] Men trusted ingroup members significantly more than outgroup members regardless of cross-group relationship connections." Loyalty, patriotism, heritage? What are these strange meaningless words? Gratitude for the society men built? Lol, l'd rather eat broken glass Sacrifice to help the group, tribe, nation? Hahahaha, in your dreams. Long-term consequences? But think about the kids! They're crying!! Importing millions of foreigners? Spreading my legs for invaders? Yes, Yes、YESSS!! Gender Differences in the Relational and Collective Bases for Trust (Maddux, Brewer) Circle of Friends or Members of a Group? Sex Differences in Relational and Collective Attachment to Groups (Seeley, Gardner, Pennington, Gabriel)](https://i.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/original/001/162/270/68b.jpg "It's hard to swallow if you can't into logic")
-2
It's hard to swallow if you can't into logic
Uploaded by discord666 Aug 22, 2016 at 10:13AM EDT
woman women feminism feminist truth fact redpill red pill /r9k/ r9k woman hate thread politics
Origin Entry: /r9k/
File type: jpg
Resolution: (900px x 1493px)
File size: 426 KB
![A meta-analysis1 of 57 studies? of sex differences in general population samples showed that males obtain higher means from the age of 15 through to old age. Among adults, the male advantage is 5 IQ points. The scientists wrote: "[From] 15 years onwards [.] males consistently obtain higher means than females and all of these differences are statistically significant" and "The advantage of boys begins to appear at the age of 14 and increases in size among adults. A graphical representation of the meta-analysis: Adult lQ Distribution in the Raven Progressive Matrices Female Male 2x more mentally retarded females than males 2x more males than females at IQ 130 approx. 15x more males than females a 145+ -4 .3 -2 -1 2 40 55 70 85 100 115 130 145 160 36 52 68 84 100 116 132 148 164 0.003 0.135 2.275 15.866 50.000 84.134 97.725 99.865 99.997 STANDARD DEVIATIONS WECHSLER I STANFORD-BINET I CUMULATIVE PERCENTAGE A meta-analysis of 15 studiest of child samples on the Colored Progressive Matrices showed that among children aged 5-11 years boys have an advantage of 3.2 IQ points. Paul Cooijmans5 writes "In the high range, my own observation to date is that at or above the 98th percentile [Top 2%, IQ 130-1 there are about twice more males than females, while at or above the 99.9th percentile [Top 0.1%, IQ 145+] there are about 15 times more males." A survey' of 1142 women found that 37% were willing to swap their IQ in order to be their ideal dress size. And 41% would rather have bigger breasts than a high IQ "Sex differences on the progressive matrices: A meta-analysis" by Richard Lynn and Paul Irwing, University of Ulster University of Manchester 257 studies, 31 countries, 195 tests,80928 participants. 15 studies, 11 countries, 42 tests, 60168 participants Founder of six I.Q, societies,administrator of "The Glia Society" and "The Giga Society",constructor of high-range mental tests creator of the world's hardest I.Q, test MyVoucherCodes (UK) survey, 1142 women aged 18-25, conducted during National Eating Disorder Week B-But all my female primaryschool teachers told me that women' are as intelligent as men. Now l am confused. Does that mean lcan't become the most cutest brain'surgeon anymore?](https://i.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/newsfeed/001/162/266/a5b.jpg "we are all equal")
![4channer Suicide Anonymous Thu 15 Mar 2018 11:50:08 No.43858201 View Reply Original Report Quoted By: >43858431 > 43858459 >>43858469 >43858520 >43858522 >>43858608 >43858623 >43858663 >43858673 >>43858723 >>43858725 >>43858729 >>43858730>>43858832 >>43858915 >>43858917 >>43858925 >>43858953 >>43858980 >>43858986 >>43859001 >>43859086 >>43859098 >>43859133 >>43859187 >>43859215 >>43859295 >>43859347 >>43859379 >>43859496 >>43859711 >>43859778 >>43859821 >>43859875 >>43859938 >>43859963 >>43859990 >>43860132 >>43860277 >>43860305 >>43860411 >>43860428 >>43860477 >>43860511 >>43860828 >>43861192 >>43861224 >>43861552 >>43861850 [802/127] want to clear up some rumors about the Shuaiby suicide. I was his friend. Here is some backstory. become friends with an anon from here a month ago genuinely awesome guy to talk to, loved him so much had lots of fun staying up late discussing weeb things and whatnot group of friends constantly trying to help him through whatever he was going through goes through something with his mother we try to convince him that his parents care for him and that he should trust them It seems like he is doing ok for the most part one day, it really starts to bother him 186KiB, 335x265, rip.png View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO >sets up livestream and sends it to us >he does his thing, despite us trying to get him to not do it fast forward several hours people find the stream spread all over the internet within a matter of hours >people start making up many rumors about him, memeing him to s--- I can confirm that almost every single rumor that is being said about him is untrue. No, that was not his ex. Her name was not cat. It wasn't on skype. His mother was not the one crying. It's not fake. /r9k/ did not drive him to suicide There are only a select few people who were actually there, and none of them are going to post in this thread. We have lost a friend, a brother Rest in peace, Shuaiby. You will always be loved](https://i.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/list/001/351/812/f3b.png "I want to clear up some rumors about the Shuaiby suicide...")
