-
TikToker Cookie King Talks Luke Belmar, '99% Accuracy' Trend And Other Brainrot Memes That He Somehow Started -
What's With Jokes That Go 'No, It's Fine, I Just Didn't Think It Would Be Chinese'? Memes Inspired By A TikTok About 'Chinese Heaven' Explained -
See The Winner Of February 2025's Meme Of The Month! -
What Is The 'John Cena Heel Turn'? The Reasons Behind Cena's Villain Arc And Possible WWE Farewell Tour Explained -
Bingus The Sphynx Cat Became A Viral Meme Five Years Ago
-5
Here's the jury verdict form in Jan 6 case of John Strand of California, who was accused of boasting...
Uploaded by KZN02 Sep 28, 2022 at 01:14AM EDT
Origin Entry: January 6th, 2021, Storming of the United States Capitol
File type: jpg
Resolution: (679px x 747px)
File size: 51.4 KB
More:
Judge finds #BloodyHeadWound Kyle Fitzsimons GUILTY of felony civil disorder, GUILTY of obstruction of an official proceeding
Share Pin
A former Tulsa bank robber (68 months sentence) has pleaded guilty to taking part in the J6
Share Pin
Kurt Peterson, 66, of Hodgenville, Kentucky, pleaded GUILTY to a felony charge related to his actions at the Capitol on 1/6
Share Pin
Mugshot of Doug Jensen (guilty on all counts), who was part of crowd chasing officer Eugene Goodman
Share Pin
Andrew Alan Hernandez, 45, of Riverside, California, pleaded GUILTY to a felony charge relating to his actions at the Capitol on 1/6
Share Pin
Retired firefighter Robert Sanford pleaded guilty today, admitting he used a fire extinguisher at officers, striking three of them in a head.
Share Pin
-5
January 6th, 2021, Storming of the United States Capitol - Here's the jury verdict form in Jan 6 case of John Strand of California, who was accused of boasting...
| ◄ Previous | View Gallery Random Image | Next ► |
![Cite as: 601 U. S. (2024) 1 Opinion in Chambers NOTICE: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the United States Reports. Readers are requested to notify the Reporter of Decisions, Supreme Court of the United States, Washington, D. C. 20543, pio@supremecourt.gov, of any typographical or other formal errors. SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES No. 23A843 PETER K. NAVARRO v. UNITED STATES ON APPLICATION FOR RELEASE PENDING APPEAL [March 18, 2024] CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS, Circuit Justice. The application for release pending appeal under 18 U. S. C. §3143(b) is denied. This application concerns only the question whether the applicant, Peter Navarro, has met his burden to establish his entitlement to relief under the Bail Reform Act. The Court of Appeals disposed of the pro- ceeding on the ground that Navarro "forfeited" any argu- ment in this release proceeding challenging the District Court's conclusion that "executive privilege was not in- voked," "forfeited any challenge" to the conclusion that re- lief would not be required in any event because of the qual- ified nature of executive privilege, and "forfeited any challenge" to the conclusion that apart from executive priv- ilege, he was still obligated to appear before Congress and answer questions seeking information outside the scope of the asserted privilege. Order in No. 24-3006 (DC, Mar. 14, 2024). I see no basis to disagree with the determination that Navarro forfeited those arguments in the release pro- ceeding, which is distinct from his pending appeal on the merits.](https://i.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/list/002/777/693/692 "Peter NAVARRO is going to prison.")
Comments (0)
Add a Comment
Image Details
244 views (6 from today)
Uploaded Sep 28, 2022 at 01:14AM EDT
Source
Tags
About the Uploader
KZN02
Treasurer & Orator & Media Chauffeur
There are no comments currently available.
Display Comments