Now it's no secret that sequels to Disney movies are of noticeably lesser quality than their originals, but if you had to pick one to watch, which would it be and why
hard mode: no pixar
18,587 total conversations in 827 threads
Last posted
Sep 20, 2014 at 12:03AM EDT.
Added
Sep 08, 2014 at 01:09PM EDT
27 posts
from
20 users
Now it's no secret that sequels to Disney movies are of noticeably lesser quality than their originals, but if you had to pick one to watch, which would it be and why
hard mode: no pixar
It's honestly hard to come up with ones that haven't already been made.
But I'd definitely watch Pinocchio 2. He'd go on all kinds of adventures, and his new real-boy-ness would actually make him more physically vulnerable, adding to the suspense.
I'd watch the hell out of Tangled 2.
The Incredibles 2
Hard Mode: Tangled 2
Frozen 2: Burned
It appears that my question was misunderstood
oh well
Flubber 2. For obvious reasons. F-For. . . Obvious. . .Goddammit (TTnTT).
Wreck it Ralph 2 with a Mario Cameo.
Wreck-It-Ralph sequel needs to happen
Jill wrote:
>mfw people making up Disney sequels that they would watch instead of posting about what OP was actually talking about.
As for my choice, it should be obvious by the pic.
Oops looks like all of us missundertood OP :P
Well I guess it had to be the Lilo & Stitch one, but just because it was canon for the show.
I don't think I've ever seen a sequel to the major Disney films (except Fantasia 2000, but at the time I didn't know it was one). But if I were to pick one to start, I'll go with Mulan II. Mulan is my fav Disney film, so for that reason alone I'd be compelled to watch its sequel. I've got some free time on my hands, so maybe I'll go ahead and watch it :)
OH SHOOT THAT'S WHAT WE MEAN.
In that case, Cinderella 2 is the worst thing to ever be put in a VHS case.
BUT
May I recommend Cinderella 3. It's no masterpiece, but it is creative, and explores a little of the Ugly Stepsister's point of view.
I guess Lion King 2, or 1 and a half, or whatever the hell it's called.
Lion King 1 1/2 isn't that bad. I remember enjoying it when I way younger. Never really got into Lion King 2 though.
Slutty Sam wrote:
I guess Lion King 2, or 1 and a half, or whatever the hell it's called.
Actually, 1 1/2 is the third installment.
While Cinderella 3, The Little Mermaid 3, and Lion King 3 are relatively good, I'll go with Brother Bear 2. I'm a bit of a sucker for "True Love" stuff and it's story handled much better than those other sequels.
Abby of Many Fandoms wrote:
Actually, 1 1/2 is the third installment.
While Cinderella 3, The Little Mermaid 3, and Lion King 3 are relatively good, I'll go with Brother Bear 2. I'm a bit of a sucker for "True Love" stuff and it's story handled much better than those other sequels.
There's a good Brother Bear movie?
Lilo and Stitch 3: Stitch vs the God Emperor of Mankind
Jimmy 3, People 0 wrote:
There's a good Brother Bear movie?
Depends on your definition of "good" really.
Little Mermaid II
Cinderella III
Tron: Legacy
and Pirates of the Caribbean:All sequels
None, because Disney sequels inevitably are far inferior to the original films.
I have to say, i did enjoyed watching Atlantis 2. So i won't mind watching it again.
I also had a good laugh watching The Lion King 1 1/2.
Papa Coolface wrote:
None, because Disney sequels inevitably are far inferior to the original films.
You misspelled "inherently" :P
Wreck it Ralph most definitely. And I guess the Incredibles 2 as a close second.
After Shock wrote:
You misspelled "inherently" :P
Do you not know what "inevitably" means?
Star Wars VII ( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)
Papa Coolface wrote:
Do you not know what "inevitably" means?
Maybe, but I like overusing "inherently." =P
Also Inevitably tells that it's impossible to stop something while inherently states that a quality is rooted into the core of something.
ex: "Disney sequels inherently suck"
Already a memeber? | Don't have an account? |