Just watch.
.jpeg "What Is A 'Pink Tote Lid Moment'? How A TikTok About A Girl's Fight With Her Mom Created A New Slang Term"){kind=icon}
What Is A 'Pink Tote Lid Moment'? How A TikTok About A Girl's Fight With Her Mom Created A New Slang Term
The worst Phone ad I've ever seen.
Last posted
Jul 21, 2014 at 03:34PM EDT.
Added
Jul 18, 2014 at 08:43PM EDT
19 posts
from
15 users
damn squeakers
Wow, that made me cringe pretty hard. Especially the way they portrayed the kids.
Last edited Jul 18, 2014 at 08:52PM EDT
Because 9 year olds are the real demographic for James Bond and Hunger Games
"Screw the Features, we got Minecraft and Amazon Prime instead!"
Crimson Locks wrote:
Because 9 year olds are the real demographic for James Bond and Hunger Games
You jest, but that's strikingly close to being a true statement. Look at Call of Duty, its target audience is literally prepubescent boys.
Nine year old hipsters…
[Vomits]
Snickerway wrote:
You jest, but that's strikingly close to being a true statement. Look at Call of Duty, its target audience is literally prepubescent boys.
Uh… no.
For one, virtually all of the Call of Duty games carry a friggin' M rating, which strongly cautions parents against letting their children under the age of 17 play based on the content. I believe by definition that means that prepubescent boys are not the "literal" target demographic. Sure they're the reason that a fair proportion of the copies are bought, but that gives no evidence to conclude that was the developer's intent. So, your analogy is off.
And then there's the supposed "close to true statement". All of the original James Bond novels by Ian Fleming and the long-running series of films (barring a couple that are more immature and not well received, such as Die Another Day) are clearly targeted towards adults, and to suggest otherwise is pretty dumb. Yeah, The Hunger Games is a bit more arguable, but they're very definitely "young adult" novels and is marketed as such, with plenty of gory violence described throughout. The content of the films is toned down slightly (though it's visual, so on the other hand you could consider it even more intense), and in general it carries the "young adult" spirit, both being rated PG-13. Plus there's all the complex morals, messages and metaphors that 99% of nine-year-olds are not able to comprehend.
I've seen this commercial, it's unappealing. I have Amazon Prime, which is pretty good, but this commercial turns me off, especially the kids, who are now experts with phones.
unusedusername wrote:
Just watch.
Minecraft and Hunger Games?
No surprise.
you: "ugh this ad is soooo stupid"
(proceeds to share it online with other people so they can watch it as well)
you're a sucker
Captain Blubber wrote:
you: "ugh this ad is soooo stupid"
(proceeds to share it online with other people so they can watch it as well)
you're a sucker
Fucking 9 year old children with phones.
Boom
Welp… this makes 13 year olds now at least moderately tolerable.
>giving anybody under 13 a phone
0.9999...=1 wrote:
Uh… no.
For one, virtually all of the Call of Duty games carry a friggin' M rating, which strongly cautions parents against letting their children under the age of 17 play based on the content. I believe by definition that means that prepubescent boys are not the "literal" target demographic. Sure they're the reason that a fair proportion of the copies are bought, but that gives no evidence to conclude that was the developer's intent. So, your analogy is off.
And then there's the supposed "close to true statement". All of the original James Bond novels by Ian Fleming and the long-running series of films (barring a couple that are more immature and not well received, such as Die Another Day) are clearly targeted towards adults, and to suggest otherwise is pretty dumb. Yeah, The Hunger Games is a bit more arguable, but they're very definitely "young adult" novels and is marketed as such, with plenty of gory violence described throughout. The content of the films is toned down slightly (though it's visual, so on the other hand you could consider it even more intense), and in general it carries the "young adult" spirit, both being rated PG-13. Plus there's all the complex morals, messages and metaphors that 99% of nine-year-olds are not able to comprehend.
Well, nowadays their all rated M.
CoD one was rated T.
Patrick Star 3D Real wrote:
Well, nowadays their all rated M.
CoD one was rated T.
0.9999...=1 wrote:
Uh… no.
For one, virtually all of the Call of Duty games carry a friggin' M rating, which strongly cautions parents against letting their children under the age of 17 play based on the content. I believe by definition that means that prepubescent boys are not the "literal" target demographic. Sure they're the reason that a fair proportion of the copies are bought, but that gives no evidence to conclude that was the developer's intent. So, your analogy is off.
And then there's the supposed "close to true statement". All of the original James Bond novels by Ian Fleming and the long-running series of films (barring a couple that are more immature and not well received, such as Die Another Day) are clearly targeted towards adults, and to suggest otherwise is pretty dumb. Yeah, The Hunger Games is a bit more arguable, but they're very definitely "young adult" novels and is marketed as such, with plenty of gory violence described throughout. The content of the films is toned down slightly (though it's visual, so on the other hand you could consider it even more intense), and in general it carries the "young adult" spirit, both being rated PG-13. Plus there's all the complex morals, messages and metaphors that 99% of nine-year-olds are not able to comprehend.
lol at this guy for saying hunger games has complex morals, metaphors and messages.