Forums / Fun! / Riff-Raff

NeonWabbit wrote:

@Bob Kat

I'm not a trol, I'm just a brone /)

---

@RandomMan

But I actually paid that guy 5 bucks to get my opinion in the KYM printing press and now I'm broke :<

---

I just realized I haven't stated my opinion yet.

There is now going to be a display of my opinion, that it is, and it is mine.

I will now be stating my opinion, which I own, for I made it.

My opinion is the following line, after the next one.

Sir NeonWabbit's brand new factual opinion has this to say:

It is of my opinion that this is an opinion and it is not your opinion.

Thank you for listening to my opinion. *braces for downvotes*

Muffinlicious wrote:

I’m not a trol, I’m just a brone /)

ew gtfo we dont need horsefuckers on this site

NeonWabbit wrote:

I will just preface this by saying I am in fact 18 years old, I am white, and I do live in Australia. Do I think my problems are worse than those who aren't brones? Yes, yes I do. I can explain to you in detail. I am being memed on constantly. They meme on things I do, they meme on my emails, and they probably meme on the pones I watch, and you act like you are some big oppression? Non-brones get annoyed at brone antics, sure, but the time is going to come when the KYM government will permaban those who simply do not agree with them. Where men and women will not give their opinion anywhere. And for now, we have to pay a daily tax for every person who has not been memed on (lazy memefriends) and those who won't do anything memeworthy and will only buy drugs and alcohol, even Don would find the great memeing unbelievable. You act smug to people like me, but you don't even know the half of it.

I would fuck a horse though.

Philip J. Fry wrote:

I memed on your mom last night.

NeonWabbit wrote:

Just to be clear, I'm not a professional "opinion maker". I'm just an edgy adult who greatly values his intelligence and memetic fact over any silly backtalk against my brone-ness. That being said, I am open to any and all criticism. In this moment, I am euphoric. Not because of any brony faust's blessing. But because I am enlightened by my own opinion.

Muffinlicious wrote:

*tips fedora*

NeonWabbit wrote:

Here's the thing. You said a "ew gtfo we dont need horsefuckers on this site."
Is "need" the same as "want"? Yes. No one's arguing that.
As somebrone who is a meme scientist who just gave an opinion, I am telling you, specifically, in science, no one calls brones horsefuckers. If you want to be "specific" like you said, then you shouldn't either. They're not the same thing.
If you're saying "horsefucker" you're referring to the taxonomic grouping of sub-brones, which includes scientific words such as "fanfiction author".
So your reasoning for calling a brone a horsefucker is because random people "call the brones horsefuckers?" Let's get "clopper" and "grimdarkist" in there, then, too.
A horsefucker is a horsefucker and a member of the brone family. But that's not what you said. You said a brone is a horsefucker, which is not true unless you're okay with calling all members of the brone family brones, which means you'd call furries brones, too. Which you said you don't.
It's okay to just admit you're wrong, you know?

NeonWabbit wrote:

Here's the thing. You said a "ew gtfo we dont need horsefuckers on this site."
Is "need" the same as "want"? Yes. No one's arguing that.
As somebrone who is a meme scientist who just gave an opinion, I am telling you, specifically, in science, no one calls brones horsefuckers. If you want to be "specific" like you said, then you shouldn't either. They're not the same thing.
If you're saying "horsefucker" you're referring to the taxonomic grouping of sub-brones, which includes scientific words such as "fanfiction author".
So your reasoning for calling a brone a horsefucker is because random people "call the brones horsefuckers?" Let's get "clopper" and "grimdarkist" in there, then, too.
A horsefucker is a horsefucker and a member of the brone family. But that's not what you said. You said a brone is a horsefucker, which is not true unless you're okay with calling all members of the brone family brones, which means you'd call furries brones, too. Which you said you don't.
It's okay to just admit you're wrong, you know?

NeonWabbit wrote:

Here's the thing. You said a "ew gtfo we dont need horsefuckers on this site."
Is "need" the same as "want"? Yes. No one's arguing that.
As somebrone who is a meme scientist who just gave an opinion, I am telling you, specifically, in science, no one calls brones horsefuckers. If you want to be "specific" like you said, then you shouldn't either. They're not the same thing.
If you're saying "horsefucker" you're referring to the taxonomic grouping of sub-brones, which includes scientific words such as "fanfiction author".
So your reasoning for calling a brone a horsefucker is because random people "call the brones horsefuckers?" Let's get "clopper" and "grimdarkist" in there, then, too.
A horsefucker is a horsefucker and a member of the brone family. But that's not what you said. You said a brone is a horsefucker, which is not true unless you're okay with calling all members of the brone family brones, which means you'd call furries brones, too. Which you said you don't.
It's okay to just admit you're wrong, you know?

Blue Screen (of Death) wrote:

Your opinion is of interest to me. Do tell in your opinionated opinion, how does your scientific opinion account for the existence of 'brownes' and their taxonomic, denominational, demographic ethnic correlation with 'brones'. Not to mention the lesser known 'bronzs' and 'braines'. Can they also, in your scientific opinion, be designated as "horsefucker", opinion wise?

NeonWabbit wrote:

I have no idea, actually.

But, I'd like to know one thing.
Which one of you brones used my post from "KnowYourMeme Thread Simulator v1.0" to GET the 10444444th post on 4chan's /mlp/ last year?

Archive of that post and its replies can be found here: http://archive.heinessen.com/mlp/thread/10444444 (NSFW)