Keep the opinion if you want, but leave the slurs out of it.
Don't go into the how "queer" is used by LGBTQ people. You obviously meant it in a derogatory manner.
This is very unfortunate, because someone waa bullied and because someone committed suicide. Nothing good happened here. But it does raise a burgeoning public health matter that does need to be discussed and researched.
It is fine and good to be gay or to just simply have sex with men if you're a male (men who have sex with men or MSM…Not "mainstream media".) I don't think she was placing or reinforcing an unfair stigma on gay men. In fact, I don't think she talked about gay men or MSM in the general population. I think she just meant guys who did gay porn.
Because there is, without a doubt, due to the nature of porn and gay sex, a much higher risk of transmitting STIs including HIV from people in porn AND from MSM.
In porn, condoms aren't usually used. And you have all kinds of sex including anal with a lot of different actors.
So
- Sex with a lot of different partners
- Sex with partners who have sex with a lot of different partners
- Vigorous, penetrative anal sex
- Sex without condoms (how many scenes have you seen or imagine shows the guy putting on a rubber?)
Each of those increases your risk of contracting an STI.
Add
- Sex with men who have had sex with other men
…And the risk increases when further:
While CDC estimates that four percent of men in the United States are MSM, the rate of new HIV diagnoses among
them is more than 44 times that of other men (rate ranges from 522 to 989 per 100,000 MSM compared to
12 per 100,000 other men).
You can find that stat among others in the fact sheets on this CDC page.
So basically, the high risk you already have working in porn increases up to 44-fold in you include MSM (and perhaps more, because MSM in porn are likely more promiscuous than MSM in the population at large.)
It'd be different if it increase in risk was small, like a 5% increase. But 44 times is a 4400% increase in risk.
Just because you get paid for having risky sex on camera doesn't mean the risk is minimized any. And even though there is an inherent risk to porn in terms of STIs, that doesn't mean you accept every risk or don't try to minimize the risk in the ways you can afford.
So this is a matter of public health,
That conflicts with potentially reinforcing a stigma of a minority group.
So if you can choose who you can work with for reasons of public health backed by CDC statistics, then why in the world wouldn't you if you could afford it?
Or let's take it further:
I read an article that there is a stigma for men who work with black men.
According to this, Alexis Texas is a well-known actress who has done at least 100 films but never with a black man. And she gets no drawback (so maybe you protect yourself by having preferences or even prerequisites but never making a Twitter post about it, not that it excuses bullying.)
So if someone like her can have sex with people based on the reasons she has not based in personal health
Then I understand why she would avoid sex with MSM, especially with no condom.