Fusking
About
Fusking (sometimes known as Fuskering) is a method of extracting photos from private galleries on free image hosting services. It is primarily used to obtain pornographic images from private photo albums maintained on either paid pornographic websites or personal image hosting websites like Photobucket and Tinypic.
Origin
The word "fusking" stems from a Danish word[12] used to describe a person who was secretly doing work outside of their established trade. The first code written using this name was created by CarthagTuek, the handle of a Danish man named Mikkel Eriksen, early as 2002. He announced the third version of a script site known as Fusker on his blog Sensible Erection[2] on March 5th, 2002. The site, which is only now available as an archive[13], utilized a Perl CGI script that was coded similarly to a UNIX/Linux cURL tool to find a library of similarly named files on any image hosting website. It was initially made to scrape porn sites which had sample photos in a public album, using subsequent file names to find the paid photos.
Spread
On March 20th, 2002, CarthagTuek posted a LiveJournal entry[14] claiming his site had received 250 megabytes of traffic in one day and was the third top referrer to a lesbian pornography site. When another user asked if he was going to take down Fusker, CarthageTuek stated that he was waiting for a cease and desist.
By September 2006, fusking had grown into a widespread practice on Photobucket[16], a free image sharing service popular with MySpace users. Even if a user marked their album as private, fuskers could bypass Photobucket’s settings by guessing exact URLs for the images based on common file names, for example IMG, DSCF or PICT. The earliest known mention of fusking Photobucket files dates back to September 2006 in a thread posted on the tech forum Rohitab[15] where a user proved the exploit with screenshots of a locked album.
Five days after the Rohitab forum post, the image aggregator site FuskerFind[9] was launched, where users could tag previously fusked links to make them searchable. Months later in May 2007, a discussion thread on the topic of fusking was posted on the BodyBuilding forums.[17] A year later in March 2008, a Photobucket-specific fusker site, PhotoFusker[11] was launched. That year, the image-hunting practice was also discussed on the paintball enthusiast forum PBNation[18], hackers.org[21] and the Nav.Net forum[19], which also went onto launch a Fusking software program[8] later that year. 2008 also marked the year that Fusking was discussed in the mainstream news media for the first time, when Fox 11 in Los Angeles covered the Photobucket exploit, but did not use the term “fusking” when describing the incident.
In the following years, various discussions regarding its methods and legality continued to surface on tech-related and humor forums like Black Hat World forum[22] and eBaum’s World[5] among others. In addition, the first definition of the term "Fusking" was submitted to Urban Dictionary[20] in May 2009. On October 6th, 2011, a subreddit titled Photobucket Plunders[6] was established as a place for fuskers to post their findings. Buzzfeed[4] and Gawker[3] subsequently drew attention to this community, and its companion /r/RequestAPlunder[7] in August 2012, revealing the simple method to retrieve private photos and Photobucket's relative ignorance of the exploit.
Photobucket's Response
On August 13th, 2012, ReadWriteWeb[23] noted that Photobucket updated their privacy poilcy adding in the fact that the site cannot ensure that the photos will stay secure on their servers. The article also stated that the ability to scramble file names when uploading images to Photobucket has been available since 2010[24], but was not made well-known. Two days later, the moderator of /r/RequestAPlunder reported[26] they had received a DMCA takedown notice for their subreddit. The following day, the Daily Dot[25] reported that /r/PhotobucketPlunder received a similar letter. On the 16th, /r/PhotobucketPlunder reported they had "gone dark"[27], but six threads remained as of the following day. These takedowns were also covered on the Huffington Post[28] and Gawker.[29] Despite the legal notice, 1800 subscribers switched over to /r/PhotoPlunder[30], which was thought to avert the DMCA since "Photobucket" is not mentioned in its name.
Search Interest
External References
[2] Sensible Erection – Fusker v.3.0
[3] Gawker – Ladies: 8,000 Creeps on Reddit Are Sharing the Nude Photos You Posted to Photobucket
[4] Buzzfeed – The Dark Art of Fusking
[5] eBaum's World Forum – Stupid photobucket cunts!
[6] Reddit – /r/PhotobucketPlunder
[7] Reddit – /r/RequestAPlunder
[9] FuskerFind | October 1st, 2006
[10] FabulousFusker | June 28th, 2011
[11] PhotoFusker | March 15th, 2008
[14] LiveJournal – SOME EXTRACTS OH GOD OH YEAH AHAHA AKFAHEFSHD
[15] rohitab – photobucket hack proof
[16] Wikipedia – Photobucket
[17] BodyBuilding Forums – is there a way to hack a photobucket?
[18] PBNation – Photobucket Hack Program
[19] Nav.net forums – fusker photobucket password
[20] Urban Dictionary – Fusking
[21] ha.ckers – Photobucket Allows Public Access To Private Photos
[22] BlackHat World – Anyone Tried Photobucket Fusking?
[23] ReadWriteWeb – Your Nude Photobucket Photos Can Still Get Fusked
[24] Photobucket Customer Support Home – Additional Privacy Options for Users – Scramble Photo and Video File Names
[25] Daily Dot – Photobucket shuts down Reddit's nude-photo thieves
[26] Reddit – Just received this. What do I do?
[27] Reddit – Gone dark.
[28] Huffington Post – Fusking: Photobucket Fights Back Against Peeping Toms, Sends Takedown Notice To Reddit Pages
[29] Gawker – Despite Takedown Notice, Reddit’s Creepiest Community Is Still Sharing Your Nudes
[30] Reddit – Photo Plunder
Recent Videos
There are no videos currently available.
Top Comments
alex1128
Aug 09, 2012 at 08:39PM EDT
kman976
Aug 09, 2012 at 12:34PM EDT