'lo! You must login or signup first!

How SJWs DefendcENsORSHI CENSORSHI Only the government can censor things," "you don't know what censorship is," there's no law saying these changes had to be made," "it's not censorship! titutions. You don't need to file a lawsuit to censor something. SJWs are trying to redefine what "censorshi re f ideas and art. Censorship doesn't have to be enforced by law or carried out by governme lets them off the hook when they try to censor things that are not politically correct according to their ideologies The game devs chose to make the change, not SJWs," "you don't know why they removed that content." SJWs are trying to play innocent after builiding a career around politically charged smear campaigns against video games. Using Fatal Frame 5 as an example, we know for a fact that the developers wanted the bikini and lingerie costumes in the game because both costumes made it into the final Japanese release of the game. If they didn't want it in the game, they wouldn't have put it in the final version of the game. It was removed from the American release, and there's only one group of Americans who would find the costumes problematic: SJWs. The same group of people who wrote defamat cases of DOAX3 and Compile Hearts, the developers outright stated that SJW shitflining was the reason the game would not be released in the west. With Hatred and Yohjo Simulator, SJWs directly got the games pulled from distributio articles on DOAX2 for seven years s Anime t------! Serious business!" "Don't take away my bikini waifus!" "You're just a pervert!" SJWs are trying to excuse censorship by belittling the significance of the very thing being censored. When NewSouth Books decided to remove the word 'n-----' from Mark Twain's Huckleberry Finn, people didn't get upset because they like reading the word n-----,' and when a fig leaf was placed over Michelangelo's Statue of David, people didn't get upset because they liked looking at flacid marble penises. The actual item being censored is not important, it's the censorship itself that people care about. The supression of ideas and art is what upsets people. SJWs cern David's micropenis for being "obscene ng a bikini for being "misogynist" is no different from censoring ost of the game is still there," "a lit It's just boobs/blood being censored," "m tle censorship is okay." What constitutes as 'a little' censorship? Where do we draw the line between what an 'acceptable level of censorship' is versus an t blood? Is it okay to remove an obscene gesture but not a sexual innuendo? How about removing an entire character, or an entire side-quest? It is impossible to measure what an 'acceptable level of censorship' is. 'A little censorship' i able, because so long as people can poi had worse censorship than this!' the harder it will be to convince people to leave future games in tact. It's SJWs don't realize when they say "who cares if trash is censored?" they are admitting that they condone censorship. I think Marcel Duchamp's scuplture The Fountain" is trash. It's just a urinal turned on its side and I think it's stupid, but that doesn't mean it doesn't have the right to exist. Duchamp's F for that reason it's a significant work, but it's still trash. The film 'Troll 2 i enjoy it for how trashy it is. I would argue that Jurassic World' is trash too, but it's grossed over a billion dollars worldwide. The les anyway. Who cares if trash is censored?" nta now the de facto example when people discuss what constitutes as art, and lso trash, but it's gained a cult following and many people t be trash to someone else, and just because it's trash do can "It's paedophilia!" "Are you a paedo?! I bet you are!" f paedophilia to cover up three very important things: these games depicting 'underage Simulator, Xenoblade characters never contained nudity or sex in the first place (Dead or Alive Xtreme Beach Volleyba Chronicles X, Blade & Soul, etc). Even if they did contain underage nudity, they wouldn't constitute as child p----------, this is how mo like Blue Lagoon and bo like Nabokov's L----- exist. Lastly, they're not real peo Fictional characters do You should boycott the game developers for being cowards and letting SJWs tell them what to do." We should boycott the victims re is especially funny because not buying games that are mi un-PC is exactly what SJWs wa to do in the first place. So instead of boycotting them for being ci now we should boycott them for being scared of losing their job from the SJW menace. SJWs thin u are stupid enough to boycott games u want un-censored "You're the one censoring game developers by demanding fanservice! Noticehow literally no one is demanding Naughty Dog add bikinis to The Last of Us or demanding From Soft put bikinis into Bloodborne. This is because these game and lingerie costumes in them, they aren't demanding the game be changed to suit their preferences, they're demanding the game in the first place. When people demand Fatal Frame 5 have the biki naltered form, as the game creator originally intended. SJWs are so dumb they thirn can censor someone b demanding their work be uncensored "They're not really censored," "it's a marketing tactic, you idio!" "you're falling for their viral marketing! This conspiracy theory is especially preve and they're generating fake controversy. There is previous DOAX titles sold poorly in the west, when in fact they sold better in the west. The idea that Team Ninja is making a t with Dead or Alive Xtreme 3. SJWs think Team Ninja and Play-Asia are in cahoots o proof to support this theory but let's debu an y. SJWs pretend that o not sell their game to their largest market, and this will somehow cause them to make more money is insane Also, I don't think there are many people 'on the fence' about getting DOAX3, but now due to the controversy have chosen to import it. You either buy sexy volleyball games u don't. Who waits for controversy to buy a game? Ironic how SJWs get accused of censorship and then anti-SJWs try to censor them." SJWs think you're too stupid to know the difference between expressing an opinion versus supressing an opini censoring SJWs. No one tried to get Gone Home or Her Story pulled from Steam. No one tried to censor Dragon Age: Inquisition by claiming it was harmful to society. Nobody deleted the hundreds of Indivisible threads begging for funds. Disagreeing with a SJW is re ne by disagreeing with them They're just bloggers. They have no influence or real power," "SJWs didn't censor anyone because they cannot censor anyone." u cannot pretend SJWs have no power when they have done the following: gotten Grand Theft Auto 5 pulled from Target and K-Mart in Australia for being "sex developers of Hatred being Nazis, gotten Yohjo Simulator pulled from Steam, prevented DOAX3 from being released in the west prevented Compile Hearts from localizing games in the west, completely rewrote side-quests in Blade & Soul, and Ben Batema (@Benspants) gloated on Twitter about his ability to cen main employer of those SJWs bloggers, is a $300,000,000 company and the United States 45th most popular online property. You cannot claim SJWs have no power when they are a multi-million dollar conglomerate who control the video game industry ly violent," gotten Hatred pulled from Steam for being too vi spread libel about the game ism/sexism" in video games. Let's not forget that Gawker Media, the

+13

How SJWs Defend Censorship


Uploaded by rhh Dec 10, 2015 at 09:29AM EST

Share Pin Download More

Origin Entry: Social Justice Blogging

File type: jpg

Resolution: (1024px x 1912px)

File size: 595 KB


liberal news in a nutshell
"Imgur":http://imgur.com/zKIGC
The person who wrote this deleted the post, but I still have the evidence. That person shall be anonymous, though that doesn't excuse this insipid post. If posting anime pics is punishable by death, then what do you think of dubbing?
View All 210 Images

Load 11 Comments

Moar:

Top Comments

BronyConundrum
Delete
Sensitive
BronyConundrum

As for GTA V getting pulled from K-Mart and Target in Australia, it's worth noting that Rockstar themselves came out and basically said that the SJWs were full of shit in that regard, and outright telling them to just not play it if they don't like it. So, maybe we can take some solace in knowing that not every game developer is going to roll over and let the vocal minority trample all over them.

+6
Reply

+ Add a Comment

Comments (11)


Display Comments

Add a Comment


+ Add an Image

Image Details

2,279 views (10 from today)

Uploaded Dec 10, 2015 at 09:29AM EST

Origin Entry

Social Justice Blogging

Tags

gamergate, gg, sjw, social justice warrior, censorship, doax3

Claim Authorship Edit History
Textile Embed