590 Views • Created 8 years ago By Ari Spool • Updated 6 years ago Share →
Created By Ari Spool • Updated 6 years ago
Tags:
Origin Entry:
Notes
![Case 5:16-cm-00010-SP Document 1 Filed 02/19/16 Page 8 of 35 Page ID#18 1 appears to be based on its concern for its business model and public 2 |brand marketing strategy.2 3 Accordingly, the government now brings this motion to compel 4 While the Order includes the provision that "to the extent that Apple 5 believes that compliance with this Order would be unreasonably 6 burdensome, it may make an application to this Court for relief 7 within five business days of receipt of the Order, " Apple' s public 8statement makes clear that Apple will not comply with the Court' s 9 Order. The government does not seek to deny Apple its right to be 10 heard, and expects these issues to be fully briefed before the Court; 11 however, the urgency of this investigation requires this motion now 12 that Apple has made its intention not to comply patently clear 13This aspect of the investigation into the December 2, 2015 terrorist 14 attack must move forward 15 II. STATEMENT OF FACTS 16 17 Act order, and the Declaration of FBI Supervisory Special Agent 18("SSA") Christopher Pluhar, which was attached thereto, both of which 19were filed on February 16, 2016, the FBI has been investigating the 20 As set forth in the government's application for the All Writs 2 As Apple has stated on its web page, "Our commitment to customer privacy doesn't stop because of a government information request. Unlike our competitors, Apple cannot bypass your passcode and therefore cannot access this data. So it' s not technically feasible for us to respond to government warrants for the extraction of this data from devices in their possession running ios8." (https://web.archive.org/web/20140918023950/http://www.apple.com/priv acy/government-informaton-requests/)Notably, notwithstanding this previous statement, Apple concedes that it has retained the ability to do as the Court rde red 23 24 25 26 this Court's February 16, 2016, order is not legally necessary, in 27 stated interest in adversarial testing of the order's legal merits, 28 due process and adversarial testing it seeks Although a separate order compelling Apple' s compliance with light of Apple' s publicly stated " [o] pposing [of] this order" and its the government files this noticed motion to provide Apple with the 3](https://i.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/list/001/084/249/604.jpg)
Today's Top Image Galleries
Morrigan x Spider-Man |
Oilers Girl |
That Casually Misogynistic Remark |
HMP Wandsworth Prison Guard Video With Inmate |
![Anonymous 06/30/24(Sun)11:27:34 No. 78003010 [Reply] >>78003032 >Went to make some toast with honey >The honey bottle is filled with dead ants My day is f------ ruined >> Anonymous 06/30/24(Sun)11:30:59 No.78003032 >>78003010 (OP) That's gotta be at least a few extra grams of protein right there. Anonymous 06/30/24(Sun)11:58:23 No.78003204 Why not heat it up and scrape them off?](https://i.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/masonry/002/850/628/1ab.png)
![Anonymous 06/30/24(Sun)11:27:34 No. 78003010 [Reply] >>78003032 >Went to make some toast with honey >The honey bottle is filled with dead ants My day is f------ ruined >> Anonymous 06/30/24(Sun)11:30:59 No.78003032 >>78003010 (OP) That's gotta be at least a few extra grams of protein right there. Anonymous 06/30/24(Sun)11:58:23 No.78003204 Why not heat it up and scrape them off?](https://i.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/original/002/850/628/1ab.png)
Comments ( 1 )
Sorry, but you must activate your account to post a comment.