-
Last Year, The Glasses Loopy Plushie Began Plaguing The Internet -
'Ben Swolo' Graced Screens On This Day Seven Years Ago -
Ai16z Token Is The Newest AI Agent Meme Coin Going Viral On Twitter -
This AI-Generated Trailer For A Cat-Companion Game Unveiled At The Game Awards Is Ruffling Feathers -
Six Years Ago, Miles Morales Said 'Hey'
+40
:<
Uploaded by Kung Fu Cthulhu Jul 15, 2016 at 11:05PM EDT
ghostbusters franchise killer slimer facebook ghostbusters reboot controversy
Origin Entry: Ghostbusters Reboot Controversy
File type: jpg
Resolution: (698px x 536px)
File size: 43.7 KB
!["Ghostbusters': All-Female Reboot a Victim of 2016's 'Anti-Hillary Movement, Says Director Paul l'eig By J. Kim Murphy V "Some really brilliant author or researcher or sociologist needs to write a book about 2016 and how intertwined [our film was] with Hillary [Clinton] and the anti-Hillary movement," Feig said. "It was just this everyone went to a boiling point. I don't know if it was [having] an African- year where American president for eight years [that] teed them up or something, but they were just ready to explode... By the time, in 2014 or 2015, when I announced I was going to [make] it, it started." Feig went on to point toward President Trump's own negative comments regarding the film as indicative of a larger ideological tie between the criticism both faced. "It's crazy how people got nuts about women trying to be in power or trying to be in positions that they weren't normally in," Feig said. "It was an ugly, ugly year." How many times do we have to teach you this LESSON, Paul Feig?! BUS STOP](https://i.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/list/001/855/349/02f.png "Paul Feig never learn his lesson")
More:
Comments (11)
Add a Comment
Image Details
2,878 views (10 from today)
Uploaded Jul 15, 2016 at 11:05PM EDT
Origin Entry
About the Uploader
.png "Kung Fu Cthulhu"){kind=icon}
Kung Fu Cthulhu
Researcher & Treasurer & Elocutionist & Media Bus Boy
Top Comments
Hrom
Jul 16, 2016 at 06:46PM EDT
TheLastMethBender
Jul 16, 2016 at 07:55PM EDT in reply to