Taxation is theft. Governments earn revenue through robbery If there exists a State which attempts to fund its existence through involuntary payments at gunpoint, such funding constitutes thievery. Consider a hypothetical public institution which has sovereign rights to some area of land. Rather than alleviate its necessary financial burdens through noncompulsory donations from the residents of this area of land, it chooses to impose force via threats of imprisonment and violence if a resident were to resist demands for payment. It should be at once clear that such an institution, regardless of its intentions or purchases, is effectively committing an act of armed pilferage on a massive scale. If analyzed with a critical eye-one wiling to put aside unfounded notions regardingt the proper ethical a person and the groups who hold power over said person, one willing to entertain previously unconsidered notions, one willing to accept that unflattering labels might be fairly levied against a abiquitous and unchallenged aspect of modern society-it should become immediately obvious to the impartial observer that there exists an unspoken equivalency, one that pairs two concepts often incorrectly considered to be entirely distinct not just with respect to morality, but in all categories. The first element of this pair of equivalent ideas is that of tariffs, the method of monetary accumalation that mest every group of powerful individuals has implemented to generate their own incomes, Such accumulation, as you surely know, is not based on consenting persons agreeing to subsidize the public services said group provides. Rather, those in power will demand capital with the hacking of armed employees of the elites. Were an individual to choose not to provide capital. said elites would not merely deny the individual the benefits of their services, as would any private group in a similar scenario, but would utilize their armed employees as extorters, with the necessity of their services being a foregone conelusion if one wishes to remain alive and free. The second elenment of our illustrated equivalency is that of heists, five-finger discounts, rip-offs, stickups, lurglary- all names for the same morally reprehensible concept. Yes, these two ideas are in fact one and th老same. Think about it.

Share Pin Download More

Origin Entry: Anarcho-Capitalism

File type: jpg

Resolution: (391px x 960px)

File size: 111 KB

COME AND TAKE IT

??? Human nature DUMMIES Economics for DUMMIES

alberty Hangout Liberty Hangout @LibertyHangout Voting is not a human right. Government is a tool of coercion, and you have no right to vote for socialist policies to be forced on the American people. While Democrats talk about expanding voting rights, Republicans should discuss shrinking them. There need to be less voters. 8:25 PM 24 Nov 19 Twitter for Android 34 Retweets 276 Likes

View All 129 Images

More:

+9

Anarcho-Capitalism - The elimination of the state in favor of individual sovereignty, private property, and free markets

PROTIP: Press the ← and → keys to navigate the gallery, 'g' to view the gallery, or 'r' to view a random image.

Taxation is theft. Governments earn revenue through robbery If there exists a State which attempts to fund its existence through involuntary payments at gunpoint, such funding constitutes thievery. Consider a hypothetical public institution which has sovereign rights to some area of land. Rather than alleviate its necessary financial burdens through noncompulsory donations from the residents of this area of land, it chooses to impose force via threats of imprisonment and violence if a resident were to resist demands for payment. It should be at once clear that such an institution, regardless of its intentions or purchases, is effectively committing an act of armed pilferage on a massive scale. If analyzed with a critical eye-one wiling to put aside unfounded notions regardingt the proper ethical a person and the groups who hold power over said person, one willing to entertain previously unconsidered notions, one willing to accept that unflattering labels might be fairly levied against a abiquitous and unchallenged aspect of modern society-it should become immediately obvious to the impartial observer that there exists an unspoken equivalency, one that pairs two concepts often incorrectly considered to be entirely distinct not just with respect to morality, but in all categories. The first element of this pair of equivalent ideas is that of tariffs, the method of monetary accumalation that mest every group of powerful individuals has implemented to generate their own incomes, Such accumulation, as you surely know, is not based on consenting persons agreeing to subsidize the public services said group provides. Rather, those in power will demand capital with the hacking of armed employees of the elites. Were an individual to choose not to provide capital. said elites would not merely deny the individual the benefits of their services, as would any private group in a similar scenario, but would utilize their armed employees as extorters, with the necessity of their services being a foregone conelusion if one wishes to remain alive and free. The second elenment of our illustrated equivalency is that of heists, five-finger discounts, rip-offs, stickups, lurglary- all names for the same morally reprehensible concept. Yes, these two ideas are in fact one and th老same. Think about it.

View Gallery Random Image

+ Add a Comment

Comments (0)

There are no comments currently available.

Display Comments