i'm not okay to say that gen 6 and 7 were lazy (especially 7).
that's true, there was less pokemons designed in those 2 last generations, and mega evolutions and Z-attacks were more gimmicks than real gameplay changes.
But i'm against rejected all the ideas brought by these games and class them as "start of the fall" just because… actually i don't even know what's the real matter about those games.
Gen 6 and 7 brought a pretty cool map design (Illumis designed around the eponym city and the 4 islands of Alola), Gen 7 had the alolan version, totem pokemons to change from arena battle, skull team, chimera pokemons wich was a pretty good idea to create a post game content.
I'm pissed off about gen 8 too because of the lack of national dex. But even here, the wild zones are a real good idea too refresh the pokemon serie.
Because the real thing is that i'm scared that thinking that gen 1 to 5 were perfect and gen 6, 7 and 8 did nothing good will only make the pokemon serie stagnate.
So please be against bad decisions, not good games with bad decisions.
Top Comments
Mr. Candles
Jun 14, 2019 at 11:53AM EDT
polipeptide
Jun 15, 2019 at 02:31PM EDT