What Is The 'Homer Sharingan' Meme On TikTok? The Viral 'Simpsons x Naruto' Crossover Memes Explained
-1
January 6th, 2021, Storming of the United States Capitol - Tyrone McFadden & Carrie Williams of Baltimore are arrested in Jan 6 case.
![The very next day after the riot, on January 7, 2021, WILLIAMS and Mileur discussed the possible consequences of their actions and described taking down their Facebook posts. They had the following exchange through Facebook: WILLIAMS: So the news said the government wants people to turn over any videos of people who stormed the capital Dont Mileur: WILLIAMS: Im not lol Mileur: WILLIAMS: Yes Have u taken it down yet [...] Still had a blast but calling us domestic terrorist I noticed Im not taking the pics down though Based on the foregoing, your affiant submits that there is probable cause to believe that WILLIAMS: Mileur: WILLIAMS:](https://i.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/newsfeed/002/431/338/22c)
| ◄ Previous | View Gallery Random Image | Next ► |
![Cite as: 601 U. S. (2024) 1 Opinion in Chambers NOTICE: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the United States Reports. Readers are requested to notify the Reporter of Decisions, Supreme Court of the United States, Washington, D. C. 20543, pio@supremecourt.gov, of any typographical or other formal errors. SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES No. 23A843 PETER K. NAVARRO v. UNITED STATES ON APPLICATION FOR RELEASE PENDING APPEAL [March 18, 2024] CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS, Circuit Justice. The application for release pending appeal under 18 U. S. C. §3143(b) is denied. This application concerns only the question whether the applicant, Peter Navarro, has met his burden to establish his entitlement to relief under the Bail Reform Act. The Court of Appeals disposed of the pro- ceeding on the ground that Navarro "forfeited" any argu- ment in this release proceeding challenging the District Court's conclusion that "executive privilege was not in- voked," "forfeited any challenge" to the conclusion that re- lief would not be required in any event because of the qual- ified nature of executive privilege, and "forfeited any challenge" to the conclusion that apart from executive priv- ilege, he was still obligated to appear before Congress and answer questions seeking information outside the scope of the asserted privilege. Order in No. 24-3006 (DC, Mar. 14, 2024). I see no basis to disagree with the determination that Navarro forfeited those arguments in the release pro- ceeding, which is distinct from his pending appeal on the merits.](https://i.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/list/002/777/693/692 "Peter NAVARRO is going to prison.")
There are no comments currently available.
Display Comments