What Is An 'Anxiety Pen' And Why Did Charli D'Amelio Admit She Never Used One? The Viral TikTok Video Explained
What's Up With The Interview Of The Hippie 'Phish' Chick Amy? The Viral Video Of A Girl Selling Hemp Jewelry Outside A Phish Show Explained
Did Elon Musk Really Do A 'Sieg Heil' Salute At President Donald Trump's Inauguration? Musk's Response To The Accusations And Controversy Explained
It's Been Four Years Since Bernie Sanders Went Viral For This Iconic Photo Of Him At Biden's Inauguration
It's Not Friday, But It Is The Anniversary Of This Flattie's Weekly Meme

In the absense of any other evidence, which seems more likely? Let's look at what each position requires to be true Well, for the first narrative to be true you have to assume that tens of thousands of gamers condone and support these atrocious and terroristic behaviours and are all simply hating on a small collection of people. It also requires that the diverse voices of women and under-represented people are deluded or too ignorant to think for them selves For the second narrative to be true you have to assume that a handful of games media figures have been caught getting too cozy and caught engaging in questionable behaviour and are using their influence in the media to mis represent many, many people as simply toxic so as to distract and mislead others so as to avoid taking responsibil ty for their own mistakes. Which do you feel is the more logicall? The one that assumes tens of thousands of gamers (Men, Women and under-represented individuals) are all simply hostile, stubborn, ignorant, deluded and maybe even mentally ill? Or the one that assumes that a small group of people simply don't want to fess up to having been caught engaging in problematic behaviour? You decide. You have made it this far so you clearly have the mind to think critically WHY NOT BOTH? memetene rator.net

Share Pin Download More

gamergate whynotboth

Origin Entry: GamerGate

File type: png

Resolution: (600px x 804px)

File size: 325 KB

_"*I guess i had to do it if only because people are expecting me to do it. I didn’t even remember this was a thing till yesterday XD*"_

Had to add this because I thought that ppl would actually click the source link and look at the description after all this time

Like...is there any solution to this? Should we start something?

Jalen Hutchinson Studied Culinary Science at Culinary Institute of America (Graduated 2014). Author has 304 answers and 740.1K answer views. 5y Not that I care that much either way, but it did expose a lot of corrupt game developers and game journalists. X Journalists would make claims of people like Anita Sarkeesian "playing video games all her life" when she openly admitted many times she is not a gamer and only starter recently (when it wasn't for an interview). Various developers trading sex or money for good reviews got exposed, journalists who accepted got exposed. People became a bit more critical about supporting a game just because the developer has a victim complex stating tat their game could have only failed because of sexism, instead of their own poor developing skills. What really sealed the deal was opposition often faking their own harassment. Anita sarkeesian and Zoe Quinn have been caught multiple times screenshotting "harassment" while showing that the harrasser's account name in the login. Or when someone called the police to help Sarkeesian against a "very real threat" she was posting about, only for police to find the harasser's messages were coming from her IP address. I just want honesty from the community, and the lies were mostly exposed by the "dreaded" gamergate. 1.3K views • View upvotes 26

View All 4,079 Images

Load 4 Comments

Moar:

-16

GamerGate - Gamergate Neutrality

PROTIP: Press the ← and → keys to navigate the gallery, 'g' to view the gallery, or 'r' to view a random image.

In the absense of any other evidence, which seems more likely? Let's look at what each position requires to be true Well, for the first narrative to be true you have to assume that tens of thousands of gamers condone and support these atrocious and terroristic behaviours and are all simply hating on a small collection of people. It also requires that the diverse voices of women and under-represented people are deluded or too ignorant to think for them selves For the second narrative to be true you have to assume that a handful of games media figures have been caught getting too cozy and caught engaging in questionable behaviour and are using their influence in the media to mis represent many, many people as simply toxic so as to distract and mislead others so as to avoid taking responsibil ty for their own mistakes. Which do you feel is the more logicall? The one that assumes tens of thousands of gamers (Men, Women and under-represented individuals) are all simply hostile, stubborn, ignorant, deluded and maybe even mentally ill? Or the one that assumes that a small group of people simply don't want to fess up to having been caught engaging in problematic behaviour? You decide. You have made it this far so you clearly have the mind to think critically WHY NOT BOTH? memetene rator.net

View Gallery Random Image

+ Add a Comment

Comments (4)

Display Comments