Hello! You must login or signup first!

https://twitter.com/WhiteHouse/status/614611810415681536/photo/1

+26

White House Lit up with Pride.


Uploaded by Conman The Terrible Jun 26, 2015 at 11:41PM EDT

Share Pin Download More

Origin Entry: Supreme Court Gay Marriage Ruling

File type: png

Resolution: (640px x 661px)

File size: 214 KB


5 3.13 Gay marriage? No way. It's against nature. BIZARRO.COM facekeok.com/Bizarg iae
. In 2009, a man married a video game character . In 2007, a woman married the Eiffel Tower o In 2008, a man married a life- sized doll . Also in 2009, a woman married a roller coaster . And in 2005, a woman married a dolphin please explain to me why people still say that gays shouldnt be able to be married to preserve the sanctity of marraige Also please explain why this is not in chronological order it makes me very uncomfortable
by RUBEN BOLLING BuG THE TWO FISTSOF SUPREME JUSTICE UDGE SCALIA IS TRAVERSING THE LANDSCAPE, SEARCHING FOR HIPPIES TO HECTOR HIDGE SCALIAI JUDGE SCALIA! TEXTUAL || ORIGIMALISM WHERE IN BLAZES HELP! THE STATE COULD THOSE LONG- WON'T LET US HAIRS BE HIDING. MARRY! WHA,? THRILLS. CHILLS.... HE CONJURES THE ORIGINAL WHAT?NO SOONER IS THE JUDGE FRAMERS OF THE FOURTEENTH | 1 AMENDMENT H--- SEX.. WAIT, > BACK ON HIS WAY, WHEN... JUDGE SCALIA! CAMPAIGN CRYBABIES!I RULE ONLYASFNANCE LAWS WON'T LET スー JUST AS I THouGHT! YER OUTTA LUCkK THE CONSTITUTION WAS WRITENMY CORPORATION CONTRIBUTE TO POLITICIANS AS I'D LIKE! NERRE DID you INTEND TO INCLUDE HOMOSEXUAL MARRIAGE IN THE DUE PROCESS AND EQUAL PROTECTION CLAUSES? 乙 ER!! WHoND so, JUDGE SCALIA O,DRAFTERS OF THE FIRST AMENDMENT, DID You INTEND CARES WHAT You THOUGHT?ONCE AGAIN PROVES HIS FOR CORPORATIONS TO BE COV- I'LL RULE WHAT You ERED BY FREEDOM oF SPEECH?SHouLD HAVE THOUGHT!JUDICIAL INTERPRETATION, A CONSISTENT APPROACH TO REGARDLESS OF OUTCOME. WHAT? NO ONE DID! COR- PORATIONS BARELY EXISTED THIS PROTECTED HUMANS. / HUSH, HuSH, MY SWEET CORPORATION WERE YoUR FEEL- INGS HURT? INC C.
View All 93 Images

Load 9 Comments

More:

Top Comments

LesserAngel
Delete
Sensitive
LesserAngel

Ok, this? This I have a problem with. You can't complain about government buildings displaying one kind of symbol (confederate flag) and not even a week later be perfectly fine with a government building displaying another kind of symbol, just because you agree with one and not the other. That's some double standard hypocritical BS

+12
Reply

+ Add a Comment

Comments (9)


Display Comments

Add a Comment


+ Add an Image

Image Details

873 views (5 from today)

Uploaded Jun 26, 2015 at 11:41PM EDT

Origin Entry

Supreme Court Gay Marriage Ruling

Tags

white house, twitter, pride, gay, homosexuality, lbgt, lbgtq, glbt, lights, gay pride, executive branch, government

Claim Authorship Edit History
Textile Embed