Do you guys ever actually read beyond the talking point?
Did you even read your own source? Do you even know what those sources are?
The Lancet letter which is NOT peer reviewed claimed that " Applying a conservative estimate of four indirect deaths per one direct death to the 37 396 deaths reported, it is not implausible to estimate that up to 186 000 or even more deaths could be attributable to the current conflict in Gaza."
Read that again, comrade. "I N D I R E C T " deaths. They get this number from an analysis from 2008 Geneva Declaration specifically in chapter 2: "In the majority of conflicts since the early 1990s for which good data is available, the burden of indirect deaths was between three and 15 times the number of direct deaths."
The analysis also points highlights that there is no objective method to calculate indirect deaths, that the methodology is extremely complex and difficult to gather and can be and usually are something that can be measured through long term excessive deaths.
Holy hell you could have just looked this thing up on Snopes
which gives a fairly decent break down. And it's so funny to note that the authors themselves push back to the exact thing YOU and people like you are doing:
""Our Correspondence in The Lancet does not posit that almost 8% of Gaza's population had been wiped out since Oct. 7," Khatib (one of the authors) wrote via email to Snopes.
"Unfortunately, many people have chosen to take our figure as representing deaths that have already occurred, which is not what we say,"
It is so absolutely clear that all you do is throw out talking points and poorly thought out gochyas. You can't even maintain consistency. And the pro-Palestine side is full of this kind of retardation. This is why they don't give a shit about Palestinians as a people, it has always been about larping as revolutionaries, and using the Palestinians as a symbol for their revolutionary struggle against the West's hegemony. If they spent a 10nth of the energy they use for protesting actually doing a bit of research they'd find so many better ways of actually helping real change happen in this conflict.
Are you even self aware enough to see that the definition for evacuation goes against exactly what you wrote out Israel is doing? Thanks for reinforcing my position that it wasn't an ethnic cleansing but an evacuation. I guess not since you lack the reading comprehension to even read a 2 page Lancet letter, or what I wrote about my lack of empathy for a Hamas terrorist getting raped. ¯\(ツ)/¯