Forums / Fun! / Just For Fun

Emerson Grey wrote:

CrowTheMagician wrote:

Well this time I'm officially back and in no hurry to go any where.

But boy things turn out bad! I think only two things went out right. The first was lunch while the other is a bit more private, so I can't say it on the thread.

SmackerJack wrote:

Good. I wanted to ask if you like the core gameplay.

Emerson Grey wrote:

Well, it's fine. Kinda a stretch to memorize those button combos for specials, but I can manage with a little practice. I grew up with Smash Bros. I tried King of Fighters and Mortal Combat, and I kinda sucked at those, but that's because of the lack of button use in Smash Bros.

Emerson Grey wrote:

Well, it's fine. Kinda a stretch to memorize those button combos for specials, but I can manage with a little practice. I grew up with Smash Bros. I tried King of Fighters and Mortal Combat, and I kinda sucked at those, but that's because of the lack of button use in Smash Bros.

Emerson Grey wrote:

First time trying to play King of Fighters

SmackerJack wrote:

Lel. Which year did you play? That has bearing on the gameplay.

Emerson Grey wrote:

King of Fighters XIII. My friend downloaded it to his PS3, and that was the first one I've ever played.

SmackerJack wrote:

We're smart enough to figure out by ourselfs. Now. Have you seen the gameplay? I want to make sure everyone is okay with it.

CrowTheMagician wrote:

I have no problems with the decided gameplay… as long as their are tutorials for them.

CrowTheMagician wrote:

I have no problems with the decided gameplay… as long as their are tutorials for them.

SmackerJack wrote:

Calling for Pio-Pio! Calling for Pio-Pio!

Pio-Pio wrote:

I'm here, Captain!

SmackerJack wrote:

Is that the kind of tutorial you meant?

SmackerJack wrote:

Finally! I was beginning to get lonely and sad. Although, I wonder where everyone else is…Any who, we were just discussing a tutorial. I called you here because I needed more input. Thoughts?

Pio-Pio wrote:

Probably went to sleep, and such. Pesky thing, being human.

As for the tutorial, as a noob fighting gamer, I don't think it would be such a bad idea. If we could implement it into the game I see no problems. Though it probably would be just as good to be able to show the combo list in training mode.

CrowTheMagician wrote:

Yep, that's pretty much the one I was asking for.

Pio-Pio wrote:

Probably went to sleep, and such. Pesky thing, being human.

As for the tutorial, as a noob fighting gamer, I don't think it would be such a bad idea. If we could implement it into the game I see no problems. Though it probably would be just as good to be able to show the combo list in training mode.

SmackerJack wrote:

Good. Now, if possible, I want to go even deeper than SkullGirls. They explained a large amount of mechanics put into fighting games. But they didn't explain everything. Mind you, I don't want to go that deep. But I do want to cover a lot.

SmackerJack wrote:

Good. Now, if possible, I want to go even deeper than SkullGirls. They explained a large amount of mechanics put into fighting games. But they didn't explain everything. Mind you, I don't want to go that deep. But I do want to cover a lot.

Emerson Grey wrote:

Nah, I'm just kiddin'. We're fine.

Emerson Grey wrote:

Oh, I did some reading, and should we exclude the concept of wavedashing, so that way we don't attract any noob tactics?

CrowTheMagician wrote:

What parts do you want to cover exactly that skullgirls didn't?

CrowTheMagician wrote:

Wasn't wavedashing the results of a glitch? If this game ever becomes a reality and wavedashing some how manages to make an appearance then I'll probably laugh my ass off.

Kung Fu Cthulhu wrote:

Now for the Elephant in the room:

Who, exactly, is going to code this?

SmackerJack wrote:

Explanation? What do you mean by coding? We're all new to this.

Kung Fu Cthulhu wrote:

I mean to ask who the main programmer is going to be.

HolyCrapItsBob wrote:

So… Is there any reason to have a thread on the forums when other users aren't allowed to participate?

I mean, the whole point of a forum is user participation. To deny other people a voice goes against the very basis of a public forum.

Wouldn't this then be better if it was taken to a more private place meant for discussion? Something like Skype or something?

Kung Fu Cthulhu wrote:

I mean to ask who the main programmer is going to be.

HolyCrapItsBob wrote:

So… Is there any reason to have a thread on the forums when other users aren't allowed to participate?

I mean, the whole point of a forum is user participation. To deny other people a voice goes against the very basis of a public forum.

Wouldn't this then be better if it was taken to a more private place meant for discussion? Something like Skype or something?

SmackerJack wrote:

Oh shit! Did we do something wrong? I mean, I don't know if we can.

HolyCrapItsBob wrote:

So… Is there any reason to have a thread on the forums when other users aren't allowed to participate?

I mean, the whole point of a forum is user participation. To deny other people a voice goes against the very basis of a public forum.

Wouldn't this then be better if it was taken to a more private place meant for discussion? Something like Skype or something?

Cale wrote:

Declaring privacy is grounds for a permanent banning, as well as being reported to the NSA and UN.

Kung Fu Cthulhu wrote:

I think it's more to prevent "HEY GUYS CAN I BE IN THE GAME" posts. I think that the thread should be a little more open, but posts offering help would probably be more appreciated that ones that just serve to add more work to the project.

Emerson Grey wrote:

Then, we shall go to the IRC!

HolyCrapItsBob wrote:

Well, yeah. But all those begging posts can be answered with a simple 'Go fuck yourself'.

You're free to voice your opinion in the rudest and crassest of ways here. As I'm sure you'll find out if you haven't already.

I mean, isn't the general rule of participation that if you want to be in it, you've gotta contribute?

Emerson Grey wrote:

Then, we shall go to the IRC!

Philip J. Fry wrote:

What the fuck am I reading?

Only [list of people] are allowed in this thread. All others are not.

This is a public forum, fagtrons. You can't declare a thread to be private property.

Kung Fu Cthulhu wrote:

I think that might be a little much. Considering that a lot of this information needs to be put in a place where it can be easily re-accessed, I think a thread functions better as an archive than something that updates as quickly as an IRC page does. Though it might not be bad for making game-related decisions on what to include and whatnot.

Kung Fu Cthulhu wrote:

I think that might be a little much. Considering that a lot of this information needs to be put in a place where it can be easily re-accessed, I think a thread functions better as an archive than something that updates as quickly as an IRC page does. Though it might not be bad for making game-related decisions on what to include and whatnot.

Cale wrote:

Problem being that you all are posting too fast. Some of you seem to just be waiting for new posts here, which will push down other threads used by other users.

Might I recommend MeetingWords , which has a chat and a saved document shared among people on the page?

Which is also private and free?

SmackerJack wrote:

Well, yeah, but how could we recruit more people if it's private?