Forums / Maintenance / Suggest Ideas

6,927 total conversations in 573 threads

+ New Thread


Clarification on the NSFW rules on gore?

Last posted Jul 19, 2016 at 06:57AM EDT. Added Jul 19, 2016 at 02:04AM EDT
8 posts from 5 users

Warning: All image links contain very unpleasant gore.

The site's fairly detailed with sexual content, but gore is kinda a toss up. All I know is that allowed content is somewhere between the NC this and the plain NSFW this. Is it the guts in the first one? The bones? The details?

I guess I'm more or less curious because this image disturbed some redditors browsing the SU gallery seen in this thread and was later deleted for being gore. It just didn't seem like gore to me, but I guess it was. So yeah, I could use some clarification on that issue and possibly have those clarifications added to the rules?

Last edited Jul 19, 2016 at 02:15AM EDT

I think we mostly draw the line at if its the real thing or too detailed. The first example puts its gore at its main focus, which in turn makes it the most detailed part, while the Yang picture doesn't make it too detailed and thus it's ok. It also helps that it's not as realistic. The SU one's deletion IMO has less to do with it being considered gore and more to just being really shocking and nightmare fuely overall, although it is and is pretty detailed, and not to mention more extreme than the two examples provided.

Pretty much what Peacock Roy said.

Sorta mentioned here already but what is defined as Gore isn't super clear I guess.

Any IRL guts would likely fit into this (there are of course exceptions and presentation can make a difference. An IRL preserved brain in a jar = usually okay. Some IRL dude's brains smeared across the pavement= usually not okay).
Similarly, super detailed illustrated guts would usually fall under not okay. The SU image is disturbing but I'm hesitant to call it gore. I knew we had in the past some rules about shock imagery but that was more in the sense you can't break the rules just to "shock" some one IIRC.

I was the mod that removed the SU image.

My reasoning was a combination of the torn off limb, "detailed" gore (gonna leave detailed up for debate given that it's crayons), cannibalism (you can see Connie's glasses and some bone being all that's left), and the shock element.

If it was just Steven, I probs would've left it alone, but they just had to make him a cannibal.

Last edited Jul 19, 2016 at 04:17AM EDT

Thanks all. I think shock image is probably a fitting description given the nature of the show and gallery compared to the image content.

So maybe what needs clarification for me is shock content? While gore seems to be more or less bloody innards, shock intends to shock I guess? But does shock need to be specifically NSFW or is it pretty much the same as gore or what? It's one of those things where standard examples are obvious but others can get muddled for me.

I would estimate that over 98% of all the NSFW-tagged images on KYM are flagged as such for sexually suggestive or explicit content. While hiding sexy things isn't the only use of NSFW banners, it's what people come to expect. On KYM, "not safe work work" is basically synonymous with "pornographic," and there's not really much use in treating it as anything else.

While it's not an ideal system, it does it's job: users know and understand that the NSFW banner is hiding images in the grey zone between NC ("not cool") content, and regular images. There exists an understanding that the hidden content is not suitable for public viewing, but still follows site guidelines as listed in the NSFW guidelines.

The reason we can get away with this is because of how frequent the censoring of sexual material occurs. From the NSFW guidelines:

Images are OK as long as it’s something that can be seen on a Major Network Daytime TV or in PG-16 / Mature Games.


Our NSFW guidelines are just adapted from common television. It's easy enough to say "if the nipples/genitals are showing, it's NC, if they're doing sexy things it's NSFW". It's a lot more difficult to judge how much blood, dismemberment, or death is "too much" for the site. Adding to this issue, users that are expecting sexual content that would not offend them are instead finding other "triggering" content – most often gore (the RWBY gallery being a perfectly good example of this, judging by the complaints we received). Some users call for all gore to be NSFW'd, or removed entirely, while others would claim that illustrated or drawn blood and gore shouldn't be worthy of censorship.

When we use the same NSFW banners for "trigger tagging", we don't have the same easy out. Although we haven't had to face much of it (yet), scatalogical content, extreme fetishism, "snuff", vore, and extreme abuse, to name a few, are all considered worthy of being tagged for the express purpose of allowing people to avoid it. This is often where you'll here the phrase "not safe for life" thrown around, in reference to content that is shocking for reasons that AREN'T notably sexual. This is the crux of the issue: KYM currently has no way of separating content that is NSFW for sexual reasons from content that is NSFW for other, usually much more disturbing ones. The Stephen Universe example mentioned above illustrates this issue really well. How can a user differentiate between an NSFW image that will be sexy and an NSFW image that is literally designed to shock and horrify viewers?

While I'm not necessarily proposing any one system, I think there are a few ways we can take this:

  • Certain (read: hentai & doujin) websites simply mark certain genres of content as "triggering". Attempting to view this content brings the user to a landing page, warning that the following content is considered disturbing or unsettling by many. While not specific as to the content itself, it's effective in preventing users from running into images or videos they wouldn't wish to see.
  • Many of the safer Booru image hosts, use an almost identical system to ours, but with more options for filtering images. Filter tags with thumbnails exist for things like "suggestive", "18+", "spoilers", "seizure warning", and "questionable" all fit in here. It enables people to be very specific about the content they view and upload – provided it is tagged properly.
  • By and large the easiest solution, adding a third filter (maybe with another little KYM-tan thumbnail) for content which is considered worthy of being hidden, but not expressly for being lewd. Admittedly, it would require a bit of backtracking to re-tag some old images, but as a quick fix this would probably be enough to avoid users stumbling upon gore/shock imagery. Given the existence of shock content, such as goatse [NSFW] and meatspin [NSFW] it would be a useful thing to have. [1]

"But Doeoeod! What if I A user is okay with one filtered fetish, but not another? How will they find what they're looking for?"

Good question IRC hypothetical strawman! At the end of the day, KYM is not a fanart-hosting website, nor a fetish/pornography catalog. There's a reason "booru tagging" is considered a bad thing among media mods: KYM isn't made for people to find exactly the kind of fanart/softcore porn they want. The warning is just that: a warning. Actively seeking out that kind of content is better done on sites like the booru sites I keep mentioning, or places like Tumblr. [2]

Please note that this issue doesn't apply to real-life bloody or gory images. If those kinds of images are necessary for documentation, they are often placed behind specific spoiler tags or filters. The only instance of real-life blood or gore being acceptable on KnowYourMeme is for the documentation of events that specifically involve those deaths, such as disasters and (unfortunately quite common) attacks of terror. As far as I can tell, the issue of unmarked/ambiguous gore images on KYM only occurs with fanart/illustrated uploads.

(Also, if a mod or someone could go apologize to the folk over on the SU subreddit, that'd be nice.)

Last edited Jul 19, 2016 at 05:18AM EDT

And since I brought up the issue of what would essentially be overhauling KYM's image handling, I might as well throw these in:

While we're on the topic of KYM filtering system, the ability to control or enable/disable these at will would be pretty much a godsend to the entire site. I know for a fact most of the avid gallery-browsers click on every NSFW link they see. For users like these, as well as anyone trying to search a gallery via thumbnail, the NSFW filter is nothing but an obstruction. They also provide a challenge in cleaning galleries, as thumbnails are usually the easiest way to identify a reposted image, or image that needs to be removed. In the same manner as the "hide ponies" button, it would be pretty damn beneficial to enable users to toggle the appearance of NSFW, spoiler, and whatever hypothetical "shock" filter the site has.

This is possible the largest ongoing discussion about KYM's organization and tagging policy. While we're against "Booru tagging" in favour of KYM's primary role of documentation, nobody is going to deny that it gets the most use as a repository for fanart, especially of the sexy kind. While it's clean, simple, and easy to follow, it also makes sorting between images pretty much impossible. Two images of the same character, uploaded to the same gallery, would literally only require the tags "name, fanart, artist:name" to be in line with KYM's standards. As much as some of the mods dislike it, Boorus and similar hosts have much more detailed tagging systems than us.

Not exactly relevant to the topic at hand, but food for thought, I suppose.

Last edited Jul 19, 2016 at 05:16AM EDT

I like the idea of a third warning for mild shock/gore or an alternative warning. But yeah, it does bring up the issue of needing one in the first place and the prevalence of borderline porn in some galleries and the tagging system. It's definitely a whole different issue people have noticed for a while. I appreciate the comprehensive answer.

Skeletor-sm

This thread is closed to new posts.

Old threads normally auto-close after 30 days of inactivity.

Why don't you start a new thread instead?

Word Up! You must login or signup first!