Dragon Age The Veilguard cover example and reviews examples.

Dragon Age The Veilguard Reviews Controversy

Part of a series on Dragon Age: The Veilguard. [View Related Entries]

Updated Oct 29, 2024 at 06:37PM EDT by Zach.

Added Oct 29, 2024 at 02:06PM EDT by Mateus.

PROTIP: Press 'i' to view the image gallery, 'v' to view the video gallery, or 'r' to view a random entry.

This submission is currently being researched & evaluated!

You can help confirm this entry by contributing facts, media, and other evidence of notability and mutation.

Overview

Dragon Age The Veilguard Reviews Controversy refers to an online controversy in which video game developer BioWare and its publisher EA allegedly restricted review code copies for some gaming journalists and content creators who were purportedly more likely to be critical than others during their hands-on time with Dragon Age: The Veilguard, which releases on October 31st, 2024. The allegations became a viral topic on X / Twitter and other sites as the reviews of the RPG were largely positive from media outlets, with some praising the game as a whole, while others criticized various details of the story, writing, characters and gameplay mechanics. Additionally, some also targeted the writing and other aspects of the game they perceived as "woke" and "diversity, equity and inclusion" (DEI) content as the controversy unfolded in the days leading up to Veilguard's release.

Background

On October 25th, 2024, RPG content creator and X / Twitter user @WolfheartFPS[1] tweeted that he and two other creators, who also had received early hands-on access to play BioWare's Dragon Age: The Veilguard, were supposedly not given "a review code with time to actually give opinions before release." The tweet (seen below) amassed more than 527,000 views and 1,700 likes in four days.


WolfheartFPS @WolfheartFPS. Follow X 3 creators myself included, were a bit more critical than others with our hands-on time with Dragon Age: The Veilguard. Not a single one of us will be getting a review code with time to actually give opinions before release. Just thought I would throw that out there.... Show more 1:13 PM Oct 25, 2024

The creator also replied to a follower in the same post mentioning another gaming journalist who also purportedly didn't receive a review code, even though they had posted positive comments about the game. @WolfheartFPS wrote that "Some positive creators didn't get codes but ALL 'critical' creators (that I know of) did not." The post (seen below) received roughly 130 likes in four days.


Fantasy Files Podcast Oct 25, 2024 @FilesFantasy - Follow Replying to @WolfheartFPS X I'm totally with you, but Luke Stephens was very positive on the game and they didn't give him one either. WolfheartFPS @WolfheartFPS Follow That's not really that important to what I am saying here. SOME positive creators didn't get codes but ALL "critical" creators (that I know of) did not. 4:25 PM Oct 25, 2024

Developments

Dragon Age: The Veilguard Reviews

Reviews for Dragon Age: The Veilguard started to appear on October 28th, 2024, as IGN[2] reviewer Leana Hafer gave it a 9/10 score, writing, "If we never get another Dragon Age, at least it got to go out on a high note with Dragon Age: The Veilguard." The review video (seen below) amassed more than 298,000 views, 6,100 likes and 6,600 comments in a day. Using the Return YouTube Dislike extension in a browser, the YouTube video notably received more than 42,000 dislikes in the same timeframe, though the number is an estimate and not exact.



Additionally, under the comment section of IGN's YouTube[2] review for Veilguard, many of the top-voted comments from users criticized IGN and the review, as well as the game (examples seen below),


ISCO ST u R @Badhero4 22 hours ago There's a reason YouTube got rid of dislikes. 3.8K 62 replies Reply @RiasxGremory 22 hours ago I clicked on this video merely for the comment section. 3.2K 23 replies Reply @Funkeneh110 5 hours ago Aren't YouTube channels required to inform viewers when a video contains this much paid messaging. 501 5 replies Reply @unnero1 6 hours ago "Slick looping corridors with just enough little nooks to explore" is a nice way of saying this is linear AF lol. 423 7 replies Reply @robertoalex4245 1 day ago I only clicked on this because I was curious to see how much IGN was gonna lie to my face, not because I was curious about the game. 4.7K Reply

Skill Up's[7] Dragon Age: The Veilguard's review written by gaming journalist Austin B, titled "I do not recommend: 'Dragon Age: The Veilguard' (Review)," generated notable online buzz after it was published to their YouTube channel on October 28th (seen below), amassing over 1 million views, 68,000 likes and 19,000 comments in a day.



On the same day, the YouTube[9] channel of Fextralife posted a video justifying why they aren't doing a Dragon Age: The Veilguard review, alleging EA tried to manipulate review scores by favoring those who'd likely give a higher grade for the game. The video (seen below) also sourced other creators waiting for the review code, which amassed more than 511,000 views, 39,000 likes and 6,000 comments in a day.



As of October 29th, 2024, Dragon Age: The Veilguard holds a "Generally Favorable" 84/100 score on Metacritic[3] based on 51 critic reviews.

Online Reactions

Following the emergence of initial reviews in late October 2024, some netizens and fans of the franchise shared their lack of trust and suspicions related to the accuracy of the game's review from gaming journalists, with some also alleging the game is too "woke" and was written by "DEI" writers among those with complaints about non-political aspects of the RPG.

For example, on October 28th, 2024, X[4] user @BadGhostTv shared some screenshots from IGN's Dragon Age: The Veilguard's review video, writing that the game "is the most obvious virtue signal that any dei hacks could possibly force in to a game." The tweet (seen below) amassed roughly 310 likes and 20 reposts in a day.



On the same day, X[5] user @nib95_reminded people that LGBTQ+ dialogue has been present in other games of the franchise, as the user shared a clip from the 2014 Dragon Age Inquisition. The video (seen below) amassed more than 306,000 views and 3,300 likes in a day.


Redditors also commented on the reviews controversy surrounding DATV, as Redditor AboveSkies[6] made a post about Bloomberg Reporter Jason Schreier and other gaming journalists that were policing what other publications were allowed to say in their Dragon Age: The Veilguard review articles by purportedly editing their reviews following backlash. The post (seen below) amassed more than 550 upvotes and 80 comments in a day.


The Dualshockers Review of Dragon Age: The Veilguard apparently contained a passage that said: https://pbs.twimg.com/media/GbAkJJiW8AAcOtv.png It's a game that clearly has had a bit of the Sweet Baby Inc. treatment in spots when it comes to its character backgrounds and storytelling, and it's a game that is willing to offer fan service by giving old characters little cameo appearances but unwilling to truly cater to the wants and needs of long-serving Dragon Age fans. Yet despite all this, I still find myself weirdly enamored with this title because it's a very polished, satisfying, and enjoyable version of what it's trying to be. That may alienate Die-hard fans out there, but it seems that this is a new age for Dragon Age, and while it has its flaws, it's one that has started with a bang. We don't have an Original Archive of the review as far as I can tell, but we'll just take the word of Honest Schreier (Reporter at Bloomberg) here. Upon which he complained on Twitter about it, here is what he had to say: https://x.com/jasonschreier/status/1851031448993587232 https://archive.is/6Puci This, from a review on Metacritic (!), is truly unhinged - not just because of the dog-whistling, but because of the divine power that idiots keep ascribing to consultants. Hate to break it to you, folks, but the people making key decisions at game companies aren't on contract You can see various of his "colleagues" chiming in: https://xcancel.com/jasonschreier/status/1851031448993587232 Kotaku's Senior Reporter Ethan Gach pasted that bit from the review on his Twitter, stating: https://x.com/ethangach/status/1851007420971303114 https://archive.is/RLfHv This is utterly disqualifying He later added: https://x.com/ethangach/status/1851019285751267581 https://archive.is/fhuCn It's been stealth edited out This has apparently led to DualShockers changing their review, Stealth Editing and scrubbing references to "Sweet Baby Inc." and more, the entire paragraph now just reads: https://archive.is/HNBVE#selection-1865.1-1869.68 It seems that this is a new age for Dragon Age, and while it has its flaws, it's one that has started with a bang.

On October 29th, 2024, YouTuber[8] @EndymionTv uploaded a video alleging that Dragon Age: The Veilguard is a "Woke Disaster & The End of BioWare." The video (seen below) amassed roughly 38,000 views and 5,600 likes in a few hours.



Search Interest

External References

Recent Videos 1 total

Recent Images 20 total


Top Comments

HumbleWaterFilterMerchant
HumbleWaterFilterMerchant

The top surgery scars thing gets me. I have the same issue as the wheelchair adventurer in DND. Its a high fantasy setting where magic and divine magic flow like water yet somehow you opted into the most dangerous strength intensive professions and somehow haven't run into a cleric who could cure your paraplegia? Similar sort of idea with top surgery scars, with transformation/transmogrify magic existing and wizards and clerics outnumbering the men and women of science by such a wide margin why would you not simply magically change your sex instead opting for invasive surgery that is harder to find/seek out. I understand that its ultimately up to the player but its a bit lore breaking. I can't say I'm familiar with the lore of dragon age but I'm assuming its similar to DND.

+51

+ Add a Comment

Comments (252)


Display Comments

Add a Comment


Hello! You must login or signup first!