Reading the Mind in the Eyes Test (RMET) - Images

Sorted By:

it’s official, i’m coining “facecel” and “face rotator”

* jimmy @202accepted it's official, i'm coining "facecel" and "face rotator" jimmy @202accepted - 11h did i gain or lose the mandate of heaven? x.com/paulg/status/1... Reading the Mind in the Eyes Test Your Score: 36/36 Understanding Your Score The average score for this test is in the range of 22 to 30 correct responses. If you scored above 30, you may be quite good at understanding someone's mental state based on facial cues. If you scored below 22, you may find it difficult to understand a person's mental state based on their facial expressions. 8:19 PM Apr 23, 2024 2,058 Views
* jimmy @202accepted it's official, i'm coining "facecel" and "face rotator" jimmy @202accepted - 11h did i gain or lose the mandate of heaven? x.com/paulg/status/1... Reading the Mind in the Eyes Test Your Score: 36/36 Understanding Your Score The average score for this test is in the range of 22 to 30 correct responses. If you scored above 30, you may be quite good at understanding someone's mental state based on facial cues. If you scored below 22, you may find it difficult to understand a person's mental state based on their facial expressions. 8:19 PM Apr 23, 2024 2,058 Views

Reading the Mind in the Eyes Test (RMET)
rmet reading the mind in the eyes eyes test emotional intelligence social intelligence neurodivergency neurotypicality wordcel shape rotator

oops

oops Imp in DC/NY (Apr 6 - 15) @imperialauditor Grateful Flirtatious ✓ Correct × Incorrect Hostile Disappointed Paul Graham @paulg. 14h I got 25/36 on this facial expression reading test. I was curious how Jessica would do, so I sent it to her. She got 36/36. She really is the social radar. (via @markessien) s3.amazonaws.com/he-assets-prod... • 9:17 PM Apr 23, 2024 · 4,580 Views
oops Imp in DC/NY (Apr 6 - 15) @imperialauditor Grateful Flirtatious ✓ Correct × Incorrect Hostile Disappointed Paul Graham @paulg. 14h I got 25/36 on this facial expression reading test. I was curious how Jessica would do, so I sent it to her. She got 36/36. She really is the social radar. (via @markessien) s3.amazonaws.com/he-assets-prod... • 9:17 PM Apr 23, 2024 · 4,580 Views

Reading the Mind in the Eyes Test (RMET)
rmet reading the mind in the eyes eyes test emotional intelligence social intelligence neurodivergency neurotypicality

I'm at a complete loss on this one

Which word best describes what the person in the picture is thinking and feeling? Irritated Thoughtful Encouraging Sympathetic
Which word best describes what the person in the picture is thinking and feeling? Irritated Thoughtful Encouraging Sympathetic

Reading the Mind in the Eyes Test (RMET)
rmet reading the mind in the eyes eyes test emotional intelligence social intelligence neurodivergency neurotypicality mariko shogun

This explains so much of my life

Armand Domalewski @ArmandDoma This explains so much of my life Reading the Mind in the Eyes Test Which word best describes what the person in the picture is thinking and feeling? 30/36 Grateful Flirtatious Hostile Disappointed × Incorrect 8:00 PM Apr 23, 2024 103.8K Views
Armand Domalewski @ArmandDoma This explains so much of my life Reading the Mind in the Eyes Test Which word best describes what the person in the picture is thinking and feeling? 30/36 Grateful Flirtatious Hostile Disappointed × Incorrect 8:00 PM Apr 23, 2024 103.8K Views

Reading the Mind in the Eyes Test (RMET)
rmet reading the mind in the eyes eyes test emotional intelligence social intelligence neurodivergency neurotypicality

ok guys time for all of us to mask off

eigenrobot @eigenrobot ok guys time for all of us to mask off Your Score: 34/36 Understanding Your Score The average score for this test is in the range of 22 to 30 correct responses. If you scored above 30, you may be quite good at understanding someone's mental state based on facial cues. If you scored below 22, you may find it difficult to understand a person's mental state based on their facial expressions. Overeducated Gibbon @MostlyMonkey • 13h Replying to @MostlyMonkey s3.amazonaws.com/he-assets-prod... 6:13 PM Apr 23, 2024 89.1K Views
eigenrobot @eigenrobot ok guys time for all of us to mask off Your Score: 34/36 Understanding Your Score The average score for this test is in the range of 22 to 30 correct responses. If you scored above 30, you may be quite good at understanding someone's mental state based on facial cues. If you scored below 22, you may find it difficult to understand a person's mental state based on their facial expressions. Overeducated Gibbon @MostlyMonkey • 13h Replying to @MostlyMonkey s3.amazonaws.com/he-assets-prod... 6:13 PM Apr 23, 2024 89.1K Views

Reading the Mind in the Eyes Test (RMET)
rmet reading the mind in the eyes eyes test emotional intelligence social intelligence neurodivergency neurotypicality mask off

beat the autism allegations

typec (new acct) @typeclonghouse beat the autism allegations Reading the Mind in the Eyes Test Your Score: 31/36 Understanding Your Score The average score for this test is in the range of 22 to 30 correct responses. If you scored above 30, you may be quite good at understanding someone's mental state based on facial cues. If you scored below 22, you may find it difficult to understand a person's mental state based on their facial expressions.
typec (new acct) @typeclonghouse beat the autism allegations Reading the Mind in the Eyes Test Your Score: 31/36 Understanding Your Score The average score for this test is in the range of 22 to 30 correct responses. If you scored above 30, you may be quite good at understanding someone's mental state based on facial cues. If you scored below 22, you may find it difficult to understand a person's mental state based on their facial expressions.

Reading the Mind in the Eyes Test (RMET)
rmet reading the mind in the eyes eyes test emotional intelligence social intelligence neurodivergency neurotypicality

I'm never beating the "neurotypical" allegations.

Overeducated Gibbon @MostlyMonkey I'm never beating the "neurotypical" allegations. Your Score: 30/36 Understanding Your Score The average score for this test is in the range of 22 to 30 correct responses. If you scored above 30, you may be quite good at understanding someone's mental state based on facial cues. If you scored below 22, you may find it difficult to understand a person's mental state based on their facial expressions. 5:48 PM - Apr 23, 2024 30.9K Views
Overeducated Gibbon @MostlyMonkey I'm never beating the "neurotypical" allegations. Your Score: 30/36 Understanding Your Score The average score for this test is in the range of 22 to 30 correct responses. If you scored above 30, you may be quite good at understanding someone's mental state based on facial cues. If you scored below 22, you may find it difficult to understand a person's mental state based on their facial expressions. 5:48 PM - Apr 23, 2024 30.9K Views

Reading the Mind in the Eyes Test (RMET)
rmet reading the mind in the eyes eyes test emotional intelligence social intelligence neurodivergency neurotypicality

i thinks she's reflecting on how irritated she is

p3shoemaker.000 @p3shoemaker i thinks she's reflecting on how irritated she is Which word best describes what the person in the picture is thinking and feeling? 29/36 Impatient Aghast Incorrect Irritated Reflective ✓ Correct Next Question 7:51 PM Apr 23, 2024 43.2K Views
p3shoemaker.000 @p3shoemaker i thinks she's reflecting on how irritated she is Which word best describes what the person in the picture is thinking and feeling? 29/36 Impatient Aghast Incorrect Irritated Reflective ✓ Correct Next Question 7:51 PM Apr 23, 2024 43.2K Views

Reading the Mind in the Eyes Test (RMET)
rmet reading the mind in the eyes eyes test emotional intelligence social intelligence neurodivergency neurotypicality

for all of the female ones i just asked myself “what would a guy think she’s thinking” and ended up being right every time

"paula" @paularambles for all of the female ones i just asked myself "what would a guy think she's thinking" and ended up being right every time Done 11:14 1 s3.amazonaws.com Reading the Mind in the Eyes Test Your Score: 36/36 AA Ć Understanding Your Score The average score for this test is in the range of 22 to 30 correct responses. If you scored above 30, you may be quite good at understanding someone's mental state based on facial cues. If you scored below 22, you may find it difficult to understand a person's mental state based on their facial expressions. Paul Graham @paulg. 14h I got 25/36 on this facial expression reading test. I was curious how Jessica would do, so I sent it to her. She got 36/36. She really is the social radar. (via @markessien) s3.amazonaws.com/he-assets-prod... 5:21 PM - Apr 23, 2024 227.3K Views
"paula" @paularambles for all of the female ones i just asked myself "what would a guy think she's thinking" and ended up being right every time Done 11:14 1 s3.amazonaws.com Reading the Mind in the Eyes Test Your Score: 36/36 AA Ć Understanding Your Score The average score for this test is in the range of 22 to 30 correct responses. If you scored above 30, you may be quite good at understanding someone's mental state based on facial cues. If you scored below 22, you may find it difficult to understand a person's mental state based on their facial expressions. Paul Graham @paulg. 14h I got 25/36 on this facial expression reading test. I was curious how Jessica would do, so I sent it to her. She got 36/36. She really is the social radar. (via @markessien) s3.amazonaws.com/he-assets-prod... 5:21 PM - Apr 23, 2024 227.3K Views

Reading the Mind in the Eyes Test (RMET)
rmet reading the mind in the eyes eyes test emotional intelligence social intelligence neurodivergency neurotypicality

I got 25/36 on this facial expression reading test.

Paul Graham @paulg I got 25/36 on this facial expression reading test. I was curious how Jessica would do, so I sent it to her. She got 36/36. She really is the social radar. (via @markessien) s3.amazonaws.com/he-assets-prod... • 4:52 PM Apr 23, 2024 1.3M Views
Paul Graham @paulg I got 25/36 on this facial expression reading test. I was curious how Jessica would do, so I sent it to her. She got 36/36. She really is the social radar. (via @markessien) s3.amazonaws.com/he-assets-prod... • 4:52 PM Apr 23, 2024 1.3M Views

Reading the Mind in the Eyes Test (RMET)
rmet reading the mind in the eyes eyes test emotional intelligence social intelligence neurodivergency neurotypicality

This is a really important paper. I don't know what the RMET (Reading the Mind in the Eyes Test) measures, and neither does anyone else.

Abigail Marsh @aa_marsh ... This is a really important paper. I don't know what the RMET (Reading the Mind in the Eyes Test) measures, and neither does anyone else. There is very little evidence for its validity as a measure of "empathy" or other constructs it's purported to measure. sciencedirect.com/science/articl... Abstract The Reading the Mind in the Eyes Test (RMET) is one of the most influential measures of social cognitive ability, and it has been used extensively in clinical populations. However, questions have been raised about the validity of RMET scores. We conducted a systematic scoping review of the validity evidence reported in studies that administered the RMET (n=1461; of which 804 included at least one clinical sample) with a focus on six key dimensions: internal consistency, test-retest reliability, factor structure, convergent validity, discriminant validity, and known group validity. Strikingly, 63% of these studies failed to provide validity evidence from any of these six categories. Moreover, when evidence was reported, it frequently failed to meet widely accepted validity standards. Overall, our results suggest a troubling conclusion: the validity of RMET scores (and the research findings based on them) are largely unsubstantiated and uninterpretable. More broadly, this project demonstrates how unaddressed measurement issues can undermine a voluminous psychological literature. Keywords Validity; Reading the mind in the eyes test; Measurement; Construct validation; Social cognition 1:42 PM Dec 28, 2023 80.4K Views
Abigail Marsh @aa_marsh ... This is a really important paper. I don't know what the RMET (Reading the Mind in the Eyes Test) measures, and neither does anyone else. There is very little evidence for its validity as a measure of "empathy" or other constructs it's purported to measure. sciencedirect.com/science/articl... Abstract The Reading the Mind in the Eyes Test (RMET) is one of the most influential measures of social cognitive ability, and it has been used extensively in clinical populations. However, questions have been raised about the validity of RMET scores. We conducted a systematic scoping review of the validity evidence reported in studies that administered the RMET (n=1461; of which 804 included at least one clinical sample) with a focus on six key dimensions: internal consistency, test-retest reliability, factor structure, convergent validity, discriminant validity, and known group validity. Strikingly, 63% of these studies failed to provide validity evidence from any of these six categories. Moreover, when evidence was reported, it frequently failed to meet widely accepted validity standards. Overall, our results suggest a troubling conclusion: the validity of RMET scores (and the research findings based on them) are largely unsubstantiated and uninterpretable. More broadly, this project demonstrates how unaddressed measurement issues can undermine a voluminous psychological literature. Keywords Validity; Reading the mind in the eyes test; Measurement; Construct validation; Social cognition 1:42 PM Dec 28, 2023 80.4K Views

Reading the Mind in the Eyes Test (RMET)
rmet reading the mind in the eyes eyes test emotional intelligence social intelligence neurodivergency neurotypicality

The "Reading the Mind in the Eyes" test, a social cognition test highly regarded in the academic community, is not worth the paper it is printed on.

Rolf Degen @DegenRolf The "Reading the Mind in the Eyes" test, a social cognition test highly regarded in the academic community, is not worth the paper it is printed on. sciencedirect.com/science/articl... ... The Reading the Mind in the Eyes Test (RMET) is one of the most influential measures of social cognitive ability, and it has been used extensively in clinical populations. However, questions have been raised about the validity of RMET scores. We conducted a systematic scoping review of the validity evidence. Most studies reported little to no validity evidence for RMET test scores. Moreover, when evidence was reported, it frequently failed to meet widely accepted validity standards. Overall, our results suggest a troubling conclusion: the validity of RMET scores (and the research findings based on them) are largely unsubstantiated and uninterpretable. These findings demonstrate that even a very widely used measure can lack validity evidence. Given the findings of this review, we strongly advise against the ongoing use of the RMET as a measure of social cognitive ability. 3:32 AM Dec 28, 2023 31.9K Views
Rolf Degen @DegenRolf The "Reading the Mind in the Eyes" test, a social cognition test highly regarded in the academic community, is not worth the paper it is printed on. sciencedirect.com/science/articl... ... The Reading the Mind in the Eyes Test (RMET) is one of the most influential measures of social cognitive ability, and it has been used extensively in clinical populations. However, questions have been raised about the validity of RMET scores. We conducted a systematic scoping review of the validity evidence. Most studies reported little to no validity evidence for RMET test scores. Moreover, when evidence was reported, it frequently failed to meet widely accepted validity standards. Overall, our results suggest a troubling conclusion: the validity of RMET scores (and the research findings based on them) are largely unsubstantiated and uninterpretable. These findings demonstrate that even a very widely used measure can lack validity evidence. Given the findings of this review, we strongly advise against the ongoing use of the RMET as a measure of social cognitive ability. 3:32 AM Dec 28, 2023 31.9K Views

Reading the Mind in the Eyes Test (RMET)
rmet reading the mind in the eyes eyes test emotional intelligence social intelligence neurodivergency neurotypicality

Are higher IQ people better at "reading the room"?

Joseph Bronski @BronskiJoseph Are higher IQ people better at "reading the room"? The answer appears to be yes. There is a moderate correlation between IQ and the "reading the mind in the eyes" test, where participants guess someone's mood based on a close-up of their eyes. Eye reading (theory of mind) N -2 IQ and Reading Mood from Eyes r=0.24 3- Baker et al. (2014). Eyes and IQ: A meta-analysis of the relationship between intelligence and "Reading the Mind in the Eyes" -3 60 80 100 120 IQ 8:39 AM Nov 18, 2023 · 42.9K Views 140
Joseph Bronski @BronskiJoseph Are higher IQ people better at "reading the room"? The answer appears to be yes. There is a moderate correlation between IQ and the "reading the mind in the eyes" test, where participants guess someone's mood based on a close-up of their eyes. Eye reading (theory of mind) N -2 IQ and Reading Mood from Eyes r=0.24 3- Baker et al. (2014). Eyes and IQ: A meta-analysis of the relationship between intelligence and "Reading the Mind in the Eyes" -3 60 80 100 120 IQ 8:39 AM Nov 18, 2023 · 42.9K Views 140

Reading the Mind in the Eyes Test (RMET)
rmet reading the mind in the eyes eyes test emotional intelligence social intelligence neurodivergency neurotypicality iq

RMET Test Example #2

PLAYFUL COMFORTING IRRITATED TERRIFIED BORED UPSET ARROGANT JOKING ANNOYED FLUSTERED DESIRE CONVINCED
PLAYFUL COMFORTING IRRITATED TERRIFIED BORED UPSET ARROGANT JOKING ANNOYED FLUSTERED DESIRE CONVINCED

Reading the Mind in the Eyes Test (RMET)
rmet reading the mind in the eyes eyes test emotional intelligence social intelligence neurodivergency neurotypicality

RMET Test Example #1

joking insisting irritated thoughtful amused relaxed encouraging sympathetic jealous panicked sarcastic arrogant stern hateful suspicious dispirited
joking insisting irritated thoughtful amused relaxed encouraging sympathetic jealous panicked sarcastic arrogant stern hateful suspicious dispirited

Reading the Mind in the Eyes Test (RMET)
rmet reading the mind in the eyes eyes test emotional intelligence social intelligence neurodivergency neurotypicality