Anonymous 18 hours ago ID: 252cb5 No.6040281 2804045004087 >>6036764 Holy f---, so many big people responding to james, f------, rolfe Never has the leftist bandwagoning brainwashing b------- been more apparent. Literally no peasant on earth can speak against them wlo a groupthink dogpile This is a dude famous for doing comedic reviews of old ass videogames, it's like the f------ twilight zone or something Anonymous 18 hours ago ID: 8af59f No. 60406872-8040789 >-8040778 >-8040789 >>6040281 I can't quite figure out why AVGN has been singled out for this particularly salty reaction from these supposedly famous and important people. There have been hundreds of videos and blogs panning this s----- movie trailer, for a variety of reasons, that were largely ignored by the outrage-aholics Anonymous 18 hours ago ID: fd4e5b No.6040789 6041403 >6040687 (Reposting this from /tv/) Man, how many of these people are being paid off by Sony? There's been countless articles, all blasting him; There's been all kinds of people from in Hollywood, insulting him on twitter. Look at how all these people are just telling bold faced lies about what he says. Painting him as some raving madman who literally pulls out a woman and starts r----- her halfway through the video. They want to dissuade people from watching the video and make everyone think he's just telling women to get back in the kitchen for 6 minutes Why? He's just some nerd on youtube who said he's not going to see it. There's been tons of people who made videos like that. Why are they all attacking him? The movie and TV industry hates youtube and other internet based entertainment because it cuts into their profits. This is why studios have been buying up Youtube networks. Disney owns a few of them and has people like Jontron in their pocket. James doesn't belong to a network though, he's completely self made and independent and most likely wouldn't sell off Cinemassacre. He also has over two million youtube subscribers, and they're just the audience that Sony wants to see Ghostbusters. So here you have over two million people who could watch this video and go "Yeah, maybe it's not worth it. I think I'll skip this movie." That right there has huge potential to dig a large chunk out of Ghostbusters' earnings. He's a voice with a sizeable reach who they can't control, and that scares the s--- out of them If you can't control someone, what do you do? You try and silence them, which is exactly what we're witnessing right now Notice these articles all say something along the lines of "You're just going to watch it anyways." They're trying to shame people into not thinking, just blindly consuming Anonymous 23 hours ago ID: 9ff62c No. 60369982-8038087 >>6038390 >26039478 >>6039764 >>6039785 File (hide): 1463609702126.ipg (18.74 KB, 211x241, 211:241, woofthe f--- ipg) 2> GameJournoPros much There is a mailing list for journalists' which has proclaimed that the new Ghostbusters film is not to be subject to criticism. I guarantee it >shoehorn garbage ideology into pop culture >surpri sed when everyone says it's s--- Anonymous 19 hours ago ID: 0877fd No.6039764 6040397 26040424 2> >shoehorn garbage ideology into pop culture >surpri Quite the opposite, they're not surprised at all. As you can see by their coordinated shilling effort, they were well prepared and had their SJW shock troops on stand by. They even sent out the same coordinated attack line "Star Trek V something 90% o people wouldn't pick up on or come up with naturally as a re erence or why it should be a re erence, yet nearly every comment from prominent personalities ust happened to use this obscure line of attack. They were completely prepared for backlash, they WERENT prepared to lose. Usually their wave of shock troops is enough to pacify any dissent and shame them into submission sed when everyone says it's s--- Anonymous 18 hours ago ID: 38b800 No. 60404242-8040448 >>6040482 226040520 >6039764 Also they're using the words 'man-baby' and 'man-child' a lot. James was calm, he wasn't sperging or yelling or acting in a childish manner in that video

Share Pin Download More

Origin Entry: "No Review, I Refuse"

File type: png

Resolution: (1522px x 1128px)

File size: 233 KB

An (assumably) updated version of a masterpost detailing all of the MSM's---- pieces on James. Came across this version on /tv/ a few days ago.

But it refused.

View Same Google iqdb 1463206849389.jpg. 41KiB,512x384 SauceNA。 Anonymous Fri 20 May 2016 21:18:17 No.338325360 Report Quoted By: >>338325470>>338325494 >>338325497 >>338325527 >>338325534 >338325650 >>338325814>>338325907 >>338325936 >>338326043 >338326097 >338326218 >>338326236 >>338326240 >>338326558>>338328772 >>338328879 So let me see if I have this straight new ghostbusters trailer comes out, main characters are now women AVGN doesn't think the movie will be good, says he won't review it >people start bitching about how you can't say it's a bad movie if you haven't even seen it yet real reason for them bitching is because feminists think he doesn't want to see it because the main characters are women, and that he's sexist

View All 24 Images

Load 4 Comments

More:

+50

"No Review, I Refuse" - Always remember that the cronyism revealed by Gamergate never disappeared, merely hid itself

PROTIP: Press the ← and → keys to navigate the gallery, 'g' to view the gallery, or 'r' to view a random image.

Anonymous 18 hours ago ID: 252cb5 No.6040281 2804045004087 >>6036764 Holy f---, so many big people responding to james, f------, rolfe Never has the leftist bandwagoning brainwashing b------- been more apparent. Literally no peasant on earth can speak against them wlo a groupthink dogpile This is a dude famous for doing comedic reviews of old ass videogames, it's like the f------ twilight zone or something Anonymous 18 hours ago ID: 8af59f No. 60406872-8040789 >-8040778 >-8040789 >>6040281 I can't quite figure out why AVGN has been singled out for this particularly salty reaction from these supposedly famous and important people. There have been hundreds of videos and blogs panning this s----- movie trailer, for a variety of reasons, that were largely ignored by the outrage-aholics Anonymous 18 hours ago ID: fd4e5b No.6040789 6041403 >6040687 (Reposting this from /tv/) Man, how many of these people are being paid off by Sony? There's been countless articles, all blasting him; There's been all kinds of people from in Hollywood, insulting him on twitter. Look at how all these people are just telling bold faced lies about what he says. Painting him as some raving madman who literally pulls out a woman and starts r----- her halfway through the video. They want to dissuade people from watching the video and make everyone think he's just telling women to get back in the kitchen for 6 minutes Why? He's just some nerd on youtube who said he's not going to see it. There's been tons of people who made videos like that. Why are they all attacking him? The movie and TV industry hates youtube and other internet based entertainment because it cuts into their profits. This is why studios have been buying up Youtube networks. Disney owns a few of them and has people like Jontron in their pocket. James doesn't belong to a network though, he's completely self made and independent and most likely wouldn't sell off Cinemassacre. He also has over two million youtube subscribers, and they're just the audience that Sony wants to see Ghostbusters. So here you have over two million people who could watch this video and go "Yeah, maybe it's not worth it. I think I'll skip this movie." That right there has huge potential to dig a large chunk out of Ghostbusters' earnings. He's a voice with a sizeable reach who they can't control, and that scares the s--- out of them If you can't control someone, what do you do? You try and silence them, which is exactly what we're witnessing right now Notice these articles all say something along the lines of "You're just going to watch it anyways." They're trying to shame people into not thinking, just blindly consuming Anonymous 23 hours ago ID: 9ff62c No. 60369982-8038087 >>6038390 >26039478 >>6039764 >>6039785 File (hide): 1463609702126.ipg (18.74 KB, 211x241, 211:241, woofthe f--- ipg) 2> GameJournoPros much There is a mailing list for journalists' which has proclaimed that the new Ghostbusters film is not to be subject to criticism. I guarantee it >shoehorn garbage ideology into pop culture >surpri sed when everyone says it's s--- Anonymous 19 hours ago ID: 0877fd No.6039764 6040397 26040424 2> >shoehorn garbage ideology into pop culture >surpri Quite the opposite, they're not surprised at all. As you can see by their coordinated shilling effort, they were well prepared and had their SJW shock troops on stand by. They even sent out the same coordinated attack line "Star Trek V something 90% o people wouldn't pick up on or come up with naturally as a re erence or why it should be a re erence, yet nearly every comment from prominent personalities ust happened to use this obscure line of attack. They were completely prepared for backlash, they WERENT prepared to lose. Usually their wave of shock troops is enough to pacify any dissent and shame them into submission sed when everyone says it's s--- Anonymous 18 hours ago ID: 38b800 No. 60404242-8040448 >>6040482 226040520 >6039764 Also they're using the words 'man-baby' and 'man-child' a lot. James was calm, he wasn't sperging or yelling or acting in a childish manner in that video

View Gallery Random Image

+ Add a Comment

Comments (4)

Display Comments