-
'Accidentally Became Important At Work' Becomes Viral Catchphrase Meme On Twitter -
Reviewbrah's First Video Was Shared On This Day, Marking 14 Long Years Of 'TheReportOfTheWeek' -
This Awkward Photo Of Christopher Walken Looks Like He's Waiting To Hear Back From You -
An Intriguing Sentence Spoken By 'Minecraft' YouTuber 'Kwebbelkop's AI Is Going Viral -
Cringe 'Honestly I Think They Not Like Us' Copypasta Was Seemingly Posted Ironically But History Is Omitting That
-1
He was born for this | /r/beetlejuicing/
Uploaded by Reddit Moments May 28, 2021 at 10:29AM EDT
reddit beetlejuicing names /r/beetlejuicing beetlejuice memes font
Origin Entry: Beetlejuicing
File type: jpg
Resolution: (1080px x 2400px)
File size: 173 KB
More:
-1
Beetlejuicing - He was born for this | /r/beetlejuicing/
| ◄ Previous | View Gallery Random Image | Next ► |
![3 111 B/s 58% AndrewCater 2719 pts • 5h Were the respondents asked or measured? 15:24 Porphyryo 853 pts • 4h Papers and studies with self-reported measurements were excluded from this study. KnowsPenisesWell • [SCORE HIDDEN] • 42m That's what they claim, but that's not what they did. It's a surprise this even managed to get past peer review. They claim that they exclude self-reported studies, but there's several self-reported studies in their dataset, like Herbenick or Di Mauro. They did not even account correctly for different measurement techniques. In the past studies were more commonly done Non-Bone-Pressed (measuring from the skin junction), but modern studies are typically done Bone-Pressed (pushing the ruler into the fat pad). For example for the 90s they used the 5.1" NBP average of Wessels et al 1996, but the 6.2" BP average it reported is in line with recent studies. They claim that they only use NBP studies, but especially in the recent studies most were done BP. So the average penis size didn't necessarily change significantly. The way we measure penises in studies did. Some other examples of their sloppy work is that in Table 1 they spelt it "measurament" and they cited the wrong Spyropoulos study. Their citation links to the unrelated 2005 Spyropouls study, but not the 2002 Spyropoulos which actually did measure penis size.](https://i.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/list/002/534/685/d0d.jpg "You could say he knows what he's talking about. | /r/beetlejuicing/")
Comments (0)
Add a Comment
Image Details
92 views (1 from today)
Uploaded May 28, 2021 at 10:29AM EDT
Origin Entry
Source
About the Uploader
Reddit Moments
Treasurer & Media Maid
There are no comments currently available.
Display Comments