'lo! You must login or signup first!

Entra /Registrati Pagina di servizio Discussione Leggi Visualizza sorgente Visualizza cronologia Ricerca Dear reader, WIKIPEDIA at this time, the Italian language Wikipedia may be no longer able to continue providing the service that over the years was useful to you, and that you expected to have right now. As things stand, the page you want still exists and is only hidden, but the risk is that soon we will be forced to actually delete it enciclopedia libera Pagina principale Ultime modifiche Una voce a caso Vetrina Over the past ten years, Wikipedia has become part of the daily habits of millions of web users looking for a neutral free-content, and - above all - independent source of Knowledge. A new, huge multi-lingual encyclopedia, freely available to all, at any time, and free of charge Today, unfortunately, the very pillars on which Wikipedia has been built neutrality, freedom, and verifiability of its contents - are likely to be heavily compromised by paragraph 29 of a law proposal, also known as "DDL intercettazioni" (Wiretapping Act) This proposal, which the Italian Parliament is currently debating, provides, among other things, a requirement to all websites to publish, within 48 hours of the request and without any comment, a correction of any content that the applicant deems detrimental to his/her image Unfortunately, the law does not require an evaluation of the claim by an impartial third judge - the opinion of the person allegedly injured is all that is required, in order to impose such correction to any website Hence, anyone who feels offended by any content published on a blog, an online newspaper and, most likely even on Wikipedia can directly request the removal of such contents and its permanent replacement with a "corrected" version, aimed to contr The Bill -Rules on Wiretapping etc. 9, p.24 letter a) states that: «For the Internet sites, including newspapers and periodicals delivered by telematic way the statements or corrections are published with the same graphic characteristics, the same access methodology to the site and the same visibility of the news which they refer.» ▼ Comunità Portale Comunità Il Wikipediano Fai una donazione Contatti Stampa/espor Strumenti ess of the information deemed as offensive, and its sources During all these years, the users of Wikipedia (and we want once more, to point out that Wikipedia does not have an editorial staff) have always been available to review - and modify, if needed - any content deemed to be detrimental to anyone, without harm to the Project's neutrality and independence. In the very rare instances it was not possible to reach a mutually satisfactory solution, the entire page has been removed Universal Declaration of Human Rights Article 27 (1) Everyone has the right freely to participate in the cultural life of the community, to enjoy the arts and to share in scientific advancement and its benefits (2) Everyone has the right to the protection of the moral and material interests resulting rom production of which he is the author. The obligation to publish on our site the correction as is provided by th amed paragraph 29, without SCI erary or artistic the freedom and independence of Wikipedia, to the point of distorting the principles on which the Free Encyclopedia is based and this would bring to a paralysis of the "horizontal" method of access and editing, putting - in fact - an end to its existence as we have known until today we w rs tion. Under such provisions, web users bably led to cease dealing with certain topics or people, just to "avoid troubles" We want to be able to keep a free and open-to-all encyclopa edia, because our articles are als rs

+1

Image #216,565


Uploaded by Brad Dec 13, 2011 at 12:57PM EST

Share Pin Download More

Origin Entry: Protect IP Act / Stop Online Piracy Act (PIPA / SOPA)

File type: png

Resolution: (1007px x 1155px)

File size: 259 KB


!https://i.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/original/000/830/030/5f6.gif! https://chadrocco.deviantart.com/art/SOPA-I-CAN-T-HEAR-YOU-278226179
[Discussion]Are SJWs an end-run around the failure of SOPA? iself.KotakulnAction) submitted 11 minutes ago by Aurondarklord So l've been thinking about this a lot lately...SJWs are definitely not a new thing, but until a couple years ago, they were never a BIG thing, they had their little hugboxes, and occasionally you'd run into some hypersensitive crusader in the wild, but they were mostly an irrelevant joke and certainly not capable of intimidating companies or forcing change. And then, very suddenly, they began gaining rapid steam, boosted by incredibly biased media coverage selling the world moral panic about all of their pet causes We know, from leaked documents, that the major media companies are determined to succeed where SOPA and PIPA failed, and that a major part of their strategy to ultimately implement site blocking is to find a way to shift the overton window, change culture so that people become okay with the idea. Atheism+ was coined in 2012, Anita Sarkeesian's kickstarter was in 2012, I would call these two of the major events that touched off the big internet social justice war that has snowballed to where we are today, SOPA and PIPA went down in flames in January 2012. And as some people have pointed out, Reddit's new "harassment" policy essentially mirrors the structure of those bills, subs get nuked with no trial and no recourse because someone in authority has decided their content is unacceptable. It would appear on the outside that the SJWs succeeded where corporate America could not, they're implemented their own mini-SOPA, and done so to the cheering of the masses at least on one side of the political spectrum, and the broad approval (and spin doctoring assistance) of the tech media. ...Or did they? Okay everybody, time to get your tinfoil hats on nice and snug! How is it that in the course of about three years, SJWs seem to have infiltrated the tech scene on every level, controlling major websites, gaining an ideological stranglehold over once neutral or libertarian publications and news outlets, and positioning themselves to be able to produce "propaganda bursts" like "gamers are dead" or now "redditors are dead" in coordinated tandem to spin a narrative demonizing any group that's a threat to their ideology? What if they had help? The more l think about it, and the more the anti-free speech efforts of the SJWs seem to mirror ideas like SOPA, the more l start to wonder if this whole thing has been astroturfed. Perhaps the entire SJW movement is manufactured by the big media companies as part of their strategy to change the cultural climate on site blocking, they found a few useful idiots, funded them or gave them access to media spotlight, and relentlessly pushed their agenda as a means of demonizing free speech and the open internet, getting people to accept, and even push for, censorship for ideological reasons, so they'll be more open to the idea of censorship for business reasons Maybe the SJWs appear so inexplicably well coordinated because they actually ARE being coordinated by an outside force So discuss, something worth looking into, or am l a paranoid lunatic? 4 comments share save hide give gold report
http://alfredoafro.com/
View All 214 Images


More:


+ Add a Comment

Comments (0)

There are no comments currently available.

Display Comments

Add a Comment


+ Add an Image

Image Details

297 views (4 from today)

Uploaded Dec 13, 2011 at 12:57PM EST

Origin Entry

Protect IP Act / Stop Online Piracy Act (PIPA / SOPA)

Tags

No tags

Claim Authorship Edit History
Textile Embed