Howdy! You must login or signup first!

Anonymous 02/08/15 (Sun) 20:43:20 ID: 6b1058 No. 1171752 117192 1171928 21172033 I realise I'm a little late to the party so I dont know how much attention this post is going to get Let's look at the SJW conflict using an equation usually reserved for warfare Chance of Victory (V) = Will to Fight (W)X Resources and Means (R) In terms of W the SJWs and ourselves are about equal. We hate each other with the same near-fanatical passions. The only difference is the ideologies which drive us In terms of R the SJWs trump us. We're in possession of a number of internet image boards, some of which we've lost thanks to Moot and the like turning traitor or trying to remain impartial. The SJWs make their homes on and know how to use a number of high traffic sites, most of which are visited by normalfags they're able to persuade to their cause. On top of this they also have Gawker and the like, and continue to gain more blogs and such with every passing day, sometimes even gaining positive publicity in mainstream media. On top of this they're also deeply entrenched within academia, with gender studies classes churning out more and more goyim for them to use as cannon fodder. In order to win a war when the enemy's chance of victory far outnumbers your own, you must decide whether to attack the enemy's W or R. We lack our own R and so cannot possibly stand up to the enemy's. This leaves us W. We need to attack the enemy's will to fight Let's look at some examples from history where armies with inferior R have managed win by crushing the enemy's W Vietnam - By harassing the US and refusing to engage in open conflict, the Vietcong were able to wear down the US's will to fight, to the point where US citizens turned against their government, and the US was forced to withdraw. This knuckle down approach is what GG has mostly been relying on until now. Sure, theyve gone after a few high priority targets (Gawker) and met with mixed success, but really all those battles did was increase the enemy's W while draining their own R by wasting time Now, what has actually made a difference and caused SJWs to lay down their arms? Attacking them when theyre cut off. hit and runs. By doing this, Fish was removed from the equation, costing the enemy a key figurehead. It was only when the liberals infiltrated the movement that this sort of behaviour ceased, and GG began to wane as their own W wavered and the enemy's continued to increase The Civil War The South's entire population equated to less than 10% of the North's and half of the South were slaves not allowed to fight Economically, the city of New York was worth more than the entire South. In 2 months the North manufactured more weapons than the South made throughout the entire war. Given these factors, how was the South able to engage the North in a conflict that spanned almost half a decade? It was because of what Lee termed "War Weariness". His plan was to harass the north as close to home as possible, to crush the Platomic forces so that the North would simply decide the South wasn't worth the cost and let them go. Obviously the South lost, but this was because of Stuart's failure to follow Lee's orders. Had Stuart met with Lee instead of wasting 4 days stealing wagons and marching them, Lee would have made it passed Gettysburg, avoiding any conflict there, and had 4 extra battalions of cavalry at his disposal. From there, he would have had the high ground and been able to crush the Platomic. Had he done this, the North's spirit would have yielded, their W would be reduced to 0. Lincoln would have lost the election. And even with their superior forces, they still would have lost: V- WXR. If W is 0. R doesn't matter To conclude, we need to focus on attacking the enemy's will. We won't beat them in a display of resources, so we need to make ourselves more trouble than it's worth. They need to be in a position where they simply say "YOU DONT WANT THE EQUALITY WE BRING YOU? FINE! FORGET IT. LAST TIME I TRY TO HELP YOU!"

+13

GamerGate Victory Equation


Uploaded by Schabbs Feb 08, 2015 at 10:33PM EST

Share Pin Download More

Origin Entry: GamerGate

File type: png

Resolution: (1557px x 565px)

File size: 96.1 KB


NOTHING HAS F------ CHANGED 10
Gamergate (harassment campaign) Article Talk From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia For other uses, see Gamergate (disambiguation). Gamergate or GamerGate (GG)[¹] was a loosely organized misogynistic online harassment campaign and a right-wing backlash against feminism, diversity, and progressivism in video game culture. [2][³] It was conducted using the hashtag "#Gamergate" primarily in 2014 and 2015.[1][4][5][6] Beginning in August 2014, Gamergate targeted women in the video game industry, most notably feminist media critic Anita Sarkeesian and video game developers Zoë Quinn and Brianna Wu, among others.[7][8][9][10][11] The harassment campaign included doxing, r--- threats, and death threats.[12][13][14] Gamergate proponents ("Gamergaters") stated that they were a social movement, but lacked well-defined goals, a coherent message, and leaders, making Gamergate difficult to define.[15][16][17] Gamergaters claimed to promote ethics in video games journalism, claimed to be protecting the "gamer" identity, and opposed what they asserted as "political correctness" in video games.[18][19][20][21][22] Read Date Target Gamergate, online harassment campaign in 2014-15 that targeted women in the video game industry. The attacks were attributed largely to white male right-wing gamers who railed against the rise and influence of women and feminism in the industry. Gamergate served as a recruiting tool for the growing alt-right movement and helped spur the online “Pizzagate" conspiracy theory, which soon spawned the wider QAnon conspiracy movement. …………………………....…..……….…..... Attack type Victims Motive View source Inquiry XA 28 languages ✓ Perpetrators Internet trolls, particularly from 4chan, Internet Relay Chat, and 8chan View history Tools ✓ Gamergate August 2014 - 2015 Women in the video game industry See all media Online harassment campaign Zoë Quinn, Anita Sarkeesian, Brianna Wu, and others Gamergaters created conspiracy theories falsely accusing Quinn of an unethical relationship with video game journalist Nathan Grayson.[23][24][25] More broadly, they alleged unethical collusion between the press and feminists, progressives, and social critics.[17][26] [27] These claims were widely dismissed as trivial, conspiracy theories, baseless, or unrelated to actual issues of ethics in gaming and journalism.[28] [29][30] Gamergate supporters frequently denied that the harassment took place, falsely claiming it to be manufactured by the victims.[31][32] Misogyny anti-feminism anti- progressivism FBI investigation Gamergate has been described as a culture war over cultural diversification, artistic recognition, feminism in video games, social criticism in video games, and the social identity of gamers.[28][33] [34] [35] Many supporters of Gamergate opposed the increasing influence of feminism and so-called "social justice warriors" on video game culture. [2][36] Gamergate led figures both inside and outside the gaming industry to focus on methods of addressing online harassment, ways to minimize harm, and prevent similar events. [37] [38] [39] [40] Gamergate has been viewed as a contributor to the alt-right and other right- wing movements.[21][41] Video game developer Brianna Wu
Jalen Hutchinson Studied Culinary Science at Culinary Institute of America (Graduated 2014). Author has 304 answers and 740.1K answer views. 5y Not that I care that much either way, but it did expose a lot of corrupt game developers and game journalists. X Journalists would make claims of people like Anita Sarkeesian "playing video games all her life" when she openly admitted many times she is not a gamer and only starter recently (when it wasn't for an interview). Various developers trading sex or money for good reviews got exposed, journalists who accepted got exposed. People became a bit more critical about supporting a game just because the developer has a victim complex stating tat their game could have only failed because of sexism, instead of their own poor developing skills. What really sealed the deal was opposition often faking their own harassment. Anita sarkeesian and Zoe Quinn have been caught multiple times screenshotting "harassment" while showing that the harrasser's account name in the login. Or when someone called the police to help Sarkeesian against a "very real threat" she was posting about, only for police to find the harasser's messages were coming from her IP address. I just want honesty from the community, and the lies were mostly exposed by the "dreaded" gamergate. 1.3K views • View upvotes 26
View All 4,079 Images

Load 6 Comments

Moar:

Top Comments

Bookie
Delete
Sensitive
Bookie

in reply to Bookie

Part 2

/pol/ doesn’t get that this is total war, and in total war you don’t reject a plan because “it takes too long”, “it’s indirect”, or “it’s ideologically incorrect”.

You don’t want to take out enemy figureheads, you want to take out the enemies ability to wage war.

An enemy that is ignorant of your resources, tactics, goals, and knowledge is a good enemy. An enemy that is too arrogant to consider you a real threat is a good enemy. An enemy that alienates neutrals & then assumes the neutrals are on your side is a good enemy.

We want SOCJUS to be willfully blind to the situation, firmly convinced of their own infallibility, and believing that anyone that doesn’t agree with them 100% of the way is part of us.

That’s why we care about PR, because if a person is forced to choose between the side that fights for truth, freedom, & starving orphans and the side that fights for hate, slavery & kicking puppies, it’s not hard to figure out which side they’re going to join.

And SOCJUS inability to handle someone not in lockstep with them means that neutrals will be forced to choose a side.

+5
Reply
Bookie
Delete
Sensitive
Bookie

[Note: Copy-Pasting from the article comments]

Part 1

And this is why I don’t like /pol/.

You people just figured this out now?

And you’re missing the most important factor, competence.

It doesn’t matter how much will to fight you have if you keep mounting frontal charges, no matter how suicidal.
It doesn’t matter how may resources you have if you keep blowing them on pointless shit & buying in the most inefficient way possible.

As for the rest:

We have far more will to fight then SJWs, do you think they’re fighting for anything they love? Do you think they’ve ever had to deal with powerlessness and hard choices? Do you think they have comradery and friendship with each other?

And your timeline? Phil Fish cut and ran in early September, our will to fight, our resources, & our competence has grown immensely since then.

Gawker was a waste of time? 7 figures & we’ve only gotten more devoted to crushing them.

What are you suggesting we do? Do you have a victory scenario that doesn’t involve Gawker being crushed into dust?

+4
Reply

+ Add a Comment

Comments (6)


Display Comments

Add a Comment


+ Add an Image

Image Details

1,964 views (1 from today)

Uploaded Feb 08, 2015 at 10:33PM EST

Origin Entry

GamerGate

Tags

equation, victory, solution, gamersandgates

Claim Authorship Edit History
Textile Embed