Howdy! You must login or signup first!

See Also - "Trans-Pacific Partnership":/memes/trans-pacific-partnership Remember SOPA?, well imagine that but also in medicine ,food, giving the big corporations the right to do whatever they want Trans Pacific Partnership their heaven, our hell educate yourselves http://a2knetwork.org/tpp if doesn't work you can google "TPP", or " Trans Pacific Partnership" while it exists.

+80

I suggest to forget the hate for certain site to make a call to reason


Uploaded by JMFmagnum Jun 29, 2015 at 02:41PM EDT

Share Pin Download More

Origin Entry: Supreme Court Gay Marriage Ruling

File type: jpg

Resolution: (500px x 498px)

File size: 49.4 KB


5 3.13 Gay marriage? No way. It's against nature. BIZARRO.COM facekeok.com/Bizarg iae
. In 2009, a man married a video game character . In 2007, a woman married the Eiffel Tower o In 2008, a man married a life- sized doll . Also in 2009, a woman married a roller coaster . And in 2005, a woman married a dolphin please explain to me why people still say that gays shouldnt be able to be married to preserve the sanctity of marraige Also please explain why this is not in chronological order it makes me very uncomfortable
by RUBEN BOLLING BuG THE TWO FISTSOF SUPREME JUSTICE UDGE SCALIA IS TRAVERSING THE LANDSCAPE, SEARCHING FOR HIPPIES TO HECTOR HIDGE SCALIAI JUDGE SCALIA! TEXTUAL || ORIGIMALISM WHERE IN BLAZES HELP! THE STATE COULD THOSE LONG- WON'T LET US HAIRS BE HIDING. MARRY! WHA,? THRILLS. CHILLS.... HE CONJURES THE ORIGINAL WHAT?NO SOONER IS THE JUDGE FRAMERS OF THE FOURTEENTH | 1 AMENDMENT H--- SEX.. WAIT, > BACK ON HIS WAY, WHEN... JUDGE SCALIA! CAMPAIGN CRYBABIES!I RULE ONLYASFNANCE LAWS WON'T LET スー JUST AS I THouGHT! YER OUTTA LUCkK THE CONSTITUTION WAS WRITENMY CORPORATION CONTRIBUTE TO POLITICIANS AS I'D LIKE! NERRE DID you INTEND TO INCLUDE HOMOSEXUAL MARRIAGE IN THE DUE PROCESS AND EQUAL PROTECTION CLAUSES? 乙 ER!! WHoND so, JUDGE SCALIA O,DRAFTERS OF THE FIRST AMENDMENT, DID You INTEND CARES WHAT You THOUGHT?ONCE AGAIN PROVES HIS FOR CORPORATIONS TO BE COV- I'LL RULE WHAT You ERED BY FREEDOM oF SPEECH?SHouLD HAVE THOUGHT!JUDICIAL INTERPRETATION, A CONSISTENT APPROACH TO REGARDLESS OF OUTCOME. WHAT? NO ONE DID! COR- PORATIONS BARELY EXISTED THIS PROTECTED HUMANS. / HUSH, HuSH, MY SWEET CORPORATION WERE YoUR FEEL- INGS HURT? INC C.
View All 93 Images

Load 29 Comments

More:

Top Comments


+ Add a Comment

Comments (29)


Display Comments

Add a Comment


+ Add an Image

Image Details

6,798 views (2 from today)

Uploaded Jun 29, 2015 at 02:41PM EDT

Origin Entry

Supreme Court Gay Marriage Ruling

Tags

forget about 9gag for a moment please, tpp, trans pacific partnership

Claim Authorship Edit History
Textile Embed