Forums / Media / Moving Images

18,578 total conversations in 826 threads

+ New Thread


The first image for the emoji movie has come out

Last posted Oct 15, 2016 at 10:34AM EDT. Added Oct 10, 2016 at 08:04PM EDT
41 posts from 39 users

Deadline article

Sony Pictures Animation has added James Corden and Broad City‘s Ilana Glazer to Emojimovie: Express Yourself, its summer 2017 pic that “reveals the Secret World inside your smartphone.” They join the previously set T.J. Miller in the lead voice cast. Check out the first image above.

Anthony Leondis is directing the story that takes place in Textopolis, a bustling city where all your favorite emojis live, hoping to be selected by the phone’s user. In this world, each emoji has only one facial expression -- except for Gene (Miller), who was born without a filter. Determined to become “normal,” he enlists the help of his handy best friend Hi-5 (Corden) and the notorious Jailbreak (Glazer). Together, they embark on an epic “app-venture” to find the code that will fix Gene. But when a greater danger threatens the phone, the fate of all emojis depends on these three unlikely friends who must save their world before it’s deleted forever.

AAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA

Last edited Oct 10, 2016 at 08:05PM EDT

>a movie about emojis
>it's also generic asf

wake me up inside when 2017 ends

Slutty Witch Bitch wrote:

Only condition that would allow me to watch this is if the thinking emoji is a character and if the crying laughing one is super self aware.

plot twist: the mc becomes the crying emoji

Last edited Oct 10, 2016 at 08:26PM EDT

So, I just checked when exactly the film's coming out and it releases in August 2017. August is a dump month, so I have plenty of reasons to expect this movie to flop. Besides, are we gonna make animated films about literally anything these days?

Literally everything about this movie I've seen so far is hopelessly cliche.

- Typical "life inside a computer" setting
- Generic large city with the "xopolis" snowclone name
- Protagonist is a bland average guy whose only distinguishing feature (in this case, his being "born without a filter") is something completely beyond his control
- "Three unlikely friends" consisting of the aforementioned bland average guy, a male the protagonist has known for a while who more than likely will be the comic relief, and an adventurous good bad girl
- Vaguely defined macguffin
- Inexplicable save the world plot

Now, normally, I'd still give a movie like this the benefit of the doubt, because cliche does not necessarily equal bad. The Lego Movie included several of the above cliches and still managed to be one of the cleverest and, ironically, one of the most original films I've ever seen.

But this is a movie about fucking emoji, there's no way it can be good.

>tfw The Emoji Movie is actually a thing

Textopolis, a bustling city where all your favorite emojis live, hoping to be selected by the phone’s user. In this world, each emoji has only one facial expression -- except for Gene (Miller), who was born without a filter. Determined to become “normal,” he enlists the help of his handy best friend Hi-5 (Corden) and the notorious Jailbreak (Glazer). Together, they embark on an epic “app-venture” to find the code that will fix Gene. But when a greater danger threatens the phone, the fate of all emojis depends on these three unlikely friends who must save their world before it’s deleted forever.

From what I can tell, this movie will be cheesy and boring as shit. I'm predicting that the review scores will be 4/10 at best, along with the movie getting a Razzies nomination.

Why is this happening in this first place? Why emojis of all things? I get wanting to create film topics that are based on what people perceive as trendy and cool, but focusing your movie exclusively on EMOJIS is so specific and niche, that it's pathetic, even more so given how the majority of the internet feels about them and their overuse.

The Transistor wrote:

Why is this happening in this first place? Why emojis of all things? I get wanting to create film topics that are based on what people perceive as trendy and cool, but focusing your movie exclusively on EMOJIS is so specific and niche, that it's pathetic, even more so given how the majority of the internet feels about them and their overuse.

As far as they know the general public, the kind of people NEETs would call normies, still uses them seriously. All of that annoyance towards them is mostly contained here on the internet where no one would see some unfiltered opinions

It's still a terribad concept for a movie though

Artichoke wrote:

As far as they know the general public, the kind of people NEETs would call normies, still uses them seriously. All of that annoyance towards them is mostly contained here on the internet where no one would see some unfiltered opinions

It's still a terribad concept for a movie though

At the end of the day, it's a cash grab, much like those movies, shows and cartoons you see on TV that exist purely to sell toys and merch. Hollywood knows emojis are super popular right now, especially among pre-teens and high school freshmen, as well as, dare I say it, normies who still share Harambe memes on Facebook and think winning 'Twitter beef' is an accomplishment.

the very premise of this movie leads me to believe that its going to be very lackluster. I don't know how one could make a good movie about emoji's, but i guess the same was said about lego, and it turned out well.

Part of my wants to wait until the reviews come out before judging it, just in case we have another Lego Movie on our hands. A much stronger part of me wants to write off for the "add-venture" pun.

Last edited Oct 11, 2016 at 01:03PM EDT

TripleA9000 wrote:

the very premise of this movie leads me to believe that its going to be very lackluster. I don't know how one could make a good movie about emoji's, but i guess the same was said about lego, and it turned out well.

Well, Legos are something that have been around for decades. Many people across generations have at least touched at least one brick of the stuff in their life. Maybe they played with it with their children, maybe they did play with it as children, or maybe you happened to be one of the unfortunate souls that has howled in pain from stepping on them. Many people know what Legos are and have bonded with them to the point that they have become almost as much of a household name as something could get. Combined with the fact that there are Legos for damn near everything, only God knows what the Lego Movie could have been about. Just as with Legos themselves, the possibilities were fucking endless.

Emojis, on the other hand, have become the faces of irony for those that know what they're doing. Pun intended.

I absolutely detest emojis on their own, now it's getting its own movie! Kudos to them though for sticking to their guns and releasing it in theaters. We all remember the LAST maymay movie that was going to be a big Hollywood Blockbuster….but then Grumpy Cat died out and it got stuck being a Lifetime original Christmas movie. And holy shit you can see that they have no faith in this movie when they cast Mr. "I seriously only have enough charisma to be the main character's best friend" as THE MAIN CHARACTER.

Honestly wouldn't be disappointed to hear Emoji The Movie became a Hallmark original movie though.

Last edited Oct 12, 2016 at 01:17AM EDT
But when a greater danger threatens the phone, the fate of all emojis depends on these three unlikely friends who must save their world before it’s deleted forever.

While it already sound like we know the ending, I would definitely want to watch an unofficial alternate ending (maybe Destruction of Lithone style) like was made for the Yogi Bear movie.

Jorgan the Sneedfule wrote:


The promotional image is literally the same thing as this obscure Spanish movie that I come across on Netflix from time to time. It's like the retarded illegitimate birth-child of the Lego Movie and Inside Out.

With that poster you just summarized the sad state for animation industry film in Latin America.


Now about the movie. Who knows how many creative and original film projects were dropped out by Sony Animation Pictures before this thing got greenlighted, but why on earth you would pick up the most boring, generic, uninspired setting for an animation film that features frickin' EMOJIS!?

Just why…

Skeletor-sm

This thread is closed to new posts.

Old threads normally auto-close after 30 days of inactivity.

Why don't you start a new thread instead?

Hi! You must login or signup first!