except 90% of the people who get banned from social media nowadays are banned WITHOUT violating community guidelines!

when said "violators" ask what did they do wrong, they are NEVER provided with an answer or just get a vague "you did bad"

even worse – when the social media platforms CHANGE their guidelines, in the sole purpose to ban the people they dislike

and whats even worse than that – when said "violators" try to create a new social network, they get denied service from banks and Paypal, to make sure it will be impossible to fund it.

social network corportaion are a corrupt monopoly that wants to control your thoughts, its a PROVEN FACT

and your NYT comparison doesn't make a lick of sense. NYT is a dedicated news outlet that only publishes authorized articles, it's not a public space where everyone can speak their mind.

when youtube conspires with Twitter and Facebook, to simultaniously ban a person from all said platform, and then make sure credit companies will refuse to allow him trafic so that they could set up their own platfrom. – its called a corrupt monoploly!

and no, the credit compnies did not do because "they knew the new site is going to crash" that pure bullshit. Gab and Subscribe Star are doing perfectly fine.