-
What Is 'Blobslop'? The Term Used To Criticize Supposedly 'Low Effort' Twitter Blob Art Explained -
What Is 'The Creepypasta Song?' The Viral Song From YouTube About Famous Creepypastas Explained -
Do Rich Hollywood Elites Eat Mermaids? The Viral 'Mermaid Eating Parties' Conspiracy Theory Explained -
Why Are TikTokers Calling SpongeBob 'Pagani?' The Viral 'I Call Patrick Subaru' Spinoff Meme Explained -
Who Is Johnny Somali And Why South Korea Is Trying To Jail Him? The Controversial YouTuber And His List Of Alleged Crimes Explained
+27
2022 Roe v. Wade Supreme Court Overturn (meme)
Uploaded by Owen May 03, 2022 at 02:10PM EDT
roe v wade 2022 abortion women's rights government politics united states mel gibson talking to bloody jesus freedom military draft double standard
Origin Entry: 2022 Supreme Court Overturning of Roe v. Wade
File type: jpg
Resolution: (640px x 360px)
File size: 69.5 KB
More:
+27
2022 Supreme Court Overturning of Roe v. Wade - 2022 Roe v. Wade Supreme Court Overturn (meme)
| ◄ Previous | View Gallery Random Image | Next ► |
![Matt Ford @fordm In a solo concurring opinion, Thomas says the court should reconsider rulings that protect contraception, same-sex relationships, and same-sex marriage. Cite as: 597 U. S. (2022) 3 THOMAS, J., concurring 381 U. S. 479 (1965) (right of married persons to obtain con- traceptives)*; Lawrence v. Texas, 539 U. S. 558 (2003) (right to engage in private, consensual sexual acts); and Oberge- fell v. Hodges, 576 U. S. 644 (2015) (right to same-sex mar- riage), are not at issue. The Court's abortion cases are unique, see ante, at 31-32, 66, 71-72, and no party has asked us to decide "whether our entire Fourteenth Amend- ment jurisprudence must be preserved or revised," McDon- ald, 561 U. S., at 813 (opinion of THOMAS, J.). Thus, I agree that "[n]othing in [the Court's] opinion should be under- stood to cast doubt on precedents that do not concern abor- tion." Ante, at 66. 19 For that reason, in future cases, we should reconsider all of this Court's substantive due process precedents, includ- ing Griswold, Lawrence, and Obergefell. Because any sub- stantive due process decision is "demonstrably erroneous," Ramos v. Louisiana, 590 U. S. (2020) (THOMAS, J., concurring in judgment) (slip op., at 7), we have a duty to "correct the error" established in those precedents, Gamble v. United States, 587 U. S. (2019) (THOMAS, J., con- curring) (slip op., at 9). After overruling these demonstra- bly erroneous decisions, the question would remain whether other constitutional provisions guarantee the myr- iad rights that our substantive due process cases have gen- erated. For example, we could consider whether any of the rights announced in this Court's substantive due process cases are "privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States" protected by the Fourteenth Amendment. Amdt. :](https://i.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/list/002/392/454/11f.png "Justice Clarence Thomas Suggests Overturning Gay Marriage")
Comments (23)
Add a Comment
Image Details
7,924 views (11 from today)
Uploaded May 03, 2022 at 02:10PM EDT
Origin Entry
Source
Tags
roe v wade, 2022, abortion, women's rights, government, politics, united states, mel gibson talking to bloody jesus, freedom, military, draft, double standard
About the Uploader
Owen
Federal Agent
Top Comments
pinkiespy - goat spy
May 03, 2022 at 07:04PM EDT in reply to
Mistress Fortune
May 04, 2022 at 07:52AM EDT