Hello! You must login or signup first!

目Blogs A Guide to Ending "Gamers by Devin Wilson on 08/28/14 07:57:00 pm The following blog post, unless otherwise noted, was written by a member of Gamasutra's comnunity The thoughts and opinions expressed are those of the writer and not Gamasutra or its parent company. Whether it's in the concluding chapter of lan Bogost's How to Do Things With Videogames (The s more recent enough), or the hundreds of tweets being written about it, we're seeing calls to do away with the is great, but this c to Celebrating that uncertain victory now is premature, hubristic, and an insult to the people who are suffering abuse from self-identified lg As such, ľd like to postpone our back-patting and think about solutions for bringing this change achieved today than about sooner than later, as I think that ending the regular harassment of women in games is better We cant just Twitter-block the problem away. Even a video series critical of the medium is only a partial solution. Games culture needs to change at a grassroots level, and each of us have a part to play in that revolution if we want it to happen. It's not only the worst of us who need to change. None of us are outside of this system. None of us are completely above its effects. None of us are entirely innocent. We all need to work to make our role in games culture more positive (which absolutely does not mean So here are some preliminary tactics I propose for transforming games (feel free to propose your s, and offer revisions to mine) 1. We don't wait. We don't wait until after that big, exciting sequel is out. We dont wait until after E3, GDC, or PAX. We don't wait until we finish this game we've been investing hours into, or until after we unlock that new assault rifle. We don't wait for other people to fix this. There's just going to be another E3 and another newly-announced game and another excuse to not look at the present state of games culture. This industry has been distracting us with carrots- on-sticks since its inception, repeatedly pulling the rug out from under us before we could even get oriented in the first place. There's always been a promise of something better around so we don't bother examining or acting-on us examine ourselves and act, right now. We've been doing far too much waiting in games. We need to raise our expectations and stop waiting for the medium to mature. It's 2014. The first generation of consoles was decades ago. The only reason for games to be immature is if its consumers and producers are allowing them to be that way. The people who have decided to 2. We listen to those who are less privileged than we are, and we don't adopt a default stance of skepticism towards their views and claims. We support them when we have the warrior (if only to subvert its use as a pejorative). We do whatever we can to leam about the 3. We display broader interests as individuals who make and play games. We spend more power to, we involve them when we have the power to, and we don't ignore it when institutions fail to do these things. We each proudly claim the label of "social justice nequalities in the world, and we examine what we can do to change things for the better time learning about the world beyond this industry. We put more effort into making games what we've suffocatingly narrow o ignore all of the things outside of their window when they decide to make a game. There's a lot of 4. We make and play fewer isolating games, including online multiplayer games. If our medium is designed for people to stay secluded for dozens of hours while having their egos stroked, then we reap what we sow in terms of the kinds of people who emerge from this pastime. We need to consider the very real possibility that the offensive behavior displayed by gamers in recent weeks is not unrelated to the artifacts they raly around (which I doubt are especially obscure). These people didn't come from nowhere to fight about nothing. They came from games to fight about games. Theyre organic results of the medium we've all played a role in cultivating, and they won't go away if the medium doesn't change significantly 5. We become far more mindful of the games we make and play. Sexism in games is pervasive and toxic. Racism in games is pervasive and toxic. Violence in games is pervasive looks like violent games are repeatedly suggesting this and then we complain that the vilest people in our communities are too aggressive and not eagemess to make and play games that have these overall effects on people? If you think you're not affected, you're sorely mistaken and you sound no less ridiculous than people who claim that advertising doesn't work on them. (By the way, kids are regularly playing violent games too, because that's what our culture says is expected of real gamers. ESRB ratings s more aggressive and less our l eye towards the e s scene and its machismo. We've been trying to make careers out of playing what seem like the videogame equivalents of American football (MOBAs) and mixed martial arts (fighting games), in a warped attempt at gaining legitimacy for our pastime. Back when the genre of choice for the of what these competitive videogames often did to people (including me and my friends). Let me assure you that it's very sad and ugly, and it doesn't seem like that's changed much. People passionately t professionally) is scaryatars over the 7. We change the culture of game consumption to be less about buying and rating games, and instead develop a paradigm that is more about playing and thoroughly purchases. "Gamers" are such vicious gatekeepers because they want to protect the perceived value of their investments. We can subvert that by making and playing more free games, changing the ways we evaluate and discuss games, and finding new ways to fund 8. We jettison the hardcore/casual dichotomy. It's utter garbage that's only used for three reasons: 1) to feel superior to others, 2) to tragically submit to unjust hierarchies of play, or 3) ly reinforce the other two). mastering a free mobile game over many years or spending a Saturday buying and exhausting the latest murder simulator that you believed you were supposed to play? 9. We let the industry's tentpoles fall to the ground more often. We stop allowing ourselves to be told which games we need to play. We're smarter than that We abandon any skepticism any of us have towards concems about the dealers want their customers to have fun too, you know.) 10. We always remember that we don't need to buy new things in order to legitimately appreciate games. We play old games until they've revealed all of their secrets, and then we play them some more. We stop implicitly accepting the idea that games are meant to be disposable. We dissect gaming's recent and ancient past (and everything in between) instead 11. We stop upholding "fun" as the universal, ultimate criterion for a game's relevance It's a meaningless ideal at best and a poisonous priority at worst. Fun is a neurological trick. are more healing", "pro-social", or even "enlightening. Iencourage you to decide upon your own alternatives to fun" in games (while avoiding terms like "cool and "awesome and any other word that simply caters to existing, unexamined biases) 12. We don't afford any credence to the idea that games are "just for fun". Games are not neutral. Anita Sarkeesian is not imposing her feminist values onto games, she's identifying the that game misogynistic values games. You don't have to think her efforts are perfect, but what she's doing is not ice is cowardly. We need to regularly compare our games values to our own real values. In the end, we may arrive at different conclusions about what 13. We make and play fewer linear games about one person saving the world. Take a look at the people terrorizing games culture lately: they're almost all tyrannical brats with messianic delusions. Where do you think they're learning this behavior from? 14. We make gaming more like recreation or reading than it is like religion. What we're seeing lately is not merely a mob of odd hobbyists frustrated by change, but an army of fanatics on what they perceive to be a holy crusade. These people have dogmatic views of what games need to be (a theological approach, to be sure) and they express a devotion to the game industry that makes Mitt Romney's tithing look stingy. Forget The Beatles, Mario is more popular than Jesus now, and any criticism of that franchise is going to be received by a special club that of activities. This means that we should associate less strongly around such a vague term. Being interested in games doesn't mean you need to play every game that comes out and have an opinion on it. It doesn't mean that every game is for you. The games press creates an illusion that every big game needs to be played by everyone who likes games. Games as a all of film, radio, television, print, etc. Compare two random works of one of those other media breadth of games is staggering, and we need to cool it on the preoccupation with having an 16. We do not assume that the harassment we've seen lately is a complete aberration. We understand that there is a link between this medium that terrorists see themselves as 17. We agree that caring about the world and its inhabitants is more important than 18. We all grow up (starting this very instant), and we bring games along with us. This doesn't mean making grittier" or "darker games. Rather, we make and play games that we have no reason to be ashamed of, and-most importantly-we're honest about what may very

+4

"A Guide to Ending Gamers"


Uploaded by Traze Sep 04, 2014 at 03:24PM EDT

Share Pin Download More

Origin Entry: GamerGate

File type: png

Resolution: (672px x 3048px)

File size: 338 KB


NOTHING HAS F------ CHANGED 10
Gamergate (harassment campaign) Article Talk From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia For other uses, see Gamergate (disambiguation). Gamergate or GamerGate (GG)[¹] was a loosely organized misogynistic online harassment campaign and a right-wing backlash against feminism, diversity, and progressivism in video game culture. [2][³] It was conducted using the hashtag "#Gamergate" primarily in 2014 and 2015.[1][4][5][6] Beginning in August 2014, Gamergate targeted women in the video game industry, most notably feminist media critic Anita Sarkeesian and video game developers Zoë Quinn and Brianna Wu, among others.[7][8][9][10][11] The harassment campaign included doxing, r--- threats, and death threats.[12][13][14] Gamergate proponents ("Gamergaters") stated that they were a social movement, but lacked well-defined goals, a coherent message, and leaders, making Gamergate difficult to define.[15][16][17] Gamergaters claimed to promote ethics in video games journalism, claimed to be protecting the "gamer" identity, and opposed what they asserted as "political correctness" in video games.[18][19][20][21][22] Read Date Target Gamergate, online harassment campaign in 2014-15 that targeted women in the video game industry. The attacks were attributed largely to white male right-wing gamers who railed against the rise and influence of women and feminism in the industry. Gamergate served as a recruiting tool for the growing alt-right movement and helped spur the online “Pizzagate" conspiracy theory, which soon spawned the wider QAnon conspiracy movement. …………………………....…..……….…..... Attack type Victims Motive View source Inquiry XA 28 languages ✓ Perpetrators Internet trolls, particularly from 4chan, Internet Relay Chat, and 8chan View history Tools ✓ Gamergate August 2014 - 2015 Women in the video game industry See all media Online harassment campaign Zoë Quinn, Anita Sarkeesian, Brianna Wu, and others Gamergaters created conspiracy theories falsely accusing Quinn of an unethical relationship with video game journalist Nathan Grayson.[23][24][25] More broadly, they alleged unethical collusion between the press and feminists, progressives, and social critics.[17][26] [27] These claims were widely dismissed as trivial, conspiracy theories, baseless, or unrelated to actual issues of ethics in gaming and journalism.[28] [29][30] Gamergate supporters frequently denied that the harassment took place, falsely claiming it to be manufactured by the victims.[31][32] Misogyny anti-feminism anti- progressivism FBI investigation Gamergate has been described as a culture war over cultural diversification, artistic recognition, feminism in video games, social criticism in video games, and the social identity of gamers.[28][33] [34] [35] Many supporters of Gamergate opposed the increasing influence of feminism and so-called "social justice warriors" on video game culture. [2][36] Gamergate led figures both inside and outside the gaming industry to focus on methods of addressing online harassment, ways to minimize harm, and prevent similar events. [37] [38] [39] [40] Gamergate has been viewed as a contributor to the alt-right and other right- wing movements.[21][41] Video game developer Brianna Wu
Jalen Hutchinson Studied Culinary Science at Culinary Institute of America (Graduated 2014). Author has 304 answers and 740.1K answer views. 5y Not that I care that much either way, but it did expose a lot of corrupt game developers and game journalists. X Journalists would make claims of people like Anita Sarkeesian "playing video games all her life" when she openly admitted many times she is not a gamer and only starter recently (when it wasn't for an interview). Various developers trading sex or money for good reviews got exposed, journalists who accepted got exposed. People became a bit more critical about supporting a game just because the developer has a victim complex stating tat their game could have only failed because of sexism, instead of their own poor developing skills. What really sealed the deal was opposition often faking their own harassment. Anita sarkeesian and Zoe Quinn have been caught multiple times screenshotting "harassment" while showing that the harrasser's account name in the login. Or when someone called the police to help Sarkeesian against a "very real threat" she was posting about, only for police to find the harasser's messages were coming from her IP address. I just want honesty from the community, and the lies were mostly exposed by the "dreaded" gamergate. 1.3K views • View upvotes 26
View All 4,079 Images

Load 6 Comments

More:

Top Comments

Spaghetti Lord
Delete
Sensitive
Spaghetti Lord

A guide to ending gamers? Meaning the consumers that buy and play games? How the hell would they make money then? Are these people crazy?

And that list of things below … what the hell is that? Developers will make the games they want to make, based on their vision. You do not force them to make what you want because your crazy delusional mind sees sexism and racism everywhere and in every little thing. I personally don't care if a character is male, female, gay, hell it can be a three headed space lizard for all I care, but the decision to put that character in the game belongs to the developer, not because someone forced him to do it.

And "making games not about fun" … then what's their fucking point then? I play games to have fun not to have something preach to me about idiotic SJW crap.
Time to join this gamergate.

+6
Reply

+ Add a Comment

Comments (6)


Display Comments

Add a Comment


+ Add an Image

Image Details

1,181 views (13 from today)

Uploaded Sep 04, 2014 at 03:24PM EDT

Origin Entry

GamerGate

Tags

journalism, gamasutra, gamergate, nofunallowed

Claim Authorship Edit History
Textile Embed