Yo! You must login or signup first!

↑ [-] IrbyTremor 쑈socTAL JUSTICE JABBERWOCKY쑈 [M] 1 point 24 minutes ago Nope. Removed This is obvious JAQing off permalink save report give gold reply ↑ [-] Redknight5 [S] 1 point 18 minutes ago What does that mean? permalink save parent edit delete reply ↑ [-] IrbyTremor 쑈socuL JUSTICE JABBERWOCKY쑈 [M] 1 point 14 minutes ago "Just Asking Questions" You're not 'neutral', you can easily get your answers from a simple search. Sorry but no tolerance for these threads which we see a thousand times a day permalink save parent report give gold reply [-] Redknight5 [S] 1 point 12 minutes ago I fail to understand. Of course I'm not neutral, that's why I am coming here to learn more about the side of the issue that I would consider myself less sympathetic too. It is extremely difficult to find anything about either side that isn't extremely biased so why not just come to the source and ask? permalink save parent edit delete reply ↑ [-] Redknight5 [5] 1 point 10 minutes ago I have a thread on the pro GG forum asking the same questions, and I am actually getting to have an open discussion here with people who see the issue differently then I do, how is that a removable offense? permalink save parent edit delete reply ↑ [-] IrbyTremor 쑈socTAL JUSTICE JABBERWOCKY [M] 1 point 8 minutes ago I have a thread on the pro GG forum asking the same questions Yeah thats called JAQing off. We're good permalink save parent report give gold reply ↑ [-] Redknight5 [5] 1 point 8 minutes ago How... what...? I just want understand the issue better... and that's offensive to you? permalink save parent edit delete reply [-] 1rbyTremor 쑈socuL JUSTICE JABBERWOCKY b [M] 1 point 5 minutes ago Did I mention being 'offended'? No, this isnt being offended. This is our rule. Every answer you could have wanted is searchable AQing off gums up the works. If you have an issue you can discuss it in our modmail permalink save parent report give gold reply ↑ [-] Redknight5 [S] 1 point 4 minutes ago So I'm confused, if this thread doesn't exist to explain GG and Anti GG sentiment, what does it exist to do? permalink save parent edit delete reply ↑ [-] Redknight5 [5] 1 point just now when I played devils advocate on the GG subreddit I wasn't threatened with having my thread removed for wanting to discuss it, what about discussing this matter is "gumming up the works"? permalink save parent edit delete reply ↑ [-] Redknight5 [S] 1 point 21 minutes ago So I'd like to say I was proGG, but really I believe in and fervently agree with both sides of the issue so I wonder where the group for that exists. -.- Sexism is bad... Corruption is bad... Why are both groups screaming at each other from across the isle? Video games are an amazing way of addressing social issues and making you feel things in ways that other mediums cannot so it makes sense that gaming is the prefect medium for addressing sexism, but why does it feel like it has to be an "either/or" at this point with sexism and ethics permalink save edit delete reply

+20

Do not question


Uploaded by Evilthing Nov 01, 2014 at 10:32AM EDT

Share Pin Download More

Origin Entry: GamerGate

File type: png

Resolution: (922px x 910px)

File size: 53.8 KB


NOTHING HAS F------ CHANGED 10
Gamergate (harassment campaign) Article Talk From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia For other uses, see Gamergate (disambiguation). Gamergate or GamerGate (GG)[¹] was a loosely organized misogynistic online harassment campaign and a right-wing backlash against feminism, diversity, and progressivism in video game culture. [2][³] It was conducted using the hashtag "#Gamergate" primarily in 2014 and 2015.[1][4][5][6] Beginning in August 2014, Gamergate targeted women in the video game industry, most notably feminist media critic Anita Sarkeesian and video game developers Zoë Quinn and Brianna Wu, among others.[7][8][9][10][11] The harassment campaign included doxing, r--- threats, and death threats.[12][13][14] Gamergate proponents ("Gamergaters") stated that they were a social movement, but lacked well-defined goals, a coherent message, and leaders, making Gamergate difficult to define.[15][16][17] Gamergaters claimed to promote ethics in video games journalism, claimed to be protecting the "gamer" identity, and opposed what they asserted as "political correctness" in video games.[18][19][20][21][22] Read Date Target Gamergate, online harassment campaign in 2014-15 that targeted women in the video game industry. The attacks were attributed largely to white male right-wing gamers who railed against the rise and influence of women and feminism in the industry. Gamergate served as a recruiting tool for the growing alt-right movement and helped spur the online “Pizzagate" conspiracy theory, which soon spawned the wider QAnon conspiracy movement. …………………………....…..……….…..... Attack type Victims Motive View source Inquiry XA 28 languages ✓ Perpetrators Internet trolls, particularly from 4chan, Internet Relay Chat, and 8chan View history Tools ✓ Gamergate August 2014 - 2015 Women in the video game industry See all media Online harassment campaign Zoë Quinn, Anita Sarkeesian, Brianna Wu, and others Gamergaters created conspiracy theories falsely accusing Quinn of an unethical relationship with video game journalist Nathan Grayson.[23][24][25] More broadly, they alleged unethical collusion between the press and feminists, progressives, and social critics.[17][26] [27] These claims were widely dismissed as trivial, conspiracy theories, baseless, or unrelated to actual issues of ethics in gaming and journalism.[28] [29][30] Gamergate supporters frequently denied that the harassment took place, falsely claiming it to be manufactured by the victims.[31][32] Misogyny anti-feminism anti- progressivism FBI investigation Gamergate has been described as a culture war over cultural diversification, artistic recognition, feminism in video games, social criticism in video games, and the social identity of gamers.[28][33] [34] [35] Many supporters of Gamergate opposed the increasing influence of feminism and so-called "social justice warriors" on video game culture. [2][36] Gamergate led figures both inside and outside the gaming industry to focus on methods of addressing online harassment, ways to minimize harm, and prevent similar events. [37] [38] [39] [40] Gamergate has been viewed as a contributor to the alt-right and other right- wing movements.[21][41] Video game developer Brianna Wu
Jalen Hutchinson Studied Culinary Science at Culinary Institute of America (Graduated 2014). Author has 304 answers and 740.1K answer views. 5y Not that I care that much either way, but it did expose a lot of corrupt game developers and game journalists. X Journalists would make claims of people like Anita Sarkeesian "playing video games all her life" when she openly admitted many times she is not a gamer and only starter recently (when it wasn't for an interview). Various developers trading sex or money for good reviews got exposed, journalists who accepted got exposed. People became a bit more critical about supporting a game just because the developer has a victim complex stating tat their game could have only failed because of sexism, instead of their own poor developing skills. What really sealed the deal was opposition often faking their own harassment. Anita sarkeesian and Zoe Quinn have been caught multiple times screenshotting "harassment" while showing that the harrasser's account name in the login. Or when someone called the police to help Sarkeesian against a "very real threat" she was posting about, only for police to find the harasser's messages were coming from her IP address. I just want honesty from the community, and the lies were mostly exposed by the "dreaded" gamergate. 1.3K views • View upvotes 26
View All 4,079 Images

Load 6 Comments

Moar:

Top Comments

adregun
Delete
Sensitive
adregun

They know that they're full of bullshit and that they can't defend their side of the story, so they tell people to fuck off. Meanwhile we answer everything and tell them the truth, and ofcource they end up joining to our side or they atleast end up sympathetic to us while they have a bad memory of the other side. These guys really don't understand how the human mind works or how society works at all appart from "the weak can be convinced to join your side if you give them a target to scream at". And they call us the asocial nutjobs.

+15
Reply

+ Add a Comment

Comments (6)


Display Comments

Add a Comment


+ Add an Image

Image Details

856 views (12 from today)

Uploaded Nov 01, 2014 at 10:32AM EDT

Origin Entry

GamerGate

Tags

No tags

Claim Authorship Edit History
Textile Embed