Howdy! You must login or signup first!

by MrEnter* , Jun 29 Journals /Persona you guys been to the review segment on my TV Tropes page? Now since some of the things y tend to garner a lot of hatred, I get a lot of trolling reviews. No matter how illogical or incorrect the reasons tha there's always one person "Shota" who pretty much just goes "Thank you!" or something along those lines. This person obviously do t like me, and I've become rather annoyed. Mo lea some kind done effort into trolling by making a revie rson who actu ra pinion wouldn't t by sharing this person, but I had no idea why they didn't omeone something pre or imagined ("I don't know what ion is/means. it? Fluttershy insulting Rarity and Pinkie was actually a another story for another day. And we'll talk about i which has am going to be referring to Shota's comments on the review by Spong conclusion of a major Nickelodeon fan who has only seen the Nickelodeon month videos. Even the author of the review admitted to me that he was being too harsh. The first thing Shota posted was a bold Thank! You! Kind of like what you'd do if someone finally said something that no one else noticed or had the guts too, despite this being the third or so trolling review a full review of me come to the After this someone personally asked me to debunk the review, which I did. It wa if for no other no Shota: N otice how he never posted that response.... here. Yeah y point? Besides if I took the time to snap at every little bad thing said about me on the internet, I'd look like a f------ psycho. I only reserve When the review was flagged by the time that I got there would there really be things like this for the particularly annoying trolls. The other comments before Shota's next comment are unimportant. Finally though Shota r f the bravado, showmanship, professional presentation, or anything else about making internet videos to make them enjoyable. Besides what he's saying Shota:"The thing is, Mr. Enter does not give a s--- about (wishing the creators BEHIND the bad cartoons would die in a fire instead of talking about the cartoons themselves in an unbiased way as though he lives in their same neighborhood), he loops the same clips over and oven again, his voice is unappealing, he has no intro, he has no outro, he themselves which shows that no one told him to BALANCE THE AUDIO VOLUME ON ALL THE ASSETs, and the timing is all the same and results in a very boring, monotonous r uses music cues or edits clips in a way that makes them entertaining, he do his qame, or never ma As a wise man once said, "Let's a go The thing is, Mr. Enter does not give a s--- about f the bravdo, showmanship, professional presentation, or anything else about making iteret videos to make them enjoyable ng internet vide os enjovab le, at least reviewing, you efully. Being funny helps with what you're trying to do. Whether or not I employ these tactics, I still understand them. By understanding them, I in turn, give a s--- Besides what he's saying (wishing the creators BEHIND the bad cartoons would die in a fire instead of talking about the cartoons themselves in an unbiased way as though he lives in their same neighborhood) this? Oh, the Pet Sitte iew where I kept calling Casey Alexander an idiot, or maybe Life of Brian and i led him pretentious or an idiot for constructing the most insulting don't see Nickelodeon getting their s--- together n idiot/whatever is not the same as giving a writer a death threat. What about Nic ried progra isgusting the ation on YouTube while turning down the shows full of potential that were handed to them on ed for laughs was in Pet Sitter manipulative Life of Brian was. And the entire Nickelodeon month wa ocument their pr I did this, it wa I ho standard. I take genre and age group into account, but if it fails what it's trying to do the ias rt Ba is something that the protagonists should be doing. Arthur's Big led to teach that "hitting is wrong." (by He loops clips over ping going on until what's being show an is voice is unappealing" ou don e to hear me talk. You really don't. And if this is going wh ing an internet reviewer. Forget the actua substance. It's the f------ intro; that's where Neither does the Angry Video Game Nerd He never uses musical cues or edits clips in a way to make them entertaining What... do you think that I do on the internet because I believe that we have vastly different opinions on the matter. I make reviews... not abridged series. My job is to take a completely finished product and explain wh s from the product edub the audio of wh m reviewing to tell ative, or use very time tha "He doesn't act a aracter on his videos he's counting this as making internet videos, not particularly reviews. There's a huge community of vloggers, and the majority of them don't have c ter. Within the reviewing community, there are pe e SomecallmeJohnny, Joshscorcher, Pieguyrulz, even Doug Walker's personal vlogs. So otic parrot in my vide His voice is much louder than the clips themselves which shows that no one told him to BALANCE OUT THE AUDIO ON ALL ASSETS." re is on midd You'd know this s---. They know wh aid. Beyond that, do you really want to hear Bubs s on the chalkboard. How ma Or the Tentacolino songs. Maybe Pingo's voice? How about how broken the audio from Ctri+Atl+Del wa And the timing is all the same results in a boring, monotonous pace! Rule one to making reviews The... timing of what? My audio? What? Why does every troll have at least one statement wh talking about re referrin wouldn't make the reviews monotonous. The timing of my tone you talking about He should step ame, or never make videos I mean, compare my One Coarse Meal review to my Spongebob, You're Fired review or my Top 10 Worst Squidward Torture Porns. But I've got a great idea. Why don't you try to make reviews. Make sure that you've got a fully defined character, you have a voice tha ver bri ing up the crea ou're reviewing even when they have a rep or they are doing something immoral behind the you know what, review Uvi Boll film and not bring up This will allow you to avoid all editing hiccups. Completely define your c s the films bomb to a cter from the get-go, risking him having traits that you won't like or tha no one will ferring to catch phrase or closing catchphrase), make one that will do nothing but get you called a rip-off of Doug Walker. Step up, or shut up ady fully formed an opinion on me, loitering in the review segme f my TV Tropes page? At this point, you're obviously not planning on doing a review or you someone vou don something negat them? You poor, mis is still going on. Buy yourself a game you've had your eye on for awhile and get a f------ hob

+2

There is a reason Mr Enter deleted this post.


Uploaded by Butts Mar 12, 2015 at 05:24PM EDT

Share Pin Download More

Origin Entry: The Mysterious Mr. Enter

File type: png

Resolution: (1559px x 2060px)

File size: 222 KB


OLD REVIEWER YELLS AT BEAST Et newpers .t Ka d'Mywr s.e jl Dider ASrakar. Eir.c ld.
WHY DO T HAVE To HEAK TWILIGHT AND MY INNER CHID MY NAME...
View All 82 Images

Load 3 Comments

More:


+ Add a Comment

Comments (3)


Display Comments

Add a Comment


+ Add an Image

Image Details

1,124 views (4 from today)

Uploaded Mar 12, 2015 at 05:24PM EDT

Origin Entry

The Mysterious Mr. Enter

Tags

the mysterious mr enter, deviantart, butthurt

Claim Authorship Edit History
Textile Embed